Yingli Shen , Gang Liu , Ju Gu , Chengbo Shu , Kai Wang , Qiong Zhang , Han Luo , Chutian Zhang , Zhen Guo
{"title":"Predicting soil erosion rates of farmland with different slope shapes in Northeast China by using the improved RUSLE2 model","authors":"Yingli Shen , Gang Liu , Ju Gu , Chengbo Shu , Kai Wang , Qiong Zhang , Han Luo , Chutian Zhang , Zhen Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) is widely used for regional soil erosion estimation. However, its performance on croplands in the Mollisol region of Northeast China remains insufficiently quantified, particularly for areas characterized by long and gentle (> 100 m and < 10°) and with different slope shapes (convex, straight, concave). This study integrated ¹ ³⁷Cs tracing technique to identify systematic underestimation errors in RUSLE2 predictions, primarily caused by oversimplified linear assumptions in conventional slope length factor (<em>λ</em>) calculations. To address this limitation, this study employed Random Forest Regression (RFR) to model non-linear <em>λ-</em><span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>slope shape</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> relationships, where <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>slope shape</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> represents the slope shape weight factor. The results revealed that the distribution of predicted and measured erosion-deposition rates across different slope shapes exhibited a clear alternating pattern of strong and weak values. Furthermore, the fluctuations in the predicted values were aligned with alterations in the slope gradient. Both predicted and measured mean erosion rates on different slopes were in the order that convex > straight > concave. The optimized model significantly improved predictive performance, with slope length (<em>λ</em>) and slope shape factor (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>slope shape</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) as the key factors. The model demonstrated strong adaptability, with the highest predictive accuracy achieved for concave (<em>R² =</em> 0.99<em>*</em>), followed by straight (<em>R² =</em> 0.88<em>*</em>) and convex (<em>R² =</em> 0.82<em>*</em>) slopes. This study provides theoretical support for improving soil erosion prediction models and a scientific basis for optimizing soil and water conservation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106760"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725003149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) is widely used for regional soil erosion estimation. However, its performance on croplands in the Mollisol region of Northeast China remains insufficiently quantified, particularly for areas characterized by long and gentle (> 100 m and < 10°) and with different slope shapes (convex, straight, concave). This study integrated ¹ ³⁷Cs tracing technique to identify systematic underestimation errors in RUSLE2 predictions, primarily caused by oversimplified linear assumptions in conventional slope length factor (λ) calculations. To address this limitation, this study employed Random Forest Regression (RFR) to model non-linear λ- relationships, where represents the slope shape weight factor. The results revealed that the distribution of predicted and measured erosion-deposition rates across different slope shapes exhibited a clear alternating pattern of strong and weak values. Furthermore, the fluctuations in the predicted values were aligned with alterations in the slope gradient. Both predicted and measured mean erosion rates on different slopes were in the order that convex > straight > concave. The optimized model significantly improved predictive performance, with slope length (λ) and slope shape factor () as the key factors. The model demonstrated strong adaptability, with the highest predictive accuracy achieved for concave (R² = 0.99*), followed by straight (R² = 0.88*) and convex (R² = 0.82*) slopes. This study provides theoretical support for improving soil erosion prediction models and a scientific basis for optimizing soil and water conservation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.