The moderating effect of passenger presence on the relationship between driver age and crash culpability: The co-driving influence of passengers.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gilsu Pae, Michelle L Reyes, Elizabeth O'Neal, Joseph Cavanaugh, Cara Hamann
{"title":"The moderating effect of passenger presence on the relationship between driver age and crash culpability: The co-driving influence of passengers.","authors":"Gilsu Pae, Michelle L Reyes, Elizabeth O'Neal, Joseph Cavanaugh, Cara Hamann","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2522242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Passenger presence influences driver behavior and safety, with its effects shaped by the situational awareness shared between drivers and passengers. This awareness depends on factors such as driving experience and cognitive and physical abilities, which vary across age groups. However, little research has investigated how passenger presence moderates the relationship between driver age and crash culpability. This study examines the relationship between driver age and crash culpability, focusing on the moderating effect of passenger presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed crash data from the Iowa Department of Transportation from 2015 to 2020, focusing on drivers involved in failure-to-yield crashes (<i>N</i> = 36,577). The analytic sample was limited to multiple-vehicle collisions where the crash report indicated only one driver contributed to the crash. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to examine predictors of culpability among drivers involved in failure-to-yield crashes, with a focus on passenger presence and its interaction with driver age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Passenger presence was significantly associated with a reduced probability of drivers being culpable in failure-to-yield crashes, with front-seat passengers having a significant effect for middle- and older-aged driver groups. The association was not significant for drivers aged 14-44 but attained significance for those aged 45 and older. Middle-aged drivers (45-64), who may begin to experience age-related declines in driving ability, benefited the most from front-seat passenger presence. The oldest drivers (75+) had a substantially higher probability of being culpable without passengers compared to the youngest drivers (14-24), whereas their probability was similar to that of the youngest drivers when accompanied by passengers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meaningful differences in the probability of drivers being culpable between presence and absence of front-seat passengers highlight the potential of passengers as co-drivers for safe driving, offering insights for developing effective road safety interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2522242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Passenger presence influences driver behavior and safety, with its effects shaped by the situational awareness shared between drivers and passengers. This awareness depends on factors such as driving experience and cognitive and physical abilities, which vary across age groups. However, little research has investigated how passenger presence moderates the relationship between driver age and crash culpability. This study examines the relationship between driver age and crash culpability, focusing on the moderating effect of passenger presence.

Methods: This study analyzed crash data from the Iowa Department of Transportation from 2015 to 2020, focusing on drivers involved in failure-to-yield crashes (N = 36,577). The analytic sample was limited to multiple-vehicle collisions where the crash report indicated only one driver contributed to the crash. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to examine predictors of culpability among drivers involved in failure-to-yield crashes, with a focus on passenger presence and its interaction with driver age group.

Results: Passenger presence was significantly associated with a reduced probability of drivers being culpable in failure-to-yield crashes, with front-seat passengers having a significant effect for middle- and older-aged driver groups. The association was not significant for drivers aged 14-44 but attained significance for those aged 45 and older. Middle-aged drivers (45-64), who may begin to experience age-related declines in driving ability, benefited the most from front-seat passenger presence. The oldest drivers (75+) had a substantially higher probability of being culpable without passengers compared to the youngest drivers (14-24), whereas their probability was similar to that of the youngest drivers when accompanied by passengers.

Conclusions: The meaningful differences in the probability of drivers being culpable between presence and absence of front-seat passengers highlight the potential of passengers as co-drivers for safe driving, offering insights for developing effective road safety interventions.

乘客存在对驾驶员年龄与事故罪责关系的调节作用:乘客共同驾驶的影响。
目的:乘客存在影响驾驶员行为和安全,其影响由驾驶员和乘客之间共享的态势感知决定。这种意识取决于驾驶经验、认知能力和身体能力等因素,而这些因素因年龄而异。然而,很少有研究调查乘客的存在如何调节司机年龄与车祸罪责之间的关系。本研究考察了驾驶员年龄与事故罪责之间的关系,重点关注乘客在场的调节作用。方法:本研究分析了爱荷华州交通部2015年至2020年的碰撞数据,重点关注涉及未让路碰撞的驾驶员(N = 36,577)。分析样本仅限于多车碰撞,碰撞报告显示只有一名司机造成了碰撞。建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,以检验驾驶员过失的预测因素,重点关注乘客的存在及其与驾驶员年龄组的相互作用。结果:乘客的存在与司机在未能让步的撞车事故中被指责的可能性降低显著相关,前排乘客对中老年司机群体有显著影响。这种关联在14-44岁的司机中不显著,但在45岁及以上的司机中具有显著性。中年司机(45-64岁)可能开始经历与年龄相关的驾驶能力下降,他们从前排乘客中获益最多。与最年轻的司机(14-24岁)相比,年龄最大的司机(75岁以上)在没有乘客的情况下被判有罪的可能性要高得多,而在有乘客陪同的情况下,他们的概率与最年轻的司机相似。结论:有和没有前座乘客的司机有罪概率有意义的差异,突出了乘客作为安全驾驶的副驾驶的潜力,为制定有效的道路安全干预措施提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信