Bridging theory and practice: Enhancing pharmacology education through simulation-based learning and statistical analysis training

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Mohammed F. Salahuddin
{"title":"Bridging theory and practice: Enhancing pharmacology education through simulation-based learning and statistical analysis training","authors":"Mohammed F. Salahuddin","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of simulation-based education (SBE) combined with statistical analysis training on student pharmacists learning, engagement, and competency development in areas such as hypothesis testing, data analysis, and pharmacological understanding.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining pre- and post-surveys, thematic analysis of student pharmacists' reflections, and capstone presentations in the Simulation-Based Experimental Pharmacology course across two semesters (Spring and Fall 2024). Participants included five students in Spring and fifteen in Fall, all enrolled in a Doctor of Pharmacy program. Surveys assessed interest, confidence, and pharmacological understanding, while qualitative reflections explored critical thinking, research skills, and real-world application of pharmacological principles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey results indicated marked improvements in students' <em>pharmacological knowledge</em>, <em>confidence using simulation tools</em>, and <em>ability to identify pharmacological agents</em>. Students also reported increased comfort with interpreting and analyzing pharmacological data. Qualitative reflections reinforced these findings, revealing enhanced skills in hypothesis formulation, data interpretation, and linking theory to practice. Dominant themes included real-world application of pharmacology, growth in scientific communication, and resilience in research.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Integrating SBE with statistical tools enhances student pharmacists' engagement, critical thinking, and confidence, particularly in drug identification and data analysis. This approach addresses limitations of traditional pharmacology education by offering ethical, interactive, and competency-driven learning experiences. Future research should explore long-term impacts on professional performance and clinical decision-making. This model may offer a competency-based alternative to traditional pharmacology education and warrants further evaluation of long-term impacts on clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 11","pages":"Article 102440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725001613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of simulation-based education (SBE) combined with statistical analysis training on student pharmacists learning, engagement, and competency development in areas such as hypothesis testing, data analysis, and pharmacological understanding.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining pre- and post-surveys, thematic analysis of student pharmacists' reflections, and capstone presentations in the Simulation-Based Experimental Pharmacology course across two semesters (Spring and Fall 2024). Participants included five students in Spring and fifteen in Fall, all enrolled in a Doctor of Pharmacy program. Surveys assessed interest, confidence, and pharmacological understanding, while qualitative reflections explored critical thinking, research skills, and real-world application of pharmacological principles.

Results

Survey results indicated marked improvements in students' pharmacological knowledge, confidence using simulation tools, and ability to identify pharmacological agents. Students also reported increased comfort with interpreting and analyzing pharmacological data. Qualitative reflections reinforced these findings, revealing enhanced skills in hypothesis formulation, data interpretation, and linking theory to practice. Dominant themes included real-world application of pharmacology, growth in scientific communication, and resilience in research.

Conclusion

Integrating SBE with statistical tools enhances student pharmacists' engagement, critical thinking, and confidence, particularly in drug identification and data analysis. This approach addresses limitations of traditional pharmacology education by offering ethical, interactive, and competency-driven learning experiences. Future research should explore long-term impacts on professional performance and clinical decision-making. This model may offer a competency-based alternative to traditional pharmacology education and warrants further evaluation of long-term impacts on clinical decision-making.

Abstract Image

衔接理论与实践:通过模拟学习和统计分析训练加强药理学教育
目的探讨模拟教育与统计分析相结合对药师学生学习、参与和能力发展的影响,包括假设检验、数据分析和药理学理解。方法采用混合方法,结合前后调查,学生药师反思的专题分析,以及两个学期(2024年春季和秋季)基于模拟的实验药理学课程的顶点报告。参与者包括5名春季学生和15名秋季学生,他们都参加了药学博士课程。调查评估兴趣、信心和药理学理解,而定性反思探索批判性思维、研究技能和药理学原理的实际应用。结果调查结果显示,学生的药理学知识、使用模拟工具的信心以及识别药理学药物的能力都有显著提高。学生们还报告说,他们在解释和分析药理学数据时更加自如。定性反思强化了这些发现,揭示了在假设制定、数据解释和理论与实践联系方面提高的技能。主要主题包括药理学在现实世界中的应用、科学交流的增长和研究的弹性。结论将SBE与统计工具相结合可以提高学生的参与度、批判性思维和自信心,尤其是在药物鉴定和数据分析方面。这种方法通过提供道德、互动和能力驱动的学习经验来解决传统药理学教育的局限性。未来的研究应探讨对专业表现和临床决策的长期影响。这种模式可以为传统药理学教育提供一种基于能力的替代方案,并保证对临床决策的长期影响进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信