Misbah Noshela Ghazanfar, Ali Al-Mousawi, Christian Riemer, Benóný Þór Björnsson, Charlotte Boissard, Ivy Lee, Zarqa Ali, Simon Francis Thomsen
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Machine Learning-Enabled Skincare Recommendation for Mild-to-Moderate Acne Vulgaris: 8-Week Evaluator-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Misbah Noshela Ghazanfar, Ali Al-Mousawi, Christian Riemer, Benóný Þór Björnsson, Charlotte Boissard, Ivy Lee, Zarqa Ali, Simon Francis Thomsen","doi":"10.2196/60883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne vulgaris (AV) is one of the most common skin disorders, with a peak incidence in adolescence and early adulthood. Topical treatments are usually used for mild to moderate AV; however, a lack of adherence to topical treatment is seen in patients due to various reasons. Therefore, personalized skincare recommendations may be beneficial for treating mild-to-moderate AV.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel machine learning approach in predicting the optimal treatment for mild-to-moderate AV based on self-assessment and objective measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group study was conducted on 100 patients recruited from an internet-based database and randomized in a 1:1 ratio (groups A and B) based on their consent form submission. Groups A and B received customized product recommendations using a Bayesian machine learning model and self-selected treatments, respectively. The patients submitted self-assessed disease scores and photographs after the 8-week treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were photograph evaluation by two board-certified dermatologists using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scores and quality of life (QoL) measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 99 patients were screened, and 68 patients (mean age: 27 years, SD 4.56 years) were randomized into groups A (customized) and B (self-selected). IGA scores significantly improved after treatment in group A but not in group B (mean difference in IGA score; group A=0.32, P=.04 vs group B=0.09, P=.54). The DLQI significantly improved in group A from 7.75 at baseline to 3.5 (P<.001) after treatment but reduced in group B from 7.53 to 5.3 (P>.05). IGA scores and the DLQI were significantly correlated in group A, but not in group B. A total of 3 patients reported adverse reactions in group B, but none in group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a machine learning model for personalized skincare recommendations significantly reduced symptoms and improved severity and overall QoL of patients with mild-to-moderate AV, supporting the potential of machine learning-based personalized treatment options in dermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e60883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acne vulgaris (AV) is one of the most common skin disorders, with a peak incidence in adolescence and early adulthood. Topical treatments are usually used for mild to moderate AV; however, a lack of adherence to topical treatment is seen in patients due to various reasons. Therefore, personalized skincare recommendations may be beneficial for treating mild-to-moderate AV.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel machine learning approach in predicting the optimal treatment for mild-to-moderate AV based on self-assessment and objective measures.
Methods: A randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group study was conducted on 100 patients recruited from an internet-based database and randomized in a 1:1 ratio (groups A and B) based on their consent form submission. Groups A and B received customized product recommendations using a Bayesian machine learning model and self-selected treatments, respectively. The patients submitted self-assessed disease scores and photographs after the 8-week treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were photograph evaluation by two board-certified dermatologists using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scores and quality of life (QoL) measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), respectively.
Results: Overall, 99 patients were screened, and 68 patients (mean age: 27 years, SD 4.56 years) were randomized into groups A (customized) and B (self-selected). IGA scores significantly improved after treatment in group A but not in group B (mean difference in IGA score; group A=0.32, P=.04 vs group B=0.09, P=.54). The DLQI significantly improved in group A from 7.75 at baseline to 3.5 (P<.001) after treatment but reduced in group B from 7.53 to 5.3 (P>.05). IGA scores and the DLQI were significantly correlated in group A, but not in group B. A total of 3 patients reported adverse reactions in group B, but none in group A.
Conclusions: Using a machine learning model for personalized skincare recommendations significantly reduced symptoms and improved severity and overall QoL of patients with mild-to-moderate AV, supporting the potential of machine learning-based personalized treatment options in dermatology.