Global synthesis of nitrogen management in sugarcane systems: Decoding climate-soil-management drivers of Brazil-China contrasts

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xiaomai Yuan , Shengsen Zhou , Fumin Wei , Li Ma , Yongfeng Sun , Dingjiao Peng , Run Liang , Yibao Luo , Baoshan Chen , Wei Yao , Ziting Wang
{"title":"Global synthesis of nitrogen management in sugarcane systems: Decoding climate-soil-management drivers of Brazil-China contrasts","authors":"Xiaomai Yuan ,&nbsp;Shengsen Zhou ,&nbsp;Fumin Wei ,&nbsp;Li Ma ,&nbsp;Yongfeng Sun ,&nbsp;Dingjiao Peng ,&nbsp;Run Liang ,&nbsp;Yibao Luo ,&nbsp;Baoshan Chen ,&nbsp;Wei Yao ,&nbsp;Ziting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Global sugarcane systems exhibit critical N management disparities; Brazil applies only one-third to one-seventh of the N fertilizer amount used in China, but achieves 30–50 % higher yields. Decoding these mechanisms is critical for closing yield gaps and optimizing global N-efficient production.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the response of sugarcane cropping systems to N fertilizers across different countries and to provide optimized N management strategies for sugarcane production.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We synthesized 967 observations from 81 articles published between 2000 and 2023. By differentiating data between Brazil and China, this study employed subgroup, random forest, and regression analyses to quantify how climatic conditions, soil properties, and agronomic practices influence the N fertilization responsiveness of sugarcane.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Synthetic N fertilization increased cane yield (+20.0 %) and N uptake (+59.6 %) in Brazil compared to + 35.2 % and + 82.5 % in China, respectively, with Chinese soils exhibiting greater NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> contents. Brazilian systems showed broader variability in mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), soil organic matter (SOM), and soil total N (STN) than Chinese systems. MAT and STN levels emerged as the primary drivers of cane yield and N uptake responses in Brazil, respectively, in contrast to STN levels and N application rate dominance in China. Optimal thresholds were MAT &gt; 20 ℃ and MAP &gt; 1300 mm (Brazil) versus SOM &lt; 30 g·kg<sup>−1</sup> and STN &lt; 0.5 g·kg<sup>−1</sup> (China). N use efficiency (NUE) correlated positively with STN in Brazil (N rate-independent) but inversely in China. The threshold for partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) in Brazil and China occurred at N fertilizer application rates of 71.6 and 159.1 kg N·ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, while the response threshold for cane yield appeared at 140 and 276 kg N·ha<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Chinese sugarcane showed a stronger N response than Brazilian sugarcane. Brazilian soils with high SOM maintain inherent N mineralization compared to China's SOM-deficient systems with constrained native N availability. Brazilian N management requires climate-adapted approaches, whereas China requires soil health restoration through organic C and N enrichment to boost N efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This meta-analysis systematically compared the N supply patterns in Brazilian and Chinese sugarcane cropping systems, revealing that soil N provisioning is a critical determinant for sustaining high and stable yields, while providing actionable insights for optimizing global sugarcane N management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 110075"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025003405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Global sugarcane systems exhibit critical N management disparities; Brazil applies only one-third to one-seventh of the N fertilizer amount used in China, but achieves 30–50 % higher yields. Decoding these mechanisms is critical for closing yield gaps and optimizing global N-efficient production.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the response of sugarcane cropping systems to N fertilizers across different countries and to provide optimized N management strategies for sugarcane production.

Methods

We synthesized 967 observations from 81 articles published between 2000 and 2023. By differentiating data between Brazil and China, this study employed subgroup, random forest, and regression analyses to quantify how climatic conditions, soil properties, and agronomic practices influence the N fertilization responsiveness of sugarcane.

Results

Synthetic N fertilization increased cane yield (+20.0 %) and N uptake (+59.6 %) in Brazil compared to + 35.2 % and + 82.5 % in China, respectively, with Chinese soils exhibiting greater NO3- and NH4+ contents. Brazilian systems showed broader variability in mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), soil organic matter (SOM), and soil total N (STN) than Chinese systems. MAT and STN levels emerged as the primary drivers of cane yield and N uptake responses in Brazil, respectively, in contrast to STN levels and N application rate dominance in China. Optimal thresholds were MAT > 20 ℃ and MAP > 1300 mm (Brazil) versus SOM < 30 g·kg−1 and STN < 0.5 g·kg−1 (China). N use efficiency (NUE) correlated positively with STN in Brazil (N rate-independent) but inversely in China. The threshold for partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) in Brazil and China occurred at N fertilizer application rates of 71.6 and 159.1 kg N·ha−1, respectively, while the response threshold for cane yield appeared at 140 and 276 kg N·ha−1.

Conclusion

Chinese sugarcane showed a stronger N response than Brazilian sugarcane. Brazilian soils with high SOM maintain inherent N mineralization compared to China's SOM-deficient systems with constrained native N availability. Brazilian N management requires climate-adapted approaches, whereas China requires soil health restoration through organic C and N enrichment to boost N efficiency.

Significance

This meta-analysis systematically compared the N supply patterns in Brazilian and Chinese sugarcane cropping systems, revealing that soil N provisioning is a critical determinant for sustaining high and stable yields, while providing actionable insights for optimizing global sugarcane N management strategies.
甘蔗系统氮管理的全球综合:解读巴西-中国对比的气候-土壤管理驱动因素
全球甘蔗系统显示出严重的氮管理差异;巴西的氮肥用量仅为中国的三分之一至七分之一,但产量却高出30 - 50% %。破解这些机制对于缩小产量差距和优化全球氮素高效生产至关重要。目的研究不同国家甘蔗种植制度对氮肥的响应,为甘蔗生产提供优化的氮肥管理策略。方法综合2000 ~ 2023年间发表的81篇论文中的967条观察结果。通过区分巴西和中国的数据,本研究采用亚组、随机森林和回归分析来量化气候条件、土壤性质和农艺措施如何影响甘蔗的氮肥响应性。结果巴西的甘蔗产量(+20.0 %)和氮素吸收量(+59.6 %)高于中国的+ 35.2 %和+ 82.5 %,且中国土壤NO3-和NH4+含量更高。巴西系统在年平均温度(MAT)、年平均降水(MAP)、土壤有机质(SOM)和土壤全氮(STN)方面的变异性比中国系统更大。与中国的施氮水平和施氮量主导相比,巴西的土壤基质水平和施氮量水平分别是甘蔗产量和氮吸收响应的主要驱动因素。最佳阈值为MAT >; 20℃和MAP >; 1300 mm(巴西),而SOM <; 30 g·kg - 1和STN <; 0.5 g·kg - 1(中国)。氮素利用效率(NUE)与STN在巴西呈显著正相关(与氮素率无关),在中国呈显著负相关。在巴西和中国,氮肥施用量分别为71.6和159.1 kg N·ha - 1时,氮素部分要素生产率(PFPN)的阈值出现,而甘蔗产量的响应阈值为140和276 kg N·ha - 1。结论中国甘蔗对氮素的响应强于巴西甘蔗。与中国缺乏SOM的土壤系统相比,高SOM的巴西土壤保持固有的N矿化。巴西的氮管理需要适应气候的方法,而中国需要通过有机碳和氮的富集来恢复土壤健康,以提高氮的效率。本荟萃分析系统地比较了巴西和中国甘蔗种植系统的氮素供应模式,揭示了土壤氮素供应是维持高产和稳定的关键决定因素,同时为优化全球甘蔗氮素管理策略提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信