Ultrasonographic determination of bifurcation site of the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel

Donald Spears Wilcox , Antonio Tom Howard , Mark S. Mennemeier , Jacqueline Rainey , Charlotte Yates , Melissa Allen , Kevin D. Phelan
{"title":"Ultrasonographic determination of bifurcation site of the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel","authors":"Donald Spears Wilcox ,&nbsp;Antonio Tom Howard ,&nbsp;Mark S. Mennemeier ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Rainey ,&nbsp;Charlotte Yates ,&nbsp;Melissa Allen ,&nbsp;Kevin D. Phelan","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2025.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Variability of Tibial nerve branching patterns with regard to the tarsal tunnel and malleolar-calcaneal axis has been established in a limited number of cadaveric studies with relatively few subjects. The current study used high-resolution ultrasonography to investigate tibial nerve branching variability, in-vivo, from a large number of healthy subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>High resolution ultrasonography was used to map the course of the tibial nerve, to determine the bifurcation point into to medial and lateral plantar nerves with regard to the malleolar-calcaneal axis and the tarsal tunnel, and to classify them into one of five established branching patterns. The in-vivo, ultrasonography findings were then compared with findings from cadaveric studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ultrasonography data for 156 feet (78 subjects-40 male, 38 female) of young, healthy individuals produced results similar to the cadaveric data with only small differences in each branching classification. Additionally, variation in the type of branching patterns between the left and right legs was observed in 23 % of the sample (i.e., 18 of 78 subjects).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In-vivo, high-resolution ultrasound appears to be a valid approach for investigating anatomic variation of superficial nerves as the US data converge with those for cadaveric dissection. Further, not only were the percentages of branching pattern types replicated from earlier cadaveric studies, but also differences in the types of branching patterns between the left and right legs of the same subjects were observed in 23 % of the sample. A side-to-side difference of this type has not been previously reported. Finally, a decided advantage of using ultrasound to map nerve branching, when possible, is that it is easier to obtain a larger sample than in typical cadaveric studies. The current study more than doubled the number of specimens collected in previous cadaveric studies which greatly improves the external validity of our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668325000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Variability of Tibial nerve branching patterns with regard to the tarsal tunnel and malleolar-calcaneal axis has been established in a limited number of cadaveric studies with relatively few subjects. The current study used high-resolution ultrasonography to investigate tibial nerve branching variability, in-vivo, from a large number of healthy subjects.

Methods

High resolution ultrasonography was used to map the course of the tibial nerve, to determine the bifurcation point into to medial and lateral plantar nerves with regard to the malleolar-calcaneal axis and the tarsal tunnel, and to classify them into one of five established branching patterns. The in-vivo, ultrasonography findings were then compared with findings from cadaveric studies.

Results

The ultrasonography data for 156 feet (78 subjects-40 male, 38 female) of young, healthy individuals produced results similar to the cadaveric data with only small differences in each branching classification. Additionally, variation in the type of branching patterns between the left and right legs was observed in 23 % of the sample (i.e., 18 of 78 subjects).

Conclusions

In-vivo, high-resolution ultrasound appears to be a valid approach for investigating anatomic variation of superficial nerves as the US data converge with those for cadaveric dissection. Further, not only were the percentages of branching pattern types replicated from earlier cadaveric studies, but also differences in the types of branching patterns between the left and right legs of the same subjects were observed in 23 % of the sample. A side-to-side difference of this type has not been previously reported. Finally, a decided advantage of using ultrasound to map nerve branching, when possible, is that it is easier to obtain a larger sample than in typical cadaveric studies. The current study more than doubled the number of specimens collected in previous cadaveric studies which greatly improves the external validity of our findings.
胫神经在跗骨隧道分叉部位的超声检查
目的在相对较少的尸体研究中,已经建立了关于跗骨隧道和踝跟轴的胫骨神经分支模式的变异性。本研究使用高分辨率超声检查大量健康受试者体内胫骨神经分支变异性。方法采用高分辨率超声图像绘制胫神经的走行图,确定与踝-跟骨轴和跗骨隧道有关的内侧和外侧足底神经分叉点,并将其划分为五种已建立的分支模式之一。然后将体内超声检查结果与尸体研究结果进行比较。结果156英尺(78名受试者,男性40名,女性38名)年轻健康个体的超声数据与尸体数据相似,仅在每个分支分类上存在微小差异。此外,23%的样本(即78名受试者中的18名)观察到左腿和右腿之间分支模式类型的变化。结论在体内,高分辨率超声似乎是研究浅表神经解剖变异的有效方法,因为超声数据与尸体解剖数据趋于一致。此外,不仅分支模式类型的百分比与早期的尸体研究相同,而且在23%的样本中观察到同一受试者的左腿和右腿之间分支模式类型的差异。这种类型的侧对侧差异以前没有报道过。最后,在可能的情况下,使用超声波绘制神经分支图的一个决定性优势是,它比典型的尸体研究更容易获得更大的样本。目前的研究比以前的尸体研究收集的标本数量增加了一倍以上,这大大提高了我们研究结果的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信