Jinling Guo , Junlian Gao , Kejia Yan , Bo Zhang , He Liu
{"title":"Castles in the Sky: Revisiting the global methane pledge","authors":"Jinling Guo , Junlian Gao , Kejia Yan , Bo Zhang , He Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH<sub>4</sub> reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH<sub>4</sub> reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 114785"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The entry into force of the Global Methane Pledge (GMP) signifies a pivotal shift in climate governance, elevating methane (CH4) mitigation from a peripheral concern to a central global priority. While the GMP has significantly raised global ambition regarding CH4 reduction, the growing number of participations has yet to close the gap between pledges and actual implementation. This discrepancy arises from interrelated challenges related to the strength of mitigation commitments, data accuracy, regulatory scope, and technological readiness. A review of CH4 emissions inventories from 160 participants reveals that 77% lacked a 2020 baseline inventory, and the credibility of official data in several developed countries has also come under scrutiny. Most participants—including the European Union and the United States—have emphasized exploratory frameworks and policy rather than adopting concrete, quantitative reduction targets. Overall, CH4 mitigation efforts remain in an early development phase. Their future effectiveness will hinge on progress in four key areas: stronger mitigation commitments, enhanced data transparency, more comprehensive regulatory structures, and the deployment of innovative technologies. These findings underscore the urgent need for both participants and non-participants to strengthen international cooperation and activate untapped mitigation potential. Elevating CH4 reduction to a prominent position on the COP30 agenda and establishing a more binding framework for action will be crucial in the years ahead.
期刊介绍:
Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques.
Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.