Optimal design of fixed-route and demand-responsive transit with a dynamic stop strategy

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yunyu Zhang , Sida Luo , Aojie Zu , Hong Ji , Liujiang Kang , Chunfu Shao
{"title":"Optimal design of fixed-route and demand-responsive transit with a dynamic stop strategy","authors":"Yunyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Sida Luo ,&nbsp;Aojie Zu ,&nbsp;Hong Ji ,&nbsp;Liujiang Kang ,&nbsp;Chunfu Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the high detour costs associated with Demand-Responsive Transit (DRT) when feeding Fixed-Route Transit (FRT), this paper proposes an integration between FRT and DRT based on a dynamic stop strategy. This strategy allows passengers to, with an acceptable walking distance, connect their origins/destinations with dynamic stops. These stops have spacings that are randomly and uniformly distributed and are assigned to passengers upon their requests for DRT services. In this way, DRT does not need to pick up/drop off passengers at their origins/destinations, hence reducing the detour distance especially when the origins/destinations are far from FRT stops. Passengers may walk, take DRT directly, or combine the two to access FRT services. To deal with the modeling complexity that arises from the relationship between the three feeder modes, we divide the catchment zone of a FRT stop into different areas corresponding to different feeder modes, and evaluate transit agency and user costs based on the shapes of these areas using a parsimonious continuum approach. The optimal design for the integrated system is then formulated as a mixed-integer program that aims to minimize the total system cost, a combination of agency and user costs. Numerical experiments are conducted to compare the performance of the proposed system with two related transit systems in different scenarios. The results show that the proposed system could reduce agency costs by over 15% across different transit demand levels at the expense of minor changes in system costs, and demonstrate strong robustness to various potential changes in future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104581"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the high detour costs associated with Demand-Responsive Transit (DRT) when feeding Fixed-Route Transit (FRT), this paper proposes an integration between FRT and DRT based on a dynamic stop strategy. This strategy allows passengers to, with an acceptable walking distance, connect their origins/destinations with dynamic stops. These stops have spacings that are randomly and uniformly distributed and are assigned to passengers upon their requests for DRT services. In this way, DRT does not need to pick up/drop off passengers at their origins/destinations, hence reducing the detour distance especially when the origins/destinations are far from FRT stops. Passengers may walk, take DRT directly, or combine the two to access FRT services. To deal with the modeling complexity that arises from the relationship between the three feeder modes, we divide the catchment zone of a FRT stop into different areas corresponding to different feeder modes, and evaluate transit agency and user costs based on the shapes of these areas using a parsimonious continuum approach. The optimal design for the integrated system is then formulated as a mixed-integer program that aims to minimize the total system cost, a combination of agency and user costs. Numerical experiments are conducted to compare the performance of the proposed system with two related transit systems in different scenarios. The results show that the proposed system could reduce agency costs by over 15% across different transit demand levels at the expense of minor changes in system costs, and demonstrate strong robustness to various potential changes in future.
基于动态停车策略的固定路线需求响应公交优化设计
为解决需求响应交通(DRT)在馈送固定路线交通(FRT)时绕行成本高的问题,本文提出了一种基于动态停车策略的快速响应交通(FRT)与固定路线交通(DRT)的整合方案。这种策略允许乘客在可接受的步行距离内,将出发地/目的地与动态站点连接起来。这些站点的间隔是随机和均匀分布的,并根据乘客对DRT服务的要求分配给他们。这样,快速公交就不需要在始发地/目的地接送乘客,从而减少了绕行的距离,特别是当始发地/目的地远离快速公交站点时。乘客可以步行,直接乘坐快速公交,或将两者结合使用快速公交服务。为了解决三种馈线模式之间的关系所带来的建模复杂性,我们将FRT站点的集水区划分为不同的馈线模式对应的不同区域,并基于这些区域的形状使用简约连续体方法评估运输机构和用户成本。然后将集成系统的最佳设计制定为混合整数方案,旨在使系统总成本(代理成本和用户成本的组合)最小化。通过数值实验,比较了该系统与两种相关的公交系统在不同场景下的性能。结果表明,该系统可以在不同交通需求水平下降低15%以上的代理成本,且系统成本变化较小,对未来各种潜在变化具有较强的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信