Optimal dosing and duration of linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nakwon Kwak,Joong-Yub Kim,Areum Han,Catherine Berry,Maria Beumont,Tweed Conor,Angela Crook,Keertan Dheda,Stella Fabiane,Muse O Fadeyi,Salah Foraida,Tinne Gils,Thi Thanh,Thuy Hoang,Menal A Jham,Richard A Murphy,Binh Hoa Nguyen,Thi Mai,Phuong Nguyen,Bern Thomas Nyang'wa,Suzette Oelofse,Seokyung Hahn,Jae-Joon Yim
{"title":"Optimal dosing and duration of linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis.","authors":"Nakwon Kwak,Joong-Yub Kim,Areum Han,Catherine Berry,Maria Beumont,Tweed Conor,Angela Crook,Keertan Dheda,Stella Fabiane,Muse O Fadeyi,Salah Foraida,Tinne Gils,Thi Thanh,Thuy Hoang,Menal A Jham,Richard A Murphy,Binh Hoa Nguyen,Thi Mai,Phuong Nguyen,Bern Thomas Nyang'wa,Suzette Oelofse,Seokyung Hahn,Jae-Joon Yim","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00315-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe optimal dosing strategy of linezolid for treating multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) remains unclear. We conducted an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to determine the optimal linezolid dosing strategy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies on short-course, all-oral regimens containing linezolid for treating MDR/RR-TB through 31 August 2023. Patients were grouped according to linezolid dosing patterns. Time to treatment success and adverse events≥grade 3 were analysed using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 12 eligible studies, 8 (4 RCTs, 4 prospective) were included. Overall, 945 patients were grouped as follows: group 1 (600 mg linezolid for 8 weeks), group 2 (600 mg for 16 weeks, then 300 mg for 8 weeks), group 3 (600 mg for 39 weeks), and group 4 (1200 mg for 25 weeks). Proportions of patients achieving treatment success were 59·1%, 90·4%, 91·3%, and 96·0%, respectively. Compared with group 2, groups 1 (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [aSHR], 0·24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0·08-0·71) and 3 (aSHR, 0·36, 95% CI, 0·16-0·81) had lower success rates. While group 4 showed no significant difference in treatment success versus group 2 (aSHR, 0·57, 95% CI, 0·23-1·43), it had a higher rate of adverse events≥grade 3 (aSHR, 2·29, 95% CI, 1·37-3·83).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nA dosing strategy of 600 mg linezolid daily for 16 weeks, then 300 mg for 8 weeks, could be optimal for treating MDR/RR-TB when considering effectiveness and safety.","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00315-2025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The optimal dosing strategy of linezolid for treating multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) remains unclear. We conducted an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to determine the optimal linezolid dosing strategy. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies on short-course, all-oral regimens containing linezolid for treating MDR/RR-TB through 31 August 2023. Patients were grouped according to linezolid dosing patterns. Time to treatment success and adverse events≥grade 3 were analysed using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model. RESULTS Of 12 eligible studies, 8 (4 RCTs, 4 prospective) were included. Overall, 945 patients were grouped as follows: group 1 (600 mg linezolid for 8 weeks), group 2 (600 mg for 16 weeks, then 300 mg for 8 weeks), group 3 (600 mg for 39 weeks), and group 4 (1200 mg for 25 weeks). Proportions of patients achieving treatment success were 59·1%, 90·4%, 91·3%, and 96·0%, respectively. Compared with group 2, groups 1 (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [aSHR], 0·24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0·08-0·71) and 3 (aSHR, 0·36, 95% CI, 0·16-0·81) had lower success rates. While group 4 showed no significant difference in treatment success versus group 2 (aSHR, 0·57, 95% CI, 0·23-1·43), it had a higher rate of adverse events≥grade 3 (aSHR, 2·29, 95% CI, 1·37-3·83). CONCLUSION A dosing strategy of 600 mg linezolid daily for 16 weeks, then 300 mg for 8 weeks, could be optimal for treating MDR/RR-TB when considering effectiveness and safety.
利奈唑胺治疗耐多药和利福平耐药结核病的最佳剂量和持续时间:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
背景:利奈唑胺治疗耐多药和利福平耐药结核病(MDR/RR-TB)的最佳给药策略尚不清楚。我们进行了个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,以确定最佳利奈唑胺给药策略。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus,检索截至2023年8月31日含利奈唑胺治疗MDR/RR-TB的短期全口服方案的随机对照试验(rct)和前瞻性队列研究。根据利奈唑胺给药模式对患者进行分组。使用Fine-Gray亚分布风险模型分析治疗成功时间和不良事件≥3级。结果在12项符合条件的研究中,纳入8项(4项随机对照试验,4项前瞻性研究)。总体而言,945名患者分为以下组:1组(600 mg利奈唑胺,8周),2组(600 mg, 16周,然后300 mg, 8周),3组(600 mg, 39周),和4组(1200 mg, 25周)。治疗成功率分别为59.1%、94%、93%和96.0%。与2组相比,1组(调整后亚分布风险比[aSHR], 0.24, 95%可信区间[CI], 0.08 - 0.71)和3组(aSHR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.16 - 0.81)的成功率较低。第4组治疗成功率与第2组比较无显著差异(aSHR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.23 - 1.43),但不良事件≥3级发生率较高(aSHR, 2.29, 95% CI, 1.37 - 3.83)。结论考虑疗效和安全性,每日600 mg利奈唑胺连用16周,然后300 mg连用8周是治疗MDR/RR-TB的最佳给药策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信