{"title":"Oral care interventions for the prevention and management of anticancer therapy–induced oral mucositis: A systematic review","authors":"Zahra Farivar , Hamid Salehiniya , Leili Alizadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2025.100759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating complication of cancer treatments, particularly chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, increases healthcare costs, and can interrupt or delay cancer therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various oral care interventions in the prevention and management of OM in patients undergoing anticancer treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies published between January 2000 and June 2025. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 2542 records screened, 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 16 studies evaluated professional oral health care (POHC), 16 assessed chlorhexidine rinses, 6 focused on patient education, 6 examined sodium bicarbonate rinses, and 4 studied saline rinses. POHC and patient education consistently demonstrated beneficial effects, with over 75 % of studies in these categories reporting significant reductions in OM incidence and severity. Chlorhexidine and saline rinses showed mixed or limited results: only 38 % of chlorhexidine studies and 25 % of saline studies reported a measurable benefit. Risk of bias was rated as low to moderate in most studies, with 14 studies rated as high quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights the effectiveness of structured oral care interventions particularly POHC and patient education in mitigating OM among cancer patients. These findings support the integration of evidence-based oral care protocols into routine oncology practice and emphasize the need for standardized clinical guidelines to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906025000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating complication of cancer treatments, particularly chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, increases healthcare costs, and can interrupt or delay cancer therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various oral care interventions in the prevention and management of OM in patients undergoing anticancer treatments.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies published between January 2000 and June 2025. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.
Results
Out of 2542 records screened, 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 16 studies evaluated professional oral health care (POHC), 16 assessed chlorhexidine rinses, 6 focused on patient education, 6 examined sodium bicarbonate rinses, and 4 studied saline rinses. POHC and patient education consistently demonstrated beneficial effects, with over 75 % of studies in these categories reporting significant reductions in OM incidence and severity. Chlorhexidine and saline rinses showed mixed or limited results: only 38 % of chlorhexidine studies and 25 % of saline studies reported a measurable benefit. Risk of bias was rated as low to moderate in most studies, with 14 studies rated as high quality.
Conclusion
This review highlights the effectiveness of structured oral care interventions particularly POHC and patient education in mitigating OM among cancer patients. These findings support the integration of evidence-based oral care protocols into routine oncology practice and emphasize the need for standardized clinical guidelines to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.
背景:口腔黏膜炎(OM)是一种常见的癌症治疗并发症,尤其是化疗和放疗。它会显著影响患者的生活质量,增加医疗保健费用,并可能中断或延迟癌症治疗。本系统综述旨在评估各种口腔护理干预措施在接受抗癌治疗的患者中预防和管理OM的有效性。方法按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中进行系统的文献检索。符合条件的研究包括2000年1月至2025年6月间发表的临床试验和队列研究。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)关键评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。结果在筛选的2542份记录中,有48项研究符合纳入标准。其中,16项研究评估了专业口腔卫生保健(POHC), 16项评估了氯己定冲洗,6项关注患者教育,6项研究了碳酸氢钠冲洗,4项研究了生理盐水冲洗。POHC和患者教育一直显示出有益的效果,在这些类别的研究中,超过75%的研究报告OM发病率和严重程度显著降低。洗必泰和生理盐水冲洗显示混合或有限的结果:只有38%的洗必泰研究和25%的生理盐水研究报告了可测量的益处。在大多数研究中,偏倚风险被评为低至中等,有14项研究被评为高质量。结论本综述强调了结构化口腔护理干预,特别是POHC和患者教育在减轻癌症患者OM方面的有效性。这些发现支持将循证口腔护理方案整合到常规肿瘤学实践中,并强调需要标准化的临床指南来提高患者的预后和生活质量。