The promise of computer-based literacy learning: the effect of ELCII on kindergarteners’ inference skill development

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Joseph Burey, Jasmine Kim, Nidhi Kohli, Kristen McMaster, Panayiota Kendeou
{"title":"The promise of computer-based literacy learning: the effect of ELCII on kindergarteners’ inference skill development","authors":"Joseph Burey,&nbsp;Jasmine Kim,&nbsp;Nidhi Kohli,&nbsp;Kristen McMaster,&nbsp;Panayiota Kendeou","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We evaluated the efficacy of Early Language Comprehension Individualized Instruction (ELCII), a supplemental computer-based early language comprehension intervention, in improving kindergarten students’ inference making performance. In Study 1, students completed ELCII modules over nine weeks, whereas a business-as-usual control group engaged in typical language comprehension instruction. Because of school closures due to the onset of COVID-19, the study was interrupted, and we were not able to complete implementation and post-testing. As a result, the analysis is focused on more deeply understanding the performance of the intervention group only. To further evaluate efficacy, we followed-up with a small-scale implementation a year later. In Study 2, students completed ELCII modules over five weeks and their performance was compared to that of a business-as-usual control group. Taken together, results indicated that all students, on average, improved in their inference generation performance over time and that growth did not differ across demographic subgroups. However, results also highlighted gaps that were present at the onset of the program, and unfortunately continued to persist. Results also indicated that the scaffolding and feedback components of the program were effective, with students who had lower initial inference performance benefiting more from ELCII. The findings from these studies suggest that ELCII is a feasible and beneficial program to support early language comprehension and inference making in kindergarten students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of Early Language Comprehension Individualized Instruction (ELCII), a supplemental computer-based early language comprehension intervention, in improving kindergarten students’ inference making performance. In Study 1, students completed ELCII modules over nine weeks, whereas a business-as-usual control group engaged in typical language comprehension instruction. Because of school closures due to the onset of COVID-19, the study was interrupted, and we were not able to complete implementation and post-testing. As a result, the analysis is focused on more deeply understanding the performance of the intervention group only. To further evaluate efficacy, we followed-up with a small-scale implementation a year later. In Study 2, students completed ELCII modules over five weeks and their performance was compared to that of a business-as-usual control group. Taken together, results indicated that all students, on average, improved in their inference generation performance over time and that growth did not differ across demographic subgroups. However, results also highlighted gaps that were present at the onset of the program, and unfortunately continued to persist. Results also indicated that the scaffolding and feedback components of the program were effective, with students who had lower initial inference performance benefiting more from ELCII. The findings from these studies suggest that ELCII is a feasible and beneficial program to support early language comprehension and inference making in kindergarten students.
计算机识字学习的前景:ELCII对幼儿园儿童推理技能发展的影响
本研究评估了早期语言理解个性化教学(ELCII)在提高幼儿园学生推理能力方面的效果。在研究1中,学生们在九周的时间内完成了ELCII模块,而一个照常工作的对照组则从事典型的语言理解教学。由于新冠肺炎爆发导致学校关闭,研究中断,我们无法完成实施和后测试。因此,分析的重点是更深入地了解干预组的表现。为了进一步评估疗效,我们在一年后进行了小规模的后续实施。在研究2中,学生们在五周内完成了ELCII模块,并将他们的表现与正常对照组的表现进行了比较。综上所述,结果表明,随着时间的推移,所有学生的推理能力平均都有所提高,而且这种增长在人口统计亚组之间没有差异。然而,结果也突出了在项目开始时就存在的差距,不幸的是,差距继续存在。结果还表明,程序中的脚手架和反馈组件是有效的,初始推理性能较低的学生从ELCII中受益更多。这些研究的结果表明,ELCII是一个可行的和有益的项目,以支持幼儿早期的语言理解和推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信