Programmable flow heart cutting solid phase extraction using polydopamine coated microfibrous sorbent as a front-end to UHPLC for direct determination of xenobiotic residues in surface water
Lucie Chocholoušová Havlíková , Petr Chocholouš , Jakub Erben , Pavel Holec , František Švec , Dalibor Šatínský
{"title":"Programmable flow heart cutting solid phase extraction using polydopamine coated microfibrous sorbent as a front-end to UHPLC for direct determination of xenobiotic residues in surface water","authors":"Lucie Chocholoušová Havlíková , Petr Chocholouš , Jakub Erben , Pavel Holec , František Švec , Dalibor Šatínský","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automation and hyphenation of multiple steps were used for the sensitive determination of xenobiotic residues in surface waters. The online hyphenated sequential injection analysis instrumentation used surface-modified microfibrous sorbent for the effective solid phase extraction of 1.0 mL of sample into 100 μL zone, then subjected to the reversed-phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (SIA-SPE-UHPLC). The SPE column was packed with polypropylene microfibers and coated with polydopamine by rinsing with the dopamine solution. The freshly prepared column was used for highly reproducible extraction of more than 200 samples in the SIA-SPE-UHPLC method. The matrix calibration covered the expected range with limits of detection in the range 0.1–0.9 μg/L. The method precision was <13 % RSD (at 3 concentration levels), and the method accuracy was in the range 86.5–114.8 %. The sample throughput of the method was 5 samples/hour when the separation took 12 min, including a 5 min SPE step of the next sample run in parallel. The performance of the developed method was demonstrated with the analysis of fifteen river water samples spiked with eleven residues of xenobiotics (ivermectin, fenbendazole, praziquantel, ibuprofen, diclofenac, 17α-ethynylestradiol, androstenedione, carbamazepine, omeprazole, sotalol, and caffeine) at the levels typical for such monitoring. Initial sample treatment prior to the automated analysis consisted only of methanol addition, pH adjustment, and centrifugation. The innovations in the manifold and process that contribute to the modern and effective analysis of environmental samples are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 128571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914025010616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Automation and hyphenation of multiple steps were used for the sensitive determination of xenobiotic residues in surface waters. The online hyphenated sequential injection analysis instrumentation used surface-modified microfibrous sorbent for the effective solid phase extraction of 1.0 mL of sample into 100 μL zone, then subjected to the reversed-phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (SIA-SPE-UHPLC). The SPE column was packed with polypropylene microfibers and coated with polydopamine by rinsing with the dopamine solution. The freshly prepared column was used for highly reproducible extraction of more than 200 samples in the SIA-SPE-UHPLC method. The matrix calibration covered the expected range with limits of detection in the range 0.1–0.9 μg/L. The method precision was <13 % RSD (at 3 concentration levels), and the method accuracy was in the range 86.5–114.8 %. The sample throughput of the method was 5 samples/hour when the separation took 12 min, including a 5 min SPE step of the next sample run in parallel. The performance of the developed method was demonstrated with the analysis of fifteen river water samples spiked with eleven residues of xenobiotics (ivermectin, fenbendazole, praziquantel, ibuprofen, diclofenac, 17α-ethynylestradiol, androstenedione, carbamazepine, omeprazole, sotalol, and caffeine) at the levels typical for such monitoring. Initial sample treatment prior to the automated analysis consisted only of methanol addition, pH adjustment, and centrifugation. The innovations in the manifold and process that contribute to the modern and effective analysis of environmental samples are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.