Validity and reliability of a novel device to evaluate balance and postural control − Quadrotics Poise Q10

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Gözde Yağcı , Gülnihal Metin , Sibel Yerli , Ali İmran Yalçın , Songül Aksoy , Semra Topuz , Fatih Erbahçeci
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a novel device to evaluate balance and postural control − Quadrotics Poise Q10","authors":"Gözde Yağcı ,&nbsp;Gülnihal Metin ,&nbsp;Sibel Yerli ,&nbsp;Ali İmran Yalçın ,&nbsp;Songül Aksoy ,&nbsp;Semra Topuz ,&nbsp;Fatih Erbahçeci","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment of balance using force platform-based methods are crucial for diagnosis and treatment in the fields of physiotherapy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Quadrotics Poise Q10 in measuring postural sway and limits of stability, using simultaneous assessments with the Bertec force platform in 40 healthy participants. Postural sway was evaluated under four conditions. Limits of stability were analysed in the four directions. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the concurrent and absolute validity of the Quadrotics Poise Q10. Intra and Inter-Rater reliability were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement, and Minimum Detectable Change. Additionally Limits of Agreement and Bland–Altman plots were conducted. A strong relationship was observed in anteroposterior and mediolateral sway on both hard and soft surfaces, with eyes open and closed (p &lt; 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found for all directions excursions during the limits of stability test (p &lt; 0.05). Intra-rater reliability analysis demonstrated high reliability for postural sway (ICC:0.60–0.87) and excellent reliability for LoS (ICC:0.91–0.95). Inter-rater reliability was found to be high across all test conditions, with ICC values ranging from 0.67 to 0.83 for postural sway and excellent reliability for LoS in the right and left directions (ICC = 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) and high in the forward and backward direcions (ICC = 0.67–0.71). The study’s findings indicate that the newly developed device is valid and reliable for evaluating limits of stability and postural sway. However, Bland–Altman analysis variations highlighted in lower agreement under more challenging test conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025003835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of balance using force platform-based methods are crucial for diagnosis and treatment in the fields of physiotherapy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Quadrotics Poise Q10 in measuring postural sway and limits of stability, using simultaneous assessments with the Bertec force platform in 40 healthy participants. Postural sway was evaluated under four conditions. Limits of stability were analysed in the four directions. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the concurrent and absolute validity of the Quadrotics Poise Q10. Intra and Inter-Rater reliability were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement, and Minimum Detectable Change. Additionally Limits of Agreement and Bland–Altman plots were conducted. A strong relationship was observed in anteroposterior and mediolateral sway on both hard and soft surfaces, with eyes open and closed (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found for all directions excursions during the limits of stability test (p < 0.05). Intra-rater reliability analysis demonstrated high reliability for postural sway (ICC:0.60–0.87) and excellent reliability for LoS (ICC:0.91–0.95). Inter-rater reliability was found to be high across all test conditions, with ICC values ranging from 0.67 to 0.83 for postural sway and excellent reliability for LoS in the right and left directions (ICC = 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) and high in the forward and backward direcions (ICC = 0.67–0.71). The study’s findings indicate that the newly developed device is valid and reliable for evaluating limits of stability and postural sway. However, Bland–Altman analysis variations highlighted in lower agreement under more challenging test conditions.
一种评估平衡和姿势控制的新设备的有效性和可靠性- Quadrotics Poise Q10
使用基于力平台的方法评估平衡在物理治疗领域的诊断和治疗中至关重要。本研究评估了Quadrotics Poise Q10在测量体位摇摆和稳定性极限方面的有效性和可靠性,同时评估了40名健康参与者的Bertec力平台。在四种情况下评估体位摇摆。分析了四个方向的稳定性极限。采用Pearson相关分析评估Quadrotics Poise Q10的并发效度和绝对效度。采用类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化来检验组内和组间信度。此外,还进行了协议限和Bland-Altman图。在硬表面和软表面的前后和中外侧摇摆中观察到强烈的关系,眼睛睁开和闭上(p <;0.05)。在稳定性测试的极限期间,所有方向的偏移都存在中等到强的相关性(p <;0.05)。内部信度分析表明,姿态摇摆的高信度(ICC: 0.60-0.87)和LoS的高信度(ICC: 0.91-0.95)。在所有测试条件下,评估间信度都很高,体位摇摆的ICC值在0.67至0.83之间,左右方向的LoS信度非常好(ICC分别为0.93和0.91),向前和向后方向的LoS信度很高(ICC = 0.67 - 0.71)。研究结果表明,新开发的装置是有效和可靠的评估稳定性和姿态摇摆的极限。然而,在更具挑战性的测试条件下,Bland-Altman分析差异强调了较低的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信