Beyond the AI divide: A straightforward approach to identifying global and local overperformers in AI preparedness

IF 7.2
Digital Business Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100136
Pierre Mandon
{"title":"Beyond the AI divide: A straightforward approach to identifying global and local overperformers in AI preparedness","authors":"Pierre Mandon","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces a straightforward data-driven framework to identify countries that outperform in artificial intelligence (AI) preparedness relative to their economic complexity, utilizing the IMF's Artificial Intelligence Preparedness Index and a multidimensional Economic Complexity Index derived from trade and research data. Employing weighted least squares, the study estimates expected AIPI scores and classifies countries as global or local overperformers if their observed scores exceed predictions and surpass income-group medians. The analysis identifies 10 high-income global overperformers and 14 local overperformers across middle- and low-income groups, revealing regulation and ethics as universal drivers of overperformance, with digital infrastructure and human capital varying by economic context. Case studies elucidate diverse coordination models—state-led, market-responsive, and distributed innovation—while highlighting transferability constraints due to institutional and historical factors, among others. The replicable methodology provides policymakers and other key actors a robust tool to benchmark AI readiness and design context-specific strategies, addressing the global AI divide. The study opens avenues for future research into refined AI preparedness metrics, alternative identification techniques, and comparative analyses of national innovation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954425000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces a straightforward data-driven framework to identify countries that outperform in artificial intelligence (AI) preparedness relative to their economic complexity, utilizing the IMF's Artificial Intelligence Preparedness Index and a multidimensional Economic Complexity Index derived from trade and research data. Employing weighted least squares, the study estimates expected AIPI scores and classifies countries as global or local overperformers if their observed scores exceed predictions and surpass income-group medians. The analysis identifies 10 high-income global overperformers and 14 local overperformers across middle- and low-income groups, revealing regulation and ethics as universal drivers of overperformance, with digital infrastructure and human capital varying by economic context. Case studies elucidate diverse coordination models—state-led, market-responsive, and distributed innovation—while highlighting transferability constraints due to institutional and historical factors, among others. The replicable methodology provides policymakers and other key actors a robust tool to benchmark AI readiness and design context-specific strategies, addressing the global AI divide. The study opens avenues for future research into refined AI preparedness metrics, alternative identification techniques, and comparative analyses of national innovation systems.
超越人工智能鸿沟:一种确定全球和地方人工智能准备工作优秀者的直接方法
本研究引入了一个简单的数据驱动框架,利用国际货币基金组织的人工智能准备指数和基于贸易和研究数据的多维经济复杂性指数,确定在人工智能(AI)准备方面表现优于其经济复杂性的国家。该研究采用加权最小二乘法估计AIPI的预期分数,并将观察到的分数超过预测并超过收入群体中位数的国家分类为全球或当地优等者。该分析确定了10个高收入的全球优胜者和14个中低收入群体的本地优胜者,揭示了监管和道德是优胜者的普遍驱动因素,数字基础设施和人力资本因经济背景而异。案例研究阐明了多种协调模式——国家主导、市场响应和分布式创新——同时强调了制度和历史因素等造成的可转移性限制。可复制的方法为政策制定者和其他关键行为者提供了一个强大的工具,可以对人工智能准备情况进行基准测试,并设计针对具体情况的战略,从而解决全球人工智能鸿沟。该研究为未来研究完善的人工智能准备指标、替代识别技术和国家创新系统的比较分析开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书