Víctor M. Mora-Cuesta , Diego Alejandro Murillo-Brito , Pedro José Argos-Vélez , David Iturbe-Fernández , Sara Naranjo-Gozalo , Laura Sánchez-Moreno , Sandra Tello-Mena , Loreto Berjón-de la Vega , Sheila Izquierdo-Cuervo , Claudia Poo-Fernández , Daniela Andia-Torrico , Pilar Alonso-Lecue , María A. Ballesteros-Sanz , Roberto J. Mons-Lera , José M Cifrián-Martínez
{"title":"Impact of lung resections on lung transplant grafts due to size discrepancy","authors":"Víctor M. Mora-Cuesta , Diego Alejandro Murillo-Brito , Pedro José Argos-Vélez , David Iturbe-Fernández , Sara Naranjo-Gozalo , Laura Sánchez-Moreno , Sandra Tello-Mena , Loreto Berjón-de la Vega , Sheila Izquierdo-Cuervo , Claudia Poo-Fernández , Daniela Andia-Torrico , Pilar Alonso-Lecue , María A. Ballesteros-Sanz , Roberto J. Mons-Lera , José M Cifrián-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lung transplantation (LT) is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with advanced respiratory diseases. However, the impact of size discrepancy between donor and recipient remains controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the impact of lung graft volume reduction due to size mismatch between donor and recipient.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted at a single reference center, including all LT procedures performed between January 1, 2015, and July 30, 2024. Surgical protocols were reviewed, and the need for graft volume reduction was recorded. The decision to perform graft reduction was made intraoperatively by the lead surgeon.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 420 patients were included. Lung graft resection was performed in 14 cases (3.3 %). Patients requiring graft resection had longer operative times, prolonged intubation and ICU stays, and increased tracheostomy requirements. The donor-to-recipient predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) ratio was significantly higher among patients requiring resection. While 5-year survival was not significantly different, 1- and 3-year survival rates were worse for patients requiring resection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lung graft resection due to donor-recipient size discrepancy can be a viable option for suitable recipients, although it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Given the small sample size (14 patients), these findings should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed to confirm these results. Early referral to transplant centers and careful donor-recipient matching are crucial to minimize the need for graft resection and improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 180-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795632500158X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Lung transplantation (LT) is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with advanced respiratory diseases. However, the impact of size discrepancy between donor and recipient remains controversial.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the impact of lung graft volume reduction due to size mismatch between donor and recipient.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted at a single reference center, including all LT procedures performed between January 1, 2015, and July 30, 2024. Surgical protocols were reviewed, and the need for graft volume reduction was recorded. The decision to perform graft reduction was made intraoperatively by the lead surgeon.
Results
A total of 420 patients were included. Lung graft resection was performed in 14 cases (3.3 %). Patients requiring graft resection had longer operative times, prolonged intubation and ICU stays, and increased tracheostomy requirements. The donor-to-recipient predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) ratio was significantly higher among patients requiring resection. While 5-year survival was not significantly different, 1- and 3-year survival rates were worse for patients requiring resection.
Conclusion
Lung graft resection due to donor-recipient size discrepancy can be a viable option for suitable recipients, although it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Given the small sample size (14 patients), these findings should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed to confirm these results. Early referral to transplant centers and careful donor-recipient matching are crucial to minimize the need for graft resection and improve outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders.
The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.