{"title":"The equivalent linear nature of the dynamic Soil-Foundation-Superstructure Interaction (SFSI) of bridge-piers on caisson foundations","authors":"Stefano Stacul, Nunziante Squeglia","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a simplified approach for evaluating the Foundation Input Motion (FIM) of embedded caissons, considering the complex interaction between the caisson and the surrounding soil. The proposed solution is based on a parametric study using the finite difference code FLAC3D. The analysis explores different embedment-to-radius aspect ratios while incorporating the nonlinear response of the surrounding soil. In FLAC3D the caisson was modelled as a cylindrical element with the mechanical properties of concrete, while the soil was modelled using both a linear viscoelastic and a nonlinear constitutive model. Numerical results in the nonlinear soil regime were compared with both the proposed solution and equivalent linear numerical results, where mobilized values of soil shear modulus and damping ratio (inferred from free-field analyses) were applied. These comparisons shed light on the equivalent linear nature of the soil-caisson interaction. Additionally, several soil-caisson-bridge pier system configurations were studied in linear viscoelastic, equivalent linear, and nonlinear soil regimes. A modified version of the “substructure approach”, in which the FIM was evaluated with the proposed solution, was applied to derive the maximum acceleration of the bridge deck and the drift between the deck and the caisson and the results were compared with those obtained with FLAC3D. The results confirm that the modified “substructure approach” captures the dynamic response of soil-caisson-bridge pier systems. Furthermore, as observed in the soil-caisson interaction case, the findings support the equivalent linear nature of the soil-caisson-bridge pier interaction. The proposed solution was also compared with other methodologies available in the literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 109664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a simplified approach for evaluating the Foundation Input Motion (FIM) of embedded caissons, considering the complex interaction between the caisson and the surrounding soil. The proposed solution is based on a parametric study using the finite difference code FLAC3D. The analysis explores different embedment-to-radius aspect ratios while incorporating the nonlinear response of the surrounding soil. In FLAC3D the caisson was modelled as a cylindrical element with the mechanical properties of concrete, while the soil was modelled using both a linear viscoelastic and a nonlinear constitutive model. Numerical results in the nonlinear soil regime were compared with both the proposed solution and equivalent linear numerical results, where mobilized values of soil shear modulus and damping ratio (inferred from free-field analyses) were applied. These comparisons shed light on the equivalent linear nature of the soil-caisson interaction. Additionally, several soil-caisson-bridge pier system configurations were studied in linear viscoelastic, equivalent linear, and nonlinear soil regimes. A modified version of the “substructure approach”, in which the FIM was evaluated with the proposed solution, was applied to derive the maximum acceleration of the bridge deck and the drift between the deck and the caisson and the results were compared with those obtained with FLAC3D. The results confirm that the modified “substructure approach” captures the dynamic response of soil-caisson-bridge pier systems. Furthermore, as observed in the soil-caisson interaction case, the findings support the equivalent linear nature of the soil-caisson-bridge pier interaction. The proposed solution was also compared with other methodologies available in the literature.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering.
Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.