Pedro Brandão, Rui Cândido, Fábio Carvalho, Liliane Nunes, Patrícia Matos, Pedro Frias, Marisa Coelho
{"title":"Exploring awareness and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among women of reproductive age.","authors":"Pedro Brandão, Rui Cândido, Fábio Carvalho, Liliane Nunes, Patrícia Matos, Pedro Frias, Marisa Coelho","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among a diverse group of women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2023 using snowball sampling to distribute a structured questionnaire. The target population included women aged 18+ with childbearing potential, proficient in English. An anonymous online survey with 22 questions collected data on demographics, education, occupation, relationship status, reproductive intentions, and perceptions of oocyte cryopreservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 502 responses were analyzed. Most participants were in their thirties, had higher education, and were in committed relationships. They represented 24 countries, mainly in Europe. Over 60% planned to have children, but 85% were unfamiliar with oocyte cryopreservation. Social media (56%) was the primary information source, followed by acquaintances (33%) and healthcare professionals (25%). Only 4.6% were actively considering the procedure, while 41.3% showed potential interest. Barriers included perceived lack of necessity, age concerns, and limited information. Women considering cryopreservation were typically younger and childless. Financial constraints and information gaps significantly influenced decision-making, with about one-third suggesting better information and cost reduction could increase willingness to pursue the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite relatively high awareness of oocyte cryopreservation, actual consideration and uptake remain low. Addressing financial and informational barriers could improve acceptance, especially among younger women and those uncertain about their reproductive plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among a diverse group of women.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2023 using snowball sampling to distribute a structured questionnaire. The target population included women aged 18+ with childbearing potential, proficient in English. An anonymous online survey with 22 questions collected data on demographics, education, occupation, relationship status, reproductive intentions, and perceptions of oocyte cryopreservation.
Results: A total of 502 responses were analyzed. Most participants were in their thirties, had higher education, and were in committed relationships. They represented 24 countries, mainly in Europe. Over 60% planned to have children, but 85% were unfamiliar with oocyte cryopreservation. Social media (56%) was the primary information source, followed by acquaintances (33%) and healthcare professionals (25%). Only 4.6% were actively considering the procedure, while 41.3% showed potential interest. Barriers included perceived lack of necessity, age concerns, and limited information. Women considering cryopreservation were typically younger and childless. Financial constraints and information gaps significantly influenced decision-making, with about one-third suggesting better information and cost reduction could increase willingness to pursue the procedure.
Conclusion: Despite relatively high awareness of oocyte cryopreservation, actual consideration and uptake remain low. Addressing financial and informational barriers could improve acceptance, especially among younger women and those uncertain about their reproductive plans.