Ghanbar Tavassoli, Tahereh Samimi, Hamidreza Farrokh-eslamlou, Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar, Elahe Gozali, Toomas Timpka, Bahlol Rahimi
{"title":"The Effect of mHealth Interventions on Early Childhood Development: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ghanbar Tavassoli, Tahereh Samimi, Hamidreza Farrokh-eslamlou, Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar, Elahe Gozali, Toomas Timpka, Bahlol Rahimi","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/9566241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Early childhood development shapes lifelong health and learning, with 90% of brain architecture formed by age 5. Mobile health shows promise in this area. We conducted a systematic review to assess mobile health use in early childhood development.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The review followed PRISMA guidelines, with a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language articles from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2024. To reduce publication bias, gray literature—including conference proceedings and Cochrane database—was systematically searched. The eligibility criteria were established using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, and studies that did not meet the criteria were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed study quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Nine studies from 2019 to 2022 met the criteria, assessing motor skills (4), cognitive abilities (2), language development (4), and social–emotional aspects (3). One study addressed all four developmental domains, another focused on language and social–emotional development, and the remaining studies examined a single domain. One study utilized social media platforms, while the others used mobile apps. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool rated four studies as “good” and five as “moderate.” Only one study was conducted in low- and middle-income countries. All the included studies reported positive impacts of mobile health on developmental domains, some statistically significant. Overall, few studies exist on mobile health in child development, mostly from high-income countries with small samples and laboratory settings. Positive effects were reported across domains, but motor improvements were limited to skills without advancing development levels. Using assistive devices improved outcome accuracy and clarified intervention effects.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Few studies have been conducted in the field of mHealth in ECD. There is a need for further research applying the Nurturing Care Framework (NCF)—particularly in low-income countries—to better understand the effectiveness of mobile health interventions in diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/9566241","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/9566241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Early childhood development shapes lifelong health and learning, with 90% of brain architecture formed by age 5. Mobile health shows promise in this area. We conducted a systematic review to assess mobile health use in early childhood development.
Methods: The review followed PRISMA guidelines, with a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language articles from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2024. To reduce publication bias, gray literature—including conference proceedings and Cochrane database—was systematically searched. The eligibility criteria were established using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, and studies that did not meet the criteria were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed study quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results: Nine studies from 2019 to 2022 met the criteria, assessing motor skills (4), cognitive abilities (2), language development (4), and social–emotional aspects (3). One study addressed all four developmental domains, another focused on language and social–emotional development, and the remaining studies examined a single domain. One study utilized social media platforms, while the others used mobile apps. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool rated four studies as “good” and five as “moderate.” Only one study was conducted in low- and middle-income countries. All the included studies reported positive impacts of mobile health on developmental domains, some statistically significant. Overall, few studies exist on mobile health in child development, mostly from high-income countries with small samples and laboratory settings. Positive effects were reported across domains, but motor improvements were limited to skills without advancing development levels. Using assistive devices improved outcome accuracy and clarified intervention effects.
Conclusion: Few studies have been conducted in the field of mHealth in ECD. There is a need for further research applying the Nurturing Care Framework (NCF)—particularly in low-income countries—to better understand the effectiveness of mobile health interventions in diverse settings.
目的:儿童早期发育影响终身健康和学习,90%的大脑结构在5岁前形成。移动医疗显示了这一领域的前景。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估儿童早期发展中移动医疗的使用情况。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南,综合检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,检索2000年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间的英文论文。为了减少发表偏倚,系统地检索了灰色文献,包括会议论文集和Cochrane数据库。使用人口、干预、比较和结果框架建立资格标准,排除不符合标准的研究。两名独立评审员使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量。结果:从2019年到2022年,有9项研究符合标准,评估了运动技能(4项)、认知能力(2项)、语言发展(4项)和社会情感方面(3项)。一项研究涉及所有四个发展领域,另一项研究关注语言和社会情感发展,其余的研究只关注一个领域。一项研究使用社交媒体平台,而其他研究使用移动应用程序。混合方法评估工具将四项研究评为“良好”,五项为“中等”。只有一项研究在低收入和中等收入国家进行。所有纳入的研究都报告了流动医疗对发展领域的积极影响,其中一些具有统计学意义。总体而言,关于儿童发展中的移动保健的研究很少,主要来自高收入国家的小样本和实验室环境。据报道,在各个领域都有积极的影响,但运动的改善仅限于技能,而没有提高发展水平。使用辅助装置可提高结果的准确性并明确干预效果。结论:移动医疗在幼儿发展中的应用研究较少。有必要进一步研究应用养育护理框架(NCF),特别是在低收入国家,以便更好地了解流动卫生干预措施在不同环境中的有效性。
期刊介绍:
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.