Machine-learning of medical cannabis chemical profiles reveals analgesia beyond placebo expectations.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Adi Hatav, Yelena Vysotski, Anna Shapira, Shiri Procaccia, David Meiri, Dvir Aran
{"title":"Machine-learning of medical cannabis chemical profiles reveals analgesia beyond placebo expectations.","authors":"Adi Hatav, Yelena Vysotski, Anna Shapira, Shiri Procaccia, David Meiri, Dvir Aran","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00996-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of medical cannabis in alleviating pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet questions remain regarding the extent to which specific chemical compounds contribute to analgesia versus expectation-based (placebo) responses. Effective blinding is notoriously difficult in cannabis trials, complicating the identification of compound-specific effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study of 329 chronic pain patients (40% females; aged 48.9 ± 15.5) prescribed medical cannabis, we examined whether the chemical composition of cannabis cultivars could predict treatment outcomes. We used a Random Forest classifier with nested cross-validation to assess the predictive value of demographics, clinical features, and approximately 200 chemical compounds. Model robustness was evaluated using six additional machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here we show that incorporating chemical composition markedly improves the prediction of pain relief (AUC = 0.63 ± 0.10) compared to models using only demographic and clinical features (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). This result is consistent across all models tested. While well-known cannabinoids such as THC and CBD provide limited predictive value, specific terpenoids, particularly α-Bisabolol and eucalyptol, emerge as key predictors of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that pain relief can be predicted from cannabis chemical profiles that are unknown to patients, providing evidence for compound-specific therapeutic effects. These results highlight the importance of considering the full range of cannabis compounds when developing more precise and effective cannabis-based therapies for pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00996-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of medical cannabis in alleviating pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet questions remain regarding the extent to which specific chemical compounds contribute to analgesia versus expectation-based (placebo) responses. Effective blinding is notoriously difficult in cannabis trials, complicating the identification of compound-specific effects.

Methods: In a prospective study of 329 chronic pain patients (40% females; aged 48.9 ± 15.5) prescribed medical cannabis, we examined whether the chemical composition of cannabis cultivars could predict treatment outcomes. We used a Random Forest classifier with nested cross-validation to assess the predictive value of demographics, clinical features, and approximately 200 chemical compounds. Model robustness was evaluated using six additional machine learning algorithms.

Results: Here we show that incorporating chemical composition markedly improves the prediction of pain relief (AUC = 0.63 ± 0.10) compared to models using only demographic and clinical features (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). This result is consistent across all models tested. While well-known cannabinoids such as THC and CBD provide limited predictive value, specific terpenoids, particularly α-Bisabolol and eucalyptol, emerge as key predictors of treatment response.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that pain relief can be predicted from cannabis chemical profiles that are unknown to patients, providing evidence for compound-specific therapeutic effects. These results highlight the importance of considering the full range of cannabis compounds when developing more precise and effective cannabis-based therapies for pain management.

对医用大麻化学成分的机器学习揭示了超出安慰剂预期的镇痛作用。
背景:医用大麻在缓解疼痛方面的功效已在临床试验中得到证实,但关于特定化合物在多大程度上有助于镇痛,而不是基于预期的(安慰剂)反应,问题仍然存在。在大麻试验中,有效的盲法是出了名的困难,使化合物特异性效应的识别变得复杂。方法:对329例慢性疼痛患者(女性40%;年龄为48.9±15.5岁,使用医用大麻,研究大麻品种的化学成分是否能预测治疗结果。我们使用随机森林分类器嵌套交叉验证来评估人口统计学、临床特征和大约200种化合物的预测价值。使用六种额外的机器学习算法评估模型的鲁棒性。结果:本研究表明,与仅使用人口统计学和临床特征的模型(AUC = 0.52±0.09;结论:我们的研究结果表明,疼痛缓解可以从大麻的化学特征预测,不知道病人,提供证据的化合物特异性治疗效果。这些结果强调了在开发更精确和有效的基于大麻的疼痛管理疗法时考虑大麻化合物的全部范围的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信