Gözde Yağcı , Gülnihal Metin , Sibel Yerli , Ali İmran Yalçın , Songül Aksoy , Semra Topuz , Fatih Erbahçeci
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a novel device to evaluate balance and postural control − Quadrotics Poise Q10","authors":"Gözde Yağcı , Gülnihal Metin , Sibel Yerli , Ali İmran Yalçın , Songül Aksoy , Semra Topuz , Fatih Erbahçeci","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment of balance using force platform-based methods are crucial for diagnosis and treatment in the fields of physiotherapy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Quadrotics Poise Q10 in measuring postural sway and limits of stability, using simultaneous assessments with the Bertec force platform in 40 healthy participants. Postural sway was evaluated under four conditions. Limits of stability were analysed in the four directions. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the concurrent and absolute validity of the Quadrotics Poise Q10. Intra and Inter-Rater reliability were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement, and Minimum Detectable Change. Additionally Limits of Agreement and Bland–Altman plots were conducted. A strong relationship was observed in anteroposterior and mediolateral sway on both hard and soft surfaces, with eyes open and closed (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found for all directions excursions during the limits of stability test (p < 0.05). Intra-rater reliability analysis demonstrated high reliability for postural sway (ICC:0.60–0.87) and excellent reliability for LoS (ICC:0.91–0.95). Inter-rater reliability was found to be high across all test conditions, with ICC values ranging from 0.67 to 0.83 for postural sway and excellent reliability for LoS in the right and left directions (ICC = 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) and high in the forward and backward direcions (ICC = 0.67–0.71). The study’s findings indicate that the newly developed device is valid and reliable for evaluating limits of stability and postural sway. However, Bland–Altman analysis variations highlighted in lower agreement under more challenging test conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025003835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessment of balance using force platform-based methods are crucial for diagnosis and treatment in the fields of physiotherapy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Quadrotics Poise Q10 in measuring postural sway and limits of stability, using simultaneous assessments with the Bertec force platform in 40 healthy participants. Postural sway was evaluated under four conditions. Limits of stability were analysed in the four directions. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the concurrent and absolute validity of the Quadrotics Poise Q10. Intra and Inter-Rater reliability were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement, and Minimum Detectable Change. Additionally Limits of Agreement and Bland–Altman plots were conducted. A strong relationship was observed in anteroposterior and mediolateral sway on both hard and soft surfaces, with eyes open and closed (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found for all directions excursions during the limits of stability test (p < 0.05). Intra-rater reliability analysis demonstrated high reliability for postural sway (ICC:0.60–0.87) and excellent reliability for LoS (ICC:0.91–0.95). Inter-rater reliability was found to be high across all test conditions, with ICC values ranging from 0.67 to 0.83 for postural sway and excellent reliability for LoS in the right and left directions (ICC = 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) and high in the forward and backward direcions (ICC = 0.67–0.71). The study’s findings indicate that the newly developed device is valid and reliable for evaluating limits of stability and postural sway. However, Bland–Altman analysis variations highlighted in lower agreement under more challenging test conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.