Soft fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits using supervised machine learning

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
M.I. Dieste-Velasco
{"title":"Soft fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits using supervised machine learning","authors":"M.I. Dieste-Velasco","doi":"10.1016/j.vlsi.2025.102482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analog circuits are commonly used in a wide range of industrial applications, and their assessment is of great importance to ensure proper functionality and prevent faults. However, this task is not as fully developed and is significantly less advanced compared to the assessment of digital circuits, as soft faults are particularly difficult to detect in analog circuits. This study addresses the application of supervised classification techniques for the detection and classification of soft faults in analog circuits. A feature extraction methodology is proposed based on voltage measurements at key circuit points and across different frequencies, enabling precise characterization of system behavior. From this feature, a benchmark employing different machine learning methods was used. The evaluated classifiers include k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Discriminant Analysis Classifier (DAC), Classification Decision Tree (CDT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Each model was optimized through hyperparameter tuning and validated using cross-validation techniques. The results indicate that ANN and SVM achieved the best performance, attaining an accuracy of 97.92 % and 97.22 % on test data, with a global Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 97.76 % and 97.01 %, respectively. Although RF obtained the highest training accuracy (99.39 %), its performance significantly dropped during testing (93.06 %, MCC of 92.52 %), indicating overfitting. Additionally, models such as KNN and DAC demonstrated solid performance, whereas NB and CDT were the least effective. These findings highlight the importance of carefully selecting both the feature set and the classification model for fault detection in electronic circuits. A Sallen-Key band-pass filter was used as the circuit under test (CUT), as soft fault classification in this type of circuit is particularly challenging. This study demonstrates that it is possible to accurately predict faults in circuits similar to the one analyzed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54973,"journal":{"name":"Integration-The Vlsi Journal","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integration-The Vlsi Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167926025001397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analog circuits are commonly used in a wide range of industrial applications, and their assessment is of great importance to ensure proper functionality and prevent faults. However, this task is not as fully developed and is significantly less advanced compared to the assessment of digital circuits, as soft faults are particularly difficult to detect in analog circuits. This study addresses the application of supervised classification techniques for the detection and classification of soft faults in analog circuits. A feature extraction methodology is proposed based on voltage measurements at key circuit points and across different frequencies, enabling precise characterization of system behavior. From this feature, a benchmark employing different machine learning methods was used. The evaluated classifiers include k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Discriminant Analysis Classifier (DAC), Classification Decision Tree (CDT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Each model was optimized through hyperparameter tuning and validated using cross-validation techniques. The results indicate that ANN and SVM achieved the best performance, attaining an accuracy of 97.92 % and 97.22 % on test data, with a global Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 97.76 % and 97.01 %, respectively. Although RF obtained the highest training accuracy (99.39 %), its performance significantly dropped during testing (93.06 %, MCC of 92.52 %), indicating overfitting. Additionally, models such as KNN and DAC demonstrated solid performance, whereas NB and CDT were the least effective. These findings highlight the importance of carefully selecting both the feature set and the classification model for fault detection in electronic circuits. A Sallen-Key band-pass filter was used as the circuit under test (CUT), as soft fault classification in this type of circuit is particularly challenging. This study demonstrates that it is possible to accurately predict faults in circuits similar to the one analyzed.
基于监督机器学习的模拟电路软故障诊断
模拟电路广泛应用于工业应用中,其评估对于确保其正常功能和防止故障至关重要。然而,与数字电路的评估相比,这项任务并没有完全发展,而且明显不那么先进,因为在模拟电路中软故障特别难以检测。本研究探讨了监督分类技术在模拟电路软故障检测和分类中的应用。提出了一种基于关键电路点和不同频率电压测量的特征提取方法,能够精确表征系统行为。根据这一特征,使用了采用不同机器学习方法的基准。评估的分类器包括k-近邻(KNN)、Naïve贝叶斯(NB)、判别分析分类器(DAC)、分类决策树(CDT)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)。每个模型都通过超参数调优进行优化,并使用交叉验证技术进行验证。结果表明,人工神经网络和支持向量机在测试数据上的准确率分别为97.92%和97.22%,整体马修斯相关系数(MCC)分别为97.76%和97.01%。虽然RF获得了最高的训练准确率(99.39%),但在测试过程中其性能显著下降(93.06%,MCC为92.52%),表明过拟合。此外,KNN和DAC等模型表现出稳定的性能,而NB和CDT的效果最差。这些发现强调了在电子电路故障检测中仔细选择特征集和分类模型的重要性。在测试电路(CUT)中使用了一个萨伦键带通滤波器,因为在这种类型的电路中进行软故障分类特别具有挑战性。这项研究表明,在与所分析的电路相似的电路中,准确预测故障是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integration-The Vlsi Journal
Integration-The Vlsi Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Integration''s aim is to cover every aspect of the VLSI area, with an emphasis on cross-fertilization between various fields of science, and the design, verification, test and applications of integrated circuits and systems, as well as closely related topics in process and device technologies. Individual issues will feature peer-reviewed tutorials and articles as well as reviews of recent publications. The intended coverage of the journal can be assessed by examining the following (non-exclusive) list of topics: Specification methods and languages; Analog/Digital Integrated Circuits and Systems; VLSI architectures; Algorithms, methods and tools for modeling, simulation, synthesis and verification of integrated circuits and systems of any complexity; Embedded systems; High-level synthesis for VLSI systems; Logic synthesis and finite automata; Testing, design-for-test and test generation algorithms; Physical design; Formal verification; Algorithms implemented in VLSI systems; Systems engineering; Heterogeneous systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信