Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients in Africa: A systematic review

IF 3.3 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Abdulgafar O. Jimoh , Shuaibu A. Hudu , Usman M. Aliyu , Adamu A Adamu , Nura Bello , Albashir Tahir , Nura Abubakar
{"title":"Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients in Africa: A systematic review","authors":"Abdulgafar O. Jimoh ,&nbsp;Shuaibu A. Hudu ,&nbsp;Usman M. Aliyu ,&nbsp;Adamu A Adamu ,&nbsp;Nura Bello ,&nbsp;Albashir Tahir ,&nbsp;Nura Abubakar","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is widely practiced by cancer patients globally, and in Africa, where the influence of cultural beliefs, limited access to healthcare, and personal preferences enhance its use. This systematic review explored the prevalent of CAM use, the various types of CAM practiced, and the reasons behind its use among cancer patients in Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, AJOL, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched to retrieve relevant studies using selected keywords and synonyms. Studies focusing on CAM usage patterns among cancer patients in Africa and published in English were considered. Relevant data were extracted, and the quality of the studies was evaluated using the CASP critical appraisal tool. Findings were narratively synthesized and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 studies from 12 African countries, involving 8,945 cancer patients, were included. The prevalence of CAM use was reported to range from 36% to 80%, indicating widespread reliance on these practices in Africa. The use of herbal medicine, spiritual healing, and dietary supplements were identified as the most common CAM modalities. CAM use was found to be more frequent among women, rural residents, and patients in advanced stages of cancer. Reasons for CAM use were reported to include cultural beliefs, limited trust in conventional treatments, and the hope of improved health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>CAM is widely practised among African cancer patients, driven by various cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors, offering emotional and psychological benefits. However, its unregulated use could potentially result in delays in receiving proper cancer treatment. Governments, healthcare providers, and researchers should work together to ensure that CAM practices are safe, evidence-based, and integrated into healthcare systems where appropriate. Public education on CAM use is also crucial to improve cancer care outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article e02852"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625003217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is widely practiced by cancer patients globally, and in Africa, where the influence of cultural beliefs, limited access to healthcare, and personal preferences enhance its use. This systematic review explored the prevalent of CAM use, the various types of CAM practiced, and the reasons behind its use among cancer patients in Africa.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, AJOL, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched to retrieve relevant studies using selected keywords and synonyms. Studies focusing on CAM usage patterns among cancer patients in Africa and published in English were considered. Relevant data were extracted, and the quality of the studies was evaluated using the CASP critical appraisal tool. Findings were narratively synthesized and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of 21 studies from 12 African countries, involving 8,945 cancer patients, were included. The prevalence of CAM use was reported to range from 36% to 80%, indicating widespread reliance on these practices in Africa. The use of herbal medicine, spiritual healing, and dietary supplements were identified as the most common CAM modalities. CAM use was found to be more frequent among women, rural residents, and patients in advanced stages of cancer. Reasons for CAM use were reported to include cultural beliefs, limited trust in conventional treatments, and the hope of improved health outcomes.

Discussion

CAM is widely practised among African cancer patients, driven by various cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors, offering emotional and psychological benefits. However, its unregulated use could potentially result in delays in receiving proper cancer treatment. Governments, healthcare providers, and researchers should work together to ensure that CAM practices are safe, evidence-based, and integrated into healthcare systems where appropriate. Public education on CAM use is also crucial to improve cancer care outcomes.
探索在非洲癌症患者中使用补充和替代药物:一项系统综述
补充和替代医学(CAM)在全球和非洲的癌症患者中得到广泛应用,在非洲,文化信仰的影响、有限的医疗保健机会和个人偏好增强了其使用。本系统综述探讨了非洲癌症患者普遍使用辅助治疗、各种类型的辅助治疗以及其使用背后的原因。方法对PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、AJOL、谷歌Scholar等数据库进行综合检索,选取关键词和同义词检索相关研究。审议了以非洲癌症患者为重点并以英文发表的CAM使用模式的研究。提取相关数据,并使用CASP关键评价工具对研究质量进行评价。根据PRISMA指南对结果进行叙述性综合和报告。结果共纳入了来自12个非洲国家的21项研究,涉及8945名癌症患者。据报告,辅助治疗的使用率在36%至80%之间,表明非洲普遍依赖这些做法。使用草药,精神治疗和膳食补充剂被确定为最常见的CAM模式。在妇女、农村居民和晚期癌症患者中,CAM的使用更为频繁。据报道,使用辅助医学的原因包括文化信仰、对常规治疗的有限信任以及对改善健康结果的希望。在各种文化、经济和卫生保健相关因素的推动下,cam在非洲癌症患者中广泛应用,提供情感和心理上的益处。然而,不受管制的使用可能会导致接受适当癌症治疗的延误。政府、卫生保健提供者和研究人员应共同努力,确保辅助治疗实践是安全的、以证据为基础的,并在适当情况下纳入卫生保健系统。对公众进行辅助治疗教育对于改善癌症治疗结果也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信