Yazhou Hu , Timothy P. Topper , Luke C. Strotz , Yue Liang , Fan Liu , Rao Fu , Baopeng Song , Zhao Wang , Bing Pan , Zhifei Zhang
{"title":"Preservation potential of Cambrian small shelly fossils in different microfacies, North China","authors":"Yazhou Hu , Timothy P. Topper , Luke C. Strotz , Yue Liang , Fan Liu , Rao Fu , Baopeng Song , Zhao Wang , Bing Pan , Zhifei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small shelly fossils (SSFs) have long been recognized as important to the studies of both metazoan evolution and the onset of biomineralization during the Cambrian radiation. The marked decline in the occurrence, diversity and abundance of SSFs in the middle to late Cambrian, when compared with the early Cambrian, has often been regarded as a result of the closure of a phosphatization window. Despite this, there have been numerous and consistent reports of SSFs from the middle Cambrian and younger deposits. To identify possible factors influencing SSF preservation, five microfacies including bioclastic limestone, flat-pebble conglomerates with bioclasts, hummocky cross-stratified grainstone with bioclasts, bioclastic grainstone in hardgrounds and glauconite bioclastic wackstone-packstone, from Cambrian Series 2 to Miaolingian in North China are compared to assess how differences in lithology impact the preservation potential of SSFs. Our results, based on 35,161 SSF specimens from deposits across six sections, suggest that there are still abundant and diverse SSFs in the middle Cambrian of North China preserved in ways not exclusively reliant on the presence of phosphate and that SSF preservation can be linked to the differences in microfacies in the early to middle Cambrian of North China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"16 5","pages":"Article 102108"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Small shelly fossils (SSFs) have long been recognized as important to the studies of both metazoan evolution and the onset of biomineralization during the Cambrian radiation. The marked decline in the occurrence, diversity and abundance of SSFs in the middle to late Cambrian, when compared with the early Cambrian, has often been regarded as a result of the closure of a phosphatization window. Despite this, there have been numerous and consistent reports of SSFs from the middle Cambrian and younger deposits. To identify possible factors influencing SSF preservation, five microfacies including bioclastic limestone, flat-pebble conglomerates with bioclasts, hummocky cross-stratified grainstone with bioclasts, bioclastic grainstone in hardgrounds and glauconite bioclastic wackstone-packstone, from Cambrian Series 2 to Miaolingian in North China are compared to assess how differences in lithology impact the preservation potential of SSFs. Our results, based on 35,161 SSF specimens from deposits across six sections, suggest that there are still abundant and diverse SSFs in the middle Cambrian of North China preserved in ways not exclusively reliant on the presence of phosphate and that SSF preservation can be linked to the differences in microfacies in the early to middle Cambrian of North China.
Geoscience frontiersEarth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.