A comparative study and validation of super-twisting sliding mode control for PMSG-based wind power systems

IF 5.4 2区计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS

Control Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106488

Zhongfeng Li , Jian Cai , Lidong Wang , Xiaoping Liu , Lixian Wang , Lei Liu , Dong Li

{"title":"A comparative study and validation of super-twisting sliding mode control for PMSG-based wind power systems","authors":"Zhongfeng Li , Jian Cai , Lidong Wang , Xiaoping Liu , Lixian Wang , Lei Liu , Dong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the stability and performance of wind energy conversion systems (WECS) based on Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators (PMSGs) under varying wind conditions. A comparative study of four control strategies—Field-Oriented Control (FOC), Nonlinear Backstepping Control (NBC), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), and the proposed Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control (STSMC)—is presented, supported by theoretical modeling and Lyapunov-based stability analysis. Simulation results for a 1-MW PMSG-based wind turbine indicate that STSMC reduces torque and speed overshoots by up to 50% compared to NBC and SMC, while also shortening settling times by 40%. The proposed approach effectively mitigates chattering, thereby lowering mechanical stress on drivetrain components. Validation through small-scale laboratory experiments and deployment at the 184-MW Huaneng Yingkou Gaokan Wind Power Project further demonstrates its robustness. The STSMC achieves precise current regulation, limits DC-link voltage deviations to within 0.5%, and maintains a Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of 1.3%, meeting IEEE grid standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106488"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125002503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the stability and performance of wind energy conversion systems (WECS) based on Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators (PMSGs) under varying wind conditions. A comparative study of four control strategies—Field-Oriented Control (FOC), Nonlinear Backstepping Control (NBC), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), and the proposed Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control (STSMC)—is presented, supported by theoretical modeling and Lyapunov-based stability analysis. Simulation results for a 1-MW PMSG-based wind turbine indicate that STSMC reduces torque and speed overshoots by up to 50% compared to NBC and SMC, while also shortening settling times by 40%. The proposed approach effectively mitigates chattering, thereby lowering mechanical stress on drivetrain components. Validation through small-scale laboratory experiments and deployment at the 184-MW Huaneng Yingkou Gaokan Wind Power Project further demonstrates its robustness. The STSMC achieves precise current regulation, limits DC-link voltage deviations to within 0.5%, and maintains a Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of 1.3%, meeting IEEE grid standards.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于pmsg的风电系统超扭滑模控制的对比研究与验证

本文研究了基于永磁同步发电机的风能转换系统在不同风况下的稳定性和性能。在理论建模和基于lyapunov的稳定性分析的支持下，对四种控制策略——场定向控制（FOC）、非线性反演控制（NBC）、滑模控制（SMC）和超扭转滑模控制（STSMC）进行了比较研究。1兆瓦pmsg风力涡轮机的仿真结果表明，与NBC和SMC相比，STSMC减少了高达50%的扭矩和速度超调，同时还缩短了40%的稳定时间。所提出的方法有效地减轻了抖振，从而降低了传动系统部件的机械应力。通过小规模实验室试验和184兆瓦华能营口高坎风电项目的部署验证，进一步证明了其稳健性。STSMC实现了精确的电流调节，将直流链路电压偏差限制在0.5%以内，并保持1.3%的总谐波失真（THD），符合IEEE电网标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程：电子与电气

CiteScore

9.20

自引率

12.20%

发文量

183

审稿时长

44 days

期刊介绍： Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.