Beyond the bids: Lessons from farmers' reflections on Vickrey auctions of sweetpotato vines in Rwanda

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fleur B.M. Kilwinger , David J. Spielman , Conny J.M. Almekinders , Srinivasulu Rajendran , Ynte K. van Dam
{"title":"Beyond the bids: Lessons from farmers' reflections on Vickrey auctions of sweetpotato vines in Rwanda","authors":"Fleur B.M. Kilwinger ,&nbsp;David J. Spielman ,&nbsp;Conny J.M. Almekinders ,&nbsp;Srinivasulu Rajendran ,&nbsp;Ynte K. van Dam","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The use of high-quality seed can significantly enhance nutrition, food security, poverty alleviation, and climate change adaptation in rural farming communities. Economic valuation methods can be used to assess farmers' demand for such seed. However, the reproductive biology of seed and the social and economic institutions surrounding their production and exchange vary widely across crops and regions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>It is important to understand how such contextual factors relate to the assumptions that underly economic valuation methods. In this paper, we qualitatively evaluated an experimental Vickery auction conducted in Rwanda which aimed to identify farmers demand for disease-free vines of orange-fleshed sweet potato rich in Vitamin A.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Data were gathered through observations of and in-depth interviews with participating farmers, focusing on their experiences, strategies, and motivations during the auction. We examined farmers' reflections on the experimental auctions—rather than the auction results themselves—to understand context-specificity and methodological replicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><div>Our findings reveal that farmers assigned value to the vines in diverse ways, shaped by personal experience, social norms, and local exchange practices—often diverging from the assumptions of auction theory. These dynamics raise concerns about the validity and reliability of the auction outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Although auctions are an increasingly popular tool to evaluate the value of seeds and traits in smallholder farming systems, and although considerable effort has been put into examining mechanisms leading to product overestimation and underestimation in auction settings, this study offers a novel qualitative perspective that uncovers several reasons that explain deviations in the context of an experimental Vickrey auction for sweetpotato vines in rural Rwanda. Our findings highlight the challenges of using auction-based methods in capturing demand when used to value goods that are reproductive, socially embedded, and exchanged outside formal markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104448"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2500188X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The use of high-quality seed can significantly enhance nutrition, food security, poverty alleviation, and climate change adaptation in rural farming communities. Economic valuation methods can be used to assess farmers' demand for such seed. However, the reproductive biology of seed and the social and economic institutions surrounding their production and exchange vary widely across crops and regions.

Objective

It is important to understand how such contextual factors relate to the assumptions that underly economic valuation methods. In this paper, we qualitatively evaluated an experimental Vickery auction conducted in Rwanda which aimed to identify farmers demand for disease-free vines of orange-fleshed sweet potato rich in Vitamin A.

Method

Data were gathered through observations of and in-depth interviews with participating farmers, focusing on their experiences, strategies, and motivations during the auction. We examined farmers' reflections on the experimental auctions—rather than the auction results themselves—to understand context-specificity and methodological replicability.

Results and conclusion

Our findings reveal that farmers assigned value to the vines in diverse ways, shaped by personal experience, social norms, and local exchange practices—often diverging from the assumptions of auction theory. These dynamics raise concerns about the validity and reliability of the auction outcomes.

Significance

Although auctions are an increasingly popular tool to evaluate the value of seeds and traits in smallholder farming systems, and although considerable effort has been put into examining mechanisms leading to product overestimation and underestimation in auction settings, this study offers a novel qualitative perspective that uncovers several reasons that explain deviations in the context of an experimental Vickrey auction for sweetpotato vines in rural Rwanda. Our findings highlight the challenges of using auction-based methods in capturing demand when used to value goods that are reproductive, socially embedded, and exchanged outside formal markets.

Abstract Image

在竞标之外:来自卢旺达农民对维克里(Vickrey)甘薯藤拍卖的反思
使用优质种子可以显著改善农村农业社区的营养、粮食安全、扶贫和气候变化适应。经济评估方法可以用来评估农民对这类种子的需求。然而,种子的生殖生物学以及围绕种子生产和交换的社会和经济制度在不同作物和地区差别很大。目的了解这些背景因素与经济估值方法的假设之间的关系是很重要的。在本文中,我们定性地评估了在卢旺达进行的一项实验性维克里拍卖,该拍卖旨在确定农民对富含维生素a的橙肉甘薯无病葡萄藤的需求。方法通过对参与拍卖的农民的观察和深度访谈收集数据,重点关注他们在拍卖期间的经验、策略和动机。我们考察了农民对实验性拍卖的看法,而不是拍卖结果本身,以了解环境的特殊性和方法的可复制性。结果和结论:我们的研究结果表明,农民以不同的方式为葡萄藤分配价值,这些方式受个人经验、社会规范和当地交换实践的影响,通常与拍卖理论的假设不同。这些动态引发了对拍卖结果有效性和可靠性的担忧。尽管拍卖是小农农业系统中评估种子和性状价值的一种日益流行的工具,尽管已经投入了相当大的努力来检查导致拍卖环境中产品高估和低估的机制,但本研究提供了一个新的定性视角,揭示了在卢旺达农村甘薯藤蔓的实验性Vickrey拍卖背景下解释偏差的几个原因。我们的研究结果突出表明,当用于评估具有再生性、社会嵌入性和在正规市场之外交换的商品时,使用基于拍卖的方法捕捉需求存在挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信