Identifying a strengthened vegetation sensitivity to drought and its potential drivers at sub-monthly temporal scale in Yangtze River Basin, China.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126487
Xiu Zhang, Lei Cui, Xuan Zhang, Chong Li, Qianzuo Zhao, Fanghua Hao, Guodong Yin
{"title":"Identifying a strengthened vegetation sensitivity to drought and its potential drivers at sub-monthly temporal scale in Yangtze River Basin, China.","authors":"Xiu Zhang, Lei Cui, Xuan Zhang, Chong Li, Qianzuo Zhao, Fanghua Hao, Guodong Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intensified droughts are recognized as a critical factor influencing vegetation productivity, yet many studies focus on monthly or longer temporal-resolution analysis, potentially overlooking short-term responses. Here, based on the constructed 8-day datasets over the past two decades, we employed correlation analysis to identify the vegetation sensitivity and response time to drought, and further investigated the underlying mechanisms of response differences across vegetation types using regression models. Our findings included: (i) Drought sensitivity (R<sub>max</sub> = 0.6348) was stronger than earlier monthly studies, especially in the central Yangtze River Basin (YRB). Vegetation in Tanggula and Wuyi Mountains responded more rapidly, within 24 days. (ii) Cropland exhibited highest drought sensitivity (R<sub>max</sub> = 0.6559) and grassland responded fastest (21.20∗8 day intervals); (iii) A drought sensitivity threshold (9.75-10) marked a turning point beyond which sensitivity declined, while response time generally shortened with increasing severity, except for cropland; (iv) Terrain played a relatively minor role in shaping vegetation response, whereas the impact of climate varied among vegetation types: croplands relied less on precipitation due to irrigation, forests were mainly influenced by precipitation, and alpine grasslands were strongly driven by solar radiation. Our study provided new insights into vegetation dynamics underpinned by drought at finer temporal resolution, highlighting the need to prioritize areas prone to drought impacts in future vegetation management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"391 ","pages":"126487"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126487","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensified droughts are recognized as a critical factor influencing vegetation productivity, yet many studies focus on monthly or longer temporal-resolution analysis, potentially overlooking short-term responses. Here, based on the constructed 8-day datasets over the past two decades, we employed correlation analysis to identify the vegetation sensitivity and response time to drought, and further investigated the underlying mechanisms of response differences across vegetation types using regression models. Our findings included: (i) Drought sensitivity (Rmax = 0.6348) was stronger than earlier monthly studies, especially in the central Yangtze River Basin (YRB). Vegetation in Tanggula and Wuyi Mountains responded more rapidly, within 24 days. (ii) Cropland exhibited highest drought sensitivity (Rmax = 0.6559) and grassland responded fastest (21.20∗8 day intervals); (iii) A drought sensitivity threshold (9.75-10) marked a turning point beyond which sensitivity declined, while response time generally shortened with increasing severity, except for cropland; (iv) Terrain played a relatively minor role in shaping vegetation response, whereas the impact of climate varied among vegetation types: croplands relied less on precipitation due to irrigation, forests were mainly influenced by precipitation, and alpine grasslands were strongly driven by solar radiation. Our study provided new insights into vegetation dynamics underpinned by drought at finer temporal resolution, highlighting the need to prioritize areas prone to drought impacts in future vegetation management practices.

长江流域植被对干旱敏感性增强及其亚月时间尺度的潜在驱动因素
干旱加剧被认为是影响植被生产力的关键因素,但许多研究侧重于月或更长时间分辨率的分析,可能忽略了短期响应。在此基础上,利用近20 a的8 d数据,利用相关分析方法确定了植被对干旱的敏感性和响应时间,并利用回归模型进一步探讨了不同植被类型对干旱响应差异的潜在机制。结果表明:(1)旱情敏感性(Rmax = 0.6348)高于前期月度研究,特别是长江中部地区。唐古拉山和武夷山的植被响应更快,在24天内。(ii)耕地的干旱敏感性最高(Rmax = 0.6559),草地的响应速度最快(21.20 * 8 d);干旱敏感性阈值(9.75-10)标志着一个转折点,超过这个临界点,敏感性就会下降,而响应时间一般随着严重程度的增加而缩短,农田除外;(四)地形对植被响应的影响相对较小,而气候的影响因植被类型而异:农田由于灌溉对降水的依赖较小,森林主要受降水的影响,高寒草原受太阳辐射的强烈驱动。我们的研究在更精细的时间分辨率下为干旱所支持的植被动态提供了新的见解,强调了在未来的植被管理实践中需要优先考虑容易受到干旱影响的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信