Neurofilament, but not Alzheimer disease biomarkers in the acute phase correlate with cognitive performance after cardiac arrest

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Johannes Lorentzson , Gisela Lilja , Erik Blennow Nordström , Kaj Blennow , Henrik Zetterberg , Christian Hassager , Matt P. Wise , Andrea L. Benedet , Tommaso Pellis , Hans Friberg , Nicholas Ashton , Marion Moseby Knappe
{"title":"Neurofilament, but not Alzheimer disease biomarkers in the acute phase correlate with cognitive performance after cardiac arrest","authors":"Johannes Lorentzson ,&nbsp;Gisela Lilja ,&nbsp;Erik Blennow Nordström ,&nbsp;Kaj Blennow ,&nbsp;Henrik Zetterberg ,&nbsp;Christian Hassager ,&nbsp;Matt P. Wise ,&nbsp;Andrea L. Benedet ,&nbsp;Tommaso Pellis ,&nbsp;Hans Friberg ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ashton ,&nbsp;Marion Moseby Knappe","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biomarkers serve as a quantitative measure of brain injury and may predict cognitive outcome after cardiac arrest. This study investigates the association and predictive accuracy of acute changes in Alzheimer disease-associated biomarkers to cognitive outcome in cardiac arrest survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective study of the Target Temperature Management after Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest trial. Serum from adult cardiac arrest survivors was sampled prospectively at 24, 48, and 72 h post-arrest and analyzed for peak-levels of Alzheimer disease markers (p-tau<sup>181</sup>, total tau, amyloid β [Aβ40 and Aβ42]), and the neurodegenerative biomarker neurofilament light (NfL). Cognitive outcome was evaluated blinded from biomarker results using four performance-based assessments at 6 months post-arrest. Spearman correlations were calculated. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated for biomarkers discriminatory ability for binary results of cognitive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>206/342 (60 %) survivors from participating sites were included. Median was age 62 (IQR 53–69), 86 % male, 15 (7 %) had Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores &lt; 24. Alzheimer disease biomarkers exhibited at best small correlations to cognitive outcomes (rho = −0.22 to 0.18). The correlation between outcome instruments and NfL was rho = −0.32 to −0.20 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Discriminatory ability of cognitive impairment for acute changes in Alzheimer disease biomarkers was AUC 0.44–0.68 (95 % CI 0.29–0.82), and AUC 0.66–0.86 (95 % CI 0.59–0.95) for NfL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In contrast to tau- and amyloid-related biomarkers, NfL could be more useful for predicting cognitive function in cardiac arrest survivors. Low participation by survivors with severe brain injury may have influenced results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biomarkers serve as a quantitative measure of brain injury and may predict cognitive outcome after cardiac arrest. This study investigates the association and predictive accuracy of acute changes in Alzheimer disease-associated biomarkers to cognitive outcome in cardiac arrest survivors.

Methods

Retrospective study of the Target Temperature Management after Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest trial. Serum from adult cardiac arrest survivors was sampled prospectively at 24, 48, and 72 h post-arrest and analyzed for peak-levels of Alzheimer disease markers (p-tau181, total tau, amyloid β [Aβ40 and Aβ42]), and the neurodegenerative biomarker neurofilament light (NfL). Cognitive outcome was evaluated blinded from biomarker results using four performance-based assessments at 6 months post-arrest. Spearman correlations were calculated. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated for biomarkers discriminatory ability for binary results of cognitive performance.

Results

206/342 (60 %) survivors from participating sites were included. Median was age 62 (IQR 53–69), 86 % male, 15 (7 %) had Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores < 24. Alzheimer disease biomarkers exhibited at best small correlations to cognitive outcomes (rho = −0.22 to 0.18). The correlation between outcome instruments and NfL was rho = −0.32 to −0.20 (p < 0.01). Discriminatory ability of cognitive impairment for acute changes in Alzheimer disease biomarkers was AUC 0.44–0.68 (95 % CI 0.29–0.82), and AUC 0.66–0.86 (95 % CI 0.59–0.95) for NfL.

Conclusion

In contrast to tau- and amyloid-related biomarkers, NfL could be more useful for predicting cognitive function in cardiac arrest survivors. Low participation by survivors with severe brain injury may have influenced results.
神经丝,而不是阿尔茨海默病的生物标志物在急性期与心脏骤停后的认知表现相关
生物标志物作为脑损伤的定量测量,可以预测心脏骤停后的认知结果。本研究探讨了阿尔茨海默病相关生物标志物的急性变化与心脏骤停幸存者认知结果的相关性和预测准确性。方法回顾性研究院外心脏骤停试验后目标体温管理。在心脏骤停后24、48和72小时对成人心脏骤停幸存者的血清进行前瞻性采样,并分析阿尔茨海默病标志物(p-tau181、总tau、β淀粉样蛋白[Aβ40和Aβ42])和神经退行性生物标志物神经丝光(NfL)的峰值水平。在心脏骤停后6个月,通过四项基于表现的评估,盲法评估生物标志物结果的认知结果。计算Spearman相关性。计算受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(Area Under Receiver Operating characteristic curves, AUC),对认知表现的二元结果进行生物标志物的区分能力。结果342例幸存者中有206例(60%)入选。中位年龄为62岁(IQR 53-69), 86%为男性,15例(7%)有简易精神状态检查(MMSE)得分;24. 阿尔茨海默病生物标志物与认知结果最多显示出很小的相关性(rho = - 0.22至0.18)。预后工具与NfL的相关性为rho = - 0.32 ~ - 0.20 (p <;0.01)。认知障碍对阿尔茨海默病生物标志物急性变化的鉴别能力为AUC 0.44-0.68 (95% CI 0.29-0.82), NfL的AUC 0.66-0.86 (95% CI 0.59-0.95)。结论与tau蛋白和淀粉样蛋白相关的生物标志物相比,NfL在预测心脏骤停幸存者的认知功能方面更有用。严重脑损伤幸存者的低参与度可能影响了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信