Double C-Loop Haptic Lenses Are Rotationally Stable - A Systematic Review.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-07-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S536114
Sheraz Daya, Christophe Chassain, Christophe Pagnoulle
{"title":"Double C-Loop Haptic Lenses Are Rotationally Stable - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sheraz Daya, Christophe Chassain, Christophe Pagnoulle","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S536114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical rotational stability outcomes reported in patients following implantation of the POD platform with double C-loop haptics. A literature search in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) was carried out to find publications, both prospective and retrospective, which report rotational stability outcomes in patients who were implanted with this platform after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgeries. This platform is used in different commercially available intraocular lenses (IOLs), both monofocal and trifocal, made of hydrophilic or hydrophobic material. 19 clinical peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024 were included in this review. The data reported in the clinical publications was analyzed in detail, focusing on rotational stability (mean rotation values and ranges, and percentage of eyes with some degrees of rotation), measurement methods and rotation follow-up period. Our review encompassed a total of 1428 eyes implanted with the POD platform analyzed at different follow-up periods, up to a maximum of 26 months. The mean rotation across all the studies was 2.61 °.The analysis carried out in this review leads us to conclude that the POD platform provides good rotational stability when used with different IOL models based on monofocal or trifocal designs and made using hydrophilic or hydrophobic material.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"2259-2269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S536114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical rotational stability outcomes reported in patients following implantation of the POD platform with double C-loop haptics. A literature search in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) was carried out to find publications, both prospective and retrospective, which report rotational stability outcomes in patients who were implanted with this platform after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgeries. This platform is used in different commercially available intraocular lenses (IOLs), both monofocal and trifocal, made of hydrophilic or hydrophobic material. 19 clinical peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024 were included in this review. The data reported in the clinical publications was analyzed in detail, focusing on rotational stability (mean rotation values and ranges, and percentage of eyes with some degrees of rotation), measurement methods and rotation follow-up period. Our review encompassed a total of 1428 eyes implanted with the POD platform analyzed at different follow-up periods, up to a maximum of 26 months. The mean rotation across all the studies was 2.61 °.The analysis carried out in this review leads us to conclude that the POD platform provides good rotational stability when used with different IOL models based on monofocal or trifocal designs and made using hydrophilic or hydrophobic material.

双c环触觉透镜旋转稳定-系统综述。
本综述的目的是总结双c环触觉POD平台植入后患者的临床旋转稳定性结果。在PubMed(美国国家医学图书馆)中进行了文献检索,以寻找前瞻性和回顾性的出版物,这些出版物报道了白内障或屈光晶体置换手术后植入该平台的患者的旋转稳定性结果。该平台用于不同的市售人工晶状体(iol),包括单焦点和三焦点,由亲水性或疏水性材料制成。本综述纳入了2013年至2024年间发表的19项临床同行评议研究。对临床文献报道的数据进行详细分析,重点关注旋转稳定性(平均旋转值和范围,以及有一定程度旋转的眼睛的百分比),测量方法和旋转随访时间。我们的回顾包括了1428只植入POD平台的眼睛,在不同的随访期间进行了分析,最长随访时间为26个月。所有研究的平均旋转度为2.61°。本综述的分析使我们得出结论,POD平台在使用基于单焦点或三焦点设计的不同IOL模型并使用亲水或疏水材料时具有良好的旋转稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信