Testing the load capacity curve for deforestation: A critical investigation using novel methods for the United States

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Umut Uzar , Kemal Eyuboglu
{"title":"Testing the load capacity curve for deforestation: A critical investigation using novel methods for the United States","authors":"Umut Uzar ,&nbsp;Kemal Eyuboglu","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding whether the relationship between economic activity and forest ecosystems entails a trade-off or synergy is crucial for sustainable development. Although the Environmental Kuznets Curve has been widely used to explore this dynamic, its reliance on demand-side indicators poses a notable limitation. In this regard, the Load Capacity Curve for Deforestation (LCCd) hypothesis provides a more comprehensive framework by simultaneously capturing the supply and demand aspects of environmental sustainability. Despite its conceptual relevance, empirical validation of the LCCd hypothesis remains highly limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the validity of LCCd for the United States from 1980 to 2022, employing a novel Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach. In addition, the analysis encompasses economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization. Results reveal a U-shaped relationship between economic growth and forest load capacity, confirming the LCCd hypothesis. While trade openness contributes positively to forest sustainability, financial development has a negative effect, and urbanization appears to be insignificant in the long run. Robustness checks support the main findings. Overall, this study provides pioneering empirical evidence in support of the LCCd hypothesis and underscores the importance of aligning financial development with environmental objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding whether the relationship between economic activity and forest ecosystems entails a trade-off or synergy is crucial for sustainable development. Although the Environmental Kuznets Curve has been widely used to explore this dynamic, its reliance on demand-side indicators poses a notable limitation. In this regard, the Load Capacity Curve for Deforestation (LCCd) hypothesis provides a more comprehensive framework by simultaneously capturing the supply and demand aspects of environmental sustainability. Despite its conceptual relevance, empirical validation of the LCCd hypothesis remains highly limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the validity of LCCd for the United States from 1980 to 2022, employing a novel Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach. In addition, the analysis encompasses economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization. Results reveal a U-shaped relationship between economic growth and forest load capacity, confirming the LCCd hypothesis. While trade openness contributes positively to forest sustainability, financial development has a negative effect, and urbanization appears to be insignificant in the long run. Robustness checks support the main findings. Overall, this study provides pioneering empirical evidence in support of the LCCd hypothesis and underscores the importance of aligning financial development with environmental objectives.
测试森林砍伐的负荷能力曲线:美国使用新方法的关键调查
了解经济活动与森林生态系统之间的关系是否需要取舍或协同作用,对可持续发展至关重要。尽管环境库兹涅茨曲线已被广泛用于探索这一动态,但它对需求侧指标的依赖存在明显的局限性。在这方面,毁林负荷能力曲线假说通过同时捕捉环境可持续性的供需方面,提供了一个更全面的框架。尽管其概念上的相关性,LCCd假说的实证验证仍然非常有限。本研究采用一种新颖的增强自回归分布滞后方法,通过检验1980年至2022年美国LCCd的有效性,解决了这一差距。此外,分析还包括经济增长、金融发展、贸易开放和城市化。结果表明,经济增长与森林负荷能力呈u型关系,证实了LCCd假说。虽然贸易开放对森林可持续性有积极作用,但金融发展有负面影响,从长远来看,城市化似乎微不足道。稳健性检查支持主要发现。总体而言,本研究为支持LCCd假说提供了开创性的经验证据,并强调了将金融发展与环境目标相结合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信