Giulia Lopes Corte Mainardi, Vinicius Aniceto, João Vitor Zaniboni de Assumpção, Caio Antonio de Campos Prado, Ana Carolina Tagliatti Zani Mantovi, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés
{"title":"Impact of legal regulation on elective cesarean sections in a secondary complexity maternity hospital in São Paulo state.","authors":"Giulia Lopes Corte Mainardi, Vinicius Aniceto, João Vitor Zaniboni de Assumpção, Caio Antonio de Campos Prado, Ana Carolina Tagliatti Zani Mantovi, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of São Paulo State Law n° 17.137/2019 on the cesarean section rate at a public secondary-level maternity hospital and to analyze predictive factors and complications associated with cesarean under request. This law was enacted to allow pregnant women in São Paulo to request a cesarean section without medical indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed medical records of pregnant women ≥ 39 weeks gestation attended at the Ribeirão Preto Women's Health Reference Center (CRSMRP-Mater). Two groups were evaluated: 1,999 patients before the law (July 2018-July 2019) and 3,207 after its implementation (August 2019-July 2021, excluding the suspension period). Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cesarean rates increased significantly from 23.6% to 27.7% (p < 0.01), with 15,1% of cesareans during the law period being under maternal request (134 patients). A previous cesarean was the only factor significantly associated with electing a new cesarean. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the law period (p < 0.01), possibly reflecting the increased cesarean rate. No significant differences were observed in maternal or neonatal complications between cesareans under request and those conducted for medical reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>São Paulo State Law n°. 17.137/2019 was associated with an increased cesarean rate in CRSMRP-Mater. The findings highlight the need for robust educational approaches and evidence-based obstetric practices to reduce unnecessary elective cesareans.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of São Paulo State Law n° 17.137/2019 on the cesarean section rate at a public secondary-level maternity hospital and to analyze predictive factors and complications associated with cesarean under request. This law was enacted to allow pregnant women in São Paulo to request a cesarean section without medical indication.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed medical records of pregnant women ≥ 39 weeks gestation attended at the Ribeirão Preto Women's Health Reference Center (CRSMRP-Mater). Two groups were evaluated: 1,999 patients before the law (July 2018-July 2019) and 3,207 after its implementation (August 2019-July 2021, excluding the suspension period). Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were applied.
Results: The overall cesarean rates increased significantly from 23.6% to 27.7% (p < 0.01), with 15,1% of cesareans during the law period being under maternal request (134 patients). A previous cesarean was the only factor significantly associated with electing a new cesarean. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the law period (p < 0.01), possibly reflecting the increased cesarean rate. No significant differences were observed in maternal or neonatal complications between cesareans under request and those conducted for medical reasons.
Conclusion: São Paulo State Law n°. 17.137/2019 was associated with an increased cesarean rate in CRSMRP-Mater. The findings highlight the need for robust educational approaches and evidence-based obstetric practices to reduce unnecessary elective cesareans.