{"title":"Breaking boundaries: discontinuum failure analysis of dry-joint masonry using physics engine models","authors":"A. Wang , B. Pulatsu , S. Andrews , D. Malomo","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Discontinuum approaches, including the Distinct Element Method (DEM), are well-established for simulating the failure of dry-joint unreinforced masonry (URM) structures, particularly under in-plane (IP) shear-compression and out-of-plane (OOP) loading. However, they may be computationally intensive, with building-scale DEM analyses requiring up to 3 days for 15 s of seismic loading. This paper breaks boundaries between structural engineering and computer science by presenting the first systematic evaluation of PyBullet, an open-source physics engine based on Bullet Physics – originally conceived for visually plausible virtual animations – for simulating the mechanical response and collapse of dry-joint URM assemblies at different scales. Leveraging PyBullet’s rigid body algorithms, contact models, and efficient constraint solvers, 3D simulations were performed for IP shear-compression walls, settlement-induced damage in interlocking panels, and OOP tilting of URM. Results were benchmarked against experimental data and established discontinuum models – PyBullet predicted peak loads within + 16 % of DEM for IP shear-compression walls. Numerical stability was maintained with time steps in the order of 0.001 s, and full simulations completed within 5 min – up to 6 times faster than DEM. OOP tilting analyses reproduced expected collapse modes (diagonal cracking, overturning) with critical collapse angles underestimated by up to 32 %, largely due to premature block slippage linked to contact stiffness and friction force coupling. Settlement-induced failure in interlocking panels showed good agreement with experimentally observed failure patterns, with ultimate displacements within ±3 % for non-interlocking cases. The study demonstrates that PyBullet offers a computationally efficient alternative for dry-joint URM analysis, providing reduced runtimes and acceptable predictive accuracy, especially for preliminary or large-scale probabilistic assessments. Further refinement of contact stiffness calibration strategies would enhance predictive consistency, supporting the adoption of physics engines as viable alternatives to conventional discontinuum methods for rapid masonry collapse and debris simulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"342 ","pages":"Article 120916"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625013070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Discontinuum approaches, including the Distinct Element Method (DEM), are well-established for simulating the failure of dry-joint unreinforced masonry (URM) structures, particularly under in-plane (IP) shear-compression and out-of-plane (OOP) loading. However, they may be computationally intensive, with building-scale DEM analyses requiring up to 3 days for 15 s of seismic loading. This paper breaks boundaries between structural engineering and computer science by presenting the first systematic evaluation of PyBullet, an open-source physics engine based on Bullet Physics – originally conceived for visually plausible virtual animations – for simulating the mechanical response and collapse of dry-joint URM assemblies at different scales. Leveraging PyBullet’s rigid body algorithms, contact models, and efficient constraint solvers, 3D simulations were performed for IP shear-compression walls, settlement-induced damage in interlocking panels, and OOP tilting of URM. Results were benchmarked against experimental data and established discontinuum models – PyBullet predicted peak loads within + 16 % of DEM for IP shear-compression walls. Numerical stability was maintained with time steps in the order of 0.001 s, and full simulations completed within 5 min – up to 6 times faster than DEM. OOP tilting analyses reproduced expected collapse modes (diagonal cracking, overturning) with critical collapse angles underestimated by up to 32 %, largely due to premature block slippage linked to contact stiffness and friction force coupling. Settlement-induced failure in interlocking panels showed good agreement with experimentally observed failure patterns, with ultimate displacements within ±3 % for non-interlocking cases. The study demonstrates that PyBullet offers a computationally efficient alternative for dry-joint URM analysis, providing reduced runtimes and acceptable predictive accuracy, especially for preliminary or large-scale probabilistic assessments. Further refinement of contact stiffness calibration strategies would enhance predictive consistency, supporting the adoption of physics engines as viable alternatives to conventional discontinuum methods for rapid masonry collapse and debris simulations.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.