{"title":"Testing the load capacity curve for deforestation: A critical investigation using novel methods for the United States","authors":"Umut Uzar , Kemal Eyuboglu","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding whether the relationship between economic activity and forest ecosystems entails a trade-off or synergy is crucial for sustainable development. Although the Environmental Kuznets Curve has been widely used to explore this dynamic, its reliance on demand-side indicators poses a notable limitation. In this regard, the Load Capacity Curve for Deforestation (LCCd) hypothesis provides a more comprehensive framework by simultaneously capturing the supply and demand aspects of environmental sustainability. Despite its conceptual relevance, empirical validation of the LCCd hypothesis remains highly limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the validity of LCCd for the United States from 1980 to 2022, employing a novel Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach. In addition, the analysis encompasses economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization. Results reveal a U-shaped relationship between economic growth and forest load capacity, confirming the LCCd hypothesis. While trade openness contributes positively to forest sustainability, financial development has a negative effect, and urbanization appears to be insignificant in the long run. Robustness checks support the main findings. Overall, this study provides pioneering empirical evidence in support of the LCCd hypothesis and underscores the importance of aligning financial development with environmental objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding whether the relationship between economic activity and forest ecosystems entails a trade-off or synergy is crucial for sustainable development. Although the Environmental Kuznets Curve has been widely used to explore this dynamic, its reliance on demand-side indicators poses a notable limitation. In this regard, the Load Capacity Curve for Deforestation (LCCd) hypothesis provides a more comprehensive framework by simultaneously capturing the supply and demand aspects of environmental sustainability. Despite its conceptual relevance, empirical validation of the LCCd hypothesis remains highly limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the validity of LCCd for the United States from 1980 to 2022, employing a novel Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach. In addition, the analysis encompasses economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization. Results reveal a U-shaped relationship between economic growth and forest load capacity, confirming the LCCd hypothesis. While trade openness contributes positively to forest sustainability, financial development has a negative effect, and urbanization appears to be insignificant in the long run. Robustness checks support the main findings. Overall, this study provides pioneering empirical evidence in support of the LCCd hypothesis and underscores the importance of aligning financial development with environmental objectives.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.