Full-Range Drift–Flux Correlation for Upward Cocurrent Two-Phase Flows in Vertical Pipes

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Takashi Hibiki, Chuanshuai Dong, Naofumi Tsukamoto
{"title":"Full-Range Drift–Flux Correlation for Upward Cocurrent Two-Phase Flows in Vertical Pipes","authors":"Takashi Hibiki,&nbsp;Chuanshuai Dong,&nbsp;Naofumi Tsukamoto","doi":"10.1155/er/6193526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In nuclear thermal–hydraulic analysis, the void fraction prediction for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes is essential. The two-fluid model is used as a platform for one-dimensional (One-D) nuclear thermal–hydraulic system analysis codes since it can treat the kinematic and thermal nonequilibrium between phases through interfacial transfer terms. Precise modeling of the area-averaged interfacial drag force in the interfacial momentum transfer term is essential in predicting void fractions accurately. The drift–flux model, which treats the gas–liquid mixture as a pseudo-single fluid yet allows slip between liquid and gas, is widely used in predicting the area-averaged interfacial drag force in two-fluid model-based codes. In the drift–flux model, the distribution parameter and drift velocity are two critical parameters in formulating the area-averaged interfacial drag force. In other applications of the drift–flux model, the one-D drift–flux model is utilized as a simple algebraic tool to predict a one-D void fraction directly from boundary conditions, such as superficial gas and liquid velocities. This study analytically developed a full-range drift–flux correlation for the distribution parameter and drift velocity, which is applicable to a void fraction from 0 to 1 for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes. First, the critical area-averaged void fraction at the onset of the transition to separated two-phase flows was estimated by considering the similar distributions of void fraction and mixture volumetric flux. Then, the constitutive equations of distribution parameter and drift velocity (or drift–flux correlation) for upward cocurrent two-phase flows, including pure dispersed two-phase flows, transition two-phase flows, and separated two-phase flows, were developed. To validate the new correlation, 419 experimentally obtained void fractions for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes were collected from nine sources. The comparison between the experimental results and the void fractions calculated by the newly developed full-range drift–flux correlation indicated that the correlation achieved superior prediction performance to that of the existing drift–flux correlations, and it achieved the mean relative deviation and mean absolute relative deviation of − 0.686% and 6.18%, respectively. The validated range of the proposed correlation is: 0.6 cm ≤ <i>D</i> ≤ 6.7 cm, 0.0338 m/s ≤ 〈<i>j</i><sub><i>g</i></sub>〉 ≤ 159 m/s, and 0.0226 m/s ≤ 〈<i>j</i><sub><i>f</i></sub>〉 ≤ 8.46 m/s.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/6193526","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/6193526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nuclear thermal–hydraulic analysis, the void fraction prediction for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes is essential. The two-fluid model is used as a platform for one-dimensional (One-D) nuclear thermal–hydraulic system analysis codes since it can treat the kinematic and thermal nonequilibrium between phases through interfacial transfer terms. Precise modeling of the area-averaged interfacial drag force in the interfacial momentum transfer term is essential in predicting void fractions accurately. The drift–flux model, which treats the gas–liquid mixture as a pseudo-single fluid yet allows slip between liquid and gas, is widely used in predicting the area-averaged interfacial drag force in two-fluid model-based codes. In the drift–flux model, the distribution parameter and drift velocity are two critical parameters in formulating the area-averaged interfacial drag force. In other applications of the drift–flux model, the one-D drift–flux model is utilized as a simple algebraic tool to predict a one-D void fraction directly from boundary conditions, such as superficial gas and liquid velocities. This study analytically developed a full-range drift–flux correlation for the distribution parameter and drift velocity, which is applicable to a void fraction from 0 to 1 for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes. First, the critical area-averaged void fraction at the onset of the transition to separated two-phase flows was estimated by considering the similar distributions of void fraction and mixture volumetric flux. Then, the constitutive equations of distribution parameter and drift velocity (or drift–flux correlation) for upward cocurrent two-phase flows, including pure dispersed two-phase flows, transition two-phase flows, and separated two-phase flows, were developed. To validate the new correlation, 419 experimentally obtained void fractions for upward two-phase flows in vertical pipes were collected from nine sources. The comparison between the experimental results and the void fractions calculated by the newly developed full-range drift–flux correlation indicated that the correlation achieved superior prediction performance to that of the existing drift–flux correlations, and it achieved the mean relative deviation and mean absolute relative deviation of − 0.686% and 6.18%, respectively. The validated range of the proposed correlation is: 0.6 cm ≤ D ≤ 6.7 cm, 0.0338 m/s ≤ 〈jg〉 ≤ 159 m/s, and 0.0226 m/s ≤ 〈jf〉 ≤ 8.46 m/s.

Abstract Image

垂直管道中向上共流两相流的全范围漂移通量相关
在核热水力分析中,竖直管道上向两相流的空隙率预测是至关重要的。由于双流体模型可以通过界面传递项处理相间的运动和热不平衡,因此可以作为一维核热工系统分析程序的平台。精确模拟界面动量传递项中面积平均界面阻力对准确预测孔隙分数至关重要。漂移通量模型将气液混合物视为伪单一流体,但允许液气之间的滑动,在基于双流体模型的程序中广泛用于预测面积平均界面阻力。在漂移通量模型中,分布参数和漂移速度是形成面积平均界面阻力的两个关键参数。在漂移通量模型的其他应用中,一维漂移通量模型被用作一种简单的代数工具,直接从边界条件(如表面气体和液体速度)预测一维空隙率。本文分析建立了分布参数与漂移速度的全范围漂移通量相关关系,适用于垂直管道中向上两相流的孔隙分数为0 ~ 1。首先,考虑空隙率和混合物体积通量的相似分布,估计了过渡到分离两相流开始时的临界面积平均空隙率;建立了纯分散两相流、过渡两相流和分离两相流向上共流两相流分布参数和漂移速度(或漂移通量相关)的本构方程;为了验证新的相关性,从9个来源收集了419个垂直管道中向上两相流的实验数据。将实验结果与新建立的全量程漂通量关联计算的孔隙分数进行比较,结果表明,该关联的预测性能优于现有的漂通量关联,平均相对偏差和平均绝对相对偏差分别达到- 0.686%和6.18%。所提出相关性的验证范围为:0.6 cm≤D≤6.7 cm, 0.0338 m/s≤< jg >≤159 m/s, 0.0226 m/s≤< jf >≤8.46 m/s。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信