Opinions of pharmacy educators regarding declining North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) first-time pass rates

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hope Brandon , Jennifer A. Scarduzio , Laurie Fogleman , Sara Stallworth , Clark Kebodeaux , Frank Romanelli
{"title":"Opinions of pharmacy educators regarding declining North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) first-time pass rates","authors":"Hope Brandon ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Scarduzio ,&nbsp;Laurie Fogleman ,&nbsp;Sara Stallworth ,&nbsp;Clark Kebodeaux ,&nbsp;Frank Romanelli","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Identify factors perceived by pharmacy educators to be associated with declining North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) first-time pass rates to highlight potential focused areas of further research or consideration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative responses from a single open-ended question, “What other factors not addressed in this survey do you believe are influencing the decline in NAPLEX first-time pass rates?”, were analyzed using thematic analysis. This question was part of a 43-item Qualtrics™ questionnaire developed to gather insight from pharmacy educators regarding the impact of various factors on the declining NAPLEX first-time pass rates. Due to the large number of responses, qualitative data was analyzed separately from quantitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two hundred and seventy-one qualitative responses were recorded. The analysis revealed five second-level, or higher-order categories, and sixteen first-level, descriptive codes which were used for analysis. The categories included external factors, student factors, faculty characteristics, pharmacy program challenges, and NAPLEX challenges. The first level codes included a variety of themes such as financial insecurity, increased student diversity, faculty accountability, and accreditation pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pharmacy educators perceive that many factors could be influencing declining first-time NAPLEX pass rates. Based on the data included in this manuscript, items to consider include providing additional financial support to aid student's ability to focus on their studies during pharmacy school, working to identify early flags that a student may need extra support to succeed, focusing on aligning what is taught in the classroom with what is being tested on the examination, and promotion of remediation strategies to ensure mastery of material.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 11","pages":"Article 102435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187712972500156X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Identify factors perceived by pharmacy educators to be associated with declining North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) first-time pass rates to highlight potential focused areas of further research or consideration.

Methods

Qualitative responses from a single open-ended question, “What other factors not addressed in this survey do you believe are influencing the decline in NAPLEX first-time pass rates?”, were analyzed using thematic analysis. This question was part of a 43-item Qualtrics™ questionnaire developed to gather insight from pharmacy educators regarding the impact of various factors on the declining NAPLEX first-time pass rates. Due to the large number of responses, qualitative data was analyzed separately from quantitative data.

Results

Two hundred and seventy-one qualitative responses were recorded. The analysis revealed five second-level, or higher-order categories, and sixteen first-level, descriptive codes which were used for analysis. The categories included external factors, student factors, faculty characteristics, pharmacy program challenges, and NAPLEX challenges. The first level codes included a variety of themes such as financial insecurity, increased student diversity, faculty accountability, and accreditation pressure.

Conclusions

Pharmacy educators perceive that many factors could be influencing declining first-time NAPLEX pass rates. Based on the data included in this manuscript, items to consider include providing additional financial support to aid student's ability to focus on their studies during pharmacy school, working to identify early flags that a student may need extra support to succeed, focusing on aligning what is taught in the classroom with what is being tested on the examination, and promotion of remediation strategies to ensure mastery of material.
药学教育工作者对北美药剂师执照考试(NAPLEX)首次通过率下降的看法
目的确定药学教育工作者认为与北美药剂师执照考试(NAPLEX)首次通过率下降有关的因素,以突出潜在的进一步研究或考虑的重点领域。方法对一个开放式问题进行定性回答,“您认为本次调查中未涉及的其他因素是否影响了NAPLEX首次通过率的下降?”,采用主题分析法进行分析。这个问题是一份包含43个项目的Qualtrics™问卷的一部分,该问卷旨在收集药学教育工作者关于各种因素对NAPLEX首次通过率下降的影响的见解。由于回复数量较多,定性数据与定量数据分开分析。结果共获得271份定性问卷。分析揭示了5个二级或更高阶的类别,以及16个用于分析的一级描述性代码。这些因素包括外部因素、学生因素、教师特点、药学项目挑战和NAPLEX挑战。第一级准则包括各种主题,如财务不安全、学生多样性增加、教师问责制和认证压力。结论药学教育工作者认为影响NAPLEX首次通过率下降的因素有很多。根据本文中包含的数据,需要考虑的项目包括提供额外的经济支持,以帮助学生在药学院期间专注于学习的能力,努力识别学生可能需要额外支持才能成功的早期信号,注重将课堂上教授的内容与考试中的测试内容相结合,以及促进补习策略以确保对材料的掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信