Cost and viability estimation of shared mobility services

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Raphael Abt, Konstantin Krauss
{"title":"Cost and viability estimation of shared mobility services","authors":"Raphael Abt,&nbsp;Konstantin Krauss","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The regulation of novel shared mobility services including their meaningful integration into existing transport systems is widely discussed. While knowledge about the demand side is growing steadily, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the services' supply side, such as their true cost and revenue structures. Therefore, our work presents an extensive cost analysis that captures five different shared mobility operating types: free-floating and station-based car sharing, on-demand ride-pooling, hybrid bike sharing, and shared e-scooters. We aim to provide insights into the services' cost components their magnitudes and resulting viability. To achieve this, we first collect cost information based on an extensive literature review and guideline-based expert interviews. Second, cost components and their cost-generating activities are extracted for subsequent cost modelling. Finally, by adding empirical cost, revenue, and utilisation data, we model operating type-specific costs and viability. Our results indicate that the total costs per passenger kilometre are heavily dependent on the exact operating type. However, in relative terms operations-related costs and vehicle leasing account for more than 50 % of the total costs per passenger kilometre in all services. When comparing the relative shares of the operations-related costs, three different cost structures stand out. First, in both car sharing models, more than half of the operations-related costs originate from cleaning and parking activities. Second, in shared e-scooters and bike sharing, the expenses for field agents and mechanics dominate the operations-related costs. Third, in ride pooling, the operations-related costs are dominated by driver salaries. When estimating the viability almost all services indicate questionable profitability. Since we find a low share of variable costs to be present in all services, we conclude increased vehicle utilisation to be crucial for shared mobility's path to profitability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulation of novel shared mobility services including their meaningful integration into existing transport systems is widely discussed. While knowledge about the demand side is growing steadily, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the services' supply side, such as their true cost and revenue structures. Therefore, our work presents an extensive cost analysis that captures five different shared mobility operating types: free-floating and station-based car sharing, on-demand ride-pooling, hybrid bike sharing, and shared e-scooters. We aim to provide insights into the services' cost components their magnitudes and resulting viability. To achieve this, we first collect cost information based on an extensive literature review and guideline-based expert interviews. Second, cost components and their cost-generating activities are extracted for subsequent cost modelling. Finally, by adding empirical cost, revenue, and utilisation data, we model operating type-specific costs and viability. Our results indicate that the total costs per passenger kilometre are heavily dependent on the exact operating type. However, in relative terms operations-related costs and vehicle leasing account for more than 50 % of the total costs per passenger kilometre in all services. When comparing the relative shares of the operations-related costs, three different cost structures stand out. First, in both car sharing models, more than half of the operations-related costs originate from cleaning and parking activities. Second, in shared e-scooters and bike sharing, the expenses for field agents and mechanics dominate the operations-related costs. Third, in ride pooling, the operations-related costs are dominated by driver salaries. When estimating the viability almost all services indicate questionable profitability. Since we find a low share of variable costs to be present in all services, we conclude increased vehicle utilisation to be crucial for shared mobility's path to profitability.
共享出行服务的成本和可行性评估
对新型共享移动服务的监管,包括它们与现有交通系统的有意义的整合,被广泛讨论。虽然关于需求方面的知识正在稳步增长,但关于服务供给方面的知识却存在差距,比如它们的真实成本和收入结构。因此,我们的工作提供了一个广泛的成本分析,涵盖了五种不同的共享移动运营类型:自由浮动和基于站点的汽车共享、按需拼车、混合动力自行车共享和共享电动滑板车。我们的目标是深入了解服务的成本组成部分、规模和最终的可行性。为了实现这一目标,我们首先根据广泛的文献综述和基于指南的专家访谈收集成本信息。其次,提取成本组成部分及其产生成本的活动,用于后续的成本建模。最后,通过添加经验成本、收入和利用率数据,我们对特定类型的运营成本和可行性进行了建模。我们的研究结果表明,每乘客公里的总成本在很大程度上取决于确切的运营类型。然而,相对而言,运营相关成本和车辆租赁占所有服务中每乘客公里总成本的50%以上。在比较运营相关成本的相对份额时,有三种不同的成本结构突出。首先,在两种汽车共享模式中,超过一半的运营相关成本来自清洁和停车活动。其次,在共享电动滑板车和共享单车中,现场代理和机械师的费用在运营相关成本中占主导地位。第三,在拼车中,与运营相关的成本主要是司机的工资。在估计可行性时,几乎所有的服务都显示出可疑的盈利能力。由于我们发现所有服务的可变成本份额都很低,因此我们得出结论,提高车辆利用率对于共享出行的盈利之路至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信