Reflecting mixed method research on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene among unhoused people. Insights into a case study from Germany

IF 2.7
C. Anthonj , S.N. Stanglow , J. Flacke , A. Leinen , C. Butsch , F. Meissner , S. Jendrek , J. Martinez
{"title":"Reflecting mixed method research on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene among unhoused people. Insights into a case study from Germany","authors":"C. Anthonj ,&nbsp;S.N. Stanglow ,&nbsp;J. Flacke ,&nbsp;A. Leinen ,&nbsp;C. Butsch ,&nbsp;F. Meissner ,&nbsp;S. Jendrek ,&nbsp;J. Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2025.100139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>People experiencing homelessness and the drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) challenges that they are facing are neither well-represented in academic literature, nor in national and international statistics. This dynamic and often invisible vulnerable group is commonly undercounted in national surveys and official statistics are often based on household units, thus, not accounting for unsheltered individuals. Living at the margins, they are often out of reach to be involved in outreach efforts and interventions, and these systemic inequities increase their exposure to risks, while decreasing access to assistance to mitigate and reduce them.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a mixed method case study carried out in Germany in 2023, we involved 45 persons experiencing homelessness. We first provide an overview of our study design capturing spatial and non-spatial, individual and collective information through research methods such as in-depth interviews, walking interviews, focus group discussions, collaborative mapping (digital versus on paper), arts-based research, mental mapping, photovoice and shadowing. We then reflect on their feasibility and usefulness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In-depth interviews were most feasible to implement, captured individual, cross-sectional, information and lead to the best results. Participatory methods, collaborative mapping and group discussions were more difficult to implement, yet lead to highly relevant findings. Longitudinal approaches and mental mapping methods were most difficult to realize. Photovoice could not be implemented at all. Shadowing resulted in findings that were only of medium relevance, yet, were very helpful in establishing an improved relationship with the target population, and building trust.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and recommendations</h3><div>The multifaceted challenges of unhoused individuals require awareness of their lived realities, great flexibility, time, trust, relationships, openness and adaptations, and research designs tailored to their life realities. Our insights can enable decision-makers to design targeted interventions and have broader applicability among other populations and contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049225000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

People experiencing homelessness and the drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) challenges that they are facing are neither well-represented in academic literature, nor in national and international statistics. This dynamic and often invisible vulnerable group is commonly undercounted in national surveys and official statistics are often based on household units, thus, not accounting for unsheltered individuals. Living at the margins, they are often out of reach to be involved in outreach efforts and interventions, and these systemic inequities increase their exposure to risks, while decreasing access to assistance to mitigate and reduce them.

Methods

Using a mixed method case study carried out in Germany in 2023, we involved 45 persons experiencing homelessness. We first provide an overview of our study design capturing spatial and non-spatial, individual and collective information through research methods such as in-depth interviews, walking interviews, focus group discussions, collaborative mapping (digital versus on paper), arts-based research, mental mapping, photovoice and shadowing. We then reflect on their feasibility and usefulness.

Results

In-depth interviews were most feasible to implement, captured individual, cross-sectional, information and lead to the best results. Participatory methods, collaborative mapping and group discussions were more difficult to implement, yet lead to highly relevant findings. Longitudinal approaches and mental mapping methods were most difficult to realize. Photovoice could not be implemented at all. Shadowing resulted in findings that were only of medium relevance, yet, were very helpful in establishing an improved relationship with the target population, and building trust.

Conclusions and recommendations

The multifaceted challenges of unhoused individuals require awareness of their lived realities, great flexibility, time, trust, relationships, openness and adaptations, and research designs tailored to their life realities. Our insights can enable decision-makers to design targeted interventions and have broader applicability among other populations and contexts.

Abstract Image

反映了对无家可归者的饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生的混合方法研究。对德国案例研究的见解
经历无家可归的人以及他们所面临的饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生方面的挑战在学术文献以及国家和国际统计数据中都没有得到充分体现。在国家调查中,这一动态的、往往看不见的弱势群体通常被低估,官方统计往往以家庭单位为基础,因此没有考虑到无家可归的个人。他们生活在边缘,往往无法参与外联工作和干预措施,这些系统性不平等增加了他们面临的风险,同时减少了他们获得缓解和减少风险的援助的机会。方法采用2023年在德国进行的混合方法案例研究,我们涉及45名无家可归者。我们首先概述了我们的研究设计,通过深入访谈、步行访谈、焦点小组讨论、协作测绘(数字与纸上)、基于艺术的研究、心理测绘、照片语音和阴影等研究方法捕捉空间和非空间、个人和集体信息。然后对其可行性和实用性进行反思。结果深度访谈是最可行的,能捕获个体、横截面的信息,效果最好。参与式方法、协作绘图和小组讨论更难实施,但却产生了高度相关的发现。纵向方法和心理映射方法最难实现。Photovoice根本无法实现。跟踪的结果只有中等相关性,但对与目标人群建立更好的关系和建立信任非常有帮助。结论和建议无家可归者面临多方面的挑战,需要了解他们的生活现实、极大的灵活性、时间、信任、关系、开放性和适应性,以及针对他们的生活现实量身定制的研究设计。我们的见解可以使决策者能够设计有针对性的干预措施,并在其他人群和环境中具有更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信