Geospatial analysis of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and trauma center accessibility in New York State.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nwe Oo Mon, Elisa Szydziak, Gabriela Santos-Revilla, Renee Stolberg, Taleah Angus, Sara Cardozo-Stolberg
{"title":"Geospatial analysis of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and trauma center accessibility in New York State.","authors":"Nwe Oo Mon, Elisa Szydziak, Gabriela Santos-Revilla, Renee Stolberg, Taleah Angus, Sara Cardozo-Stolberg","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2524846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and visualize counties at high risk for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) resulting in injuries, serious injuries, and fatalities in New York State from 2019 to 2023 using geospatial analysis. This study utilizes choropleth and heat maps to highlight crash distribution, overlays trauma center locations to evaluate accessibility and identify coverage gaps, and incorporates principal component analysis and negative binomial regression to explore regional patterns and predictors of severe and fatal crashes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Crash data were obtained from the Crash Location and Engineering Analysis Repository (CLEAR) database (2019-2023) maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). Key metrics include crashes per 10,000 population, and crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Geospatial analyses were conducted using choropleth and heat maps to highlight high-risk regions and evaluate trauma center coverage. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted to explore patterns among county-level crash and access indicators. A negative binomial regression model was used to identify predictors of serious/fatal crash rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serious and fatal crash numbers were concentrated in densely populated urban/suburban counties such as Kings, Suffolk, Queens, Erie, and Nassau, while rural counties like Hamilton, Greene exhibited elevated serious and fatal crash rates per 10,000 population. NYC counties had the highest serious and fatal crash rates per million VMT. Heatmaps revealed counties/areas with insufficient trauma center coverage suggesting potential delays in definitive care. Rural counties had more speed and animal-related crashes. PCA identified distinct rural and urban crash exposure patterns. Negative binomial regression results showed higher serious/fatal crash rates were significantly associated with greater rural population percentage and Health Service Regions outside NYC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Geospatial analysis highlights significant disparities in trauma center accessibility and MVC outcomes across New York State. Rural counties with higher crash severity and fatality rates face challenges due to limited trauma care resources. Enhancing trauma center accessibility in underserved regions and implementing targeted interventions such as road safety improvements, wildlife-related crash prevention measures, and emergency transport enhancements are critical to reducing MVC-related fatalities. These findings provide policymakers with actionable insights to allocate resources efficiently and prioritize trauma care expansion in high-risk areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2524846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify and visualize counties at high risk for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) resulting in injuries, serious injuries, and fatalities in New York State from 2019 to 2023 using geospatial analysis. This study utilizes choropleth and heat maps to highlight crash distribution, overlays trauma center locations to evaluate accessibility and identify coverage gaps, and incorporates principal component analysis and negative binomial regression to explore regional patterns and predictors of severe and fatal crashes.

Methods: Crash data were obtained from the Crash Location and Engineering Analysis Repository (CLEAR) database (2019-2023) maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). Key metrics include crashes per 10,000 population, and crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Geospatial analyses were conducted using choropleth and heat maps to highlight high-risk regions and evaluate trauma center coverage. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted to explore patterns among county-level crash and access indicators. A negative binomial regression model was used to identify predictors of serious/fatal crash rates.

Results: Serious and fatal crash numbers were concentrated in densely populated urban/suburban counties such as Kings, Suffolk, Queens, Erie, and Nassau, while rural counties like Hamilton, Greene exhibited elevated serious and fatal crash rates per 10,000 population. NYC counties had the highest serious and fatal crash rates per million VMT. Heatmaps revealed counties/areas with insufficient trauma center coverage suggesting potential delays in definitive care. Rural counties had more speed and animal-related crashes. PCA identified distinct rural and urban crash exposure patterns. Negative binomial regression results showed higher serious/fatal crash rates were significantly associated with greater rural population percentage and Health Service Regions outside NYC.

Conclusion: Geospatial analysis highlights significant disparities in trauma center accessibility and MVC outcomes across New York State. Rural counties with higher crash severity and fatality rates face challenges due to limited trauma care resources. Enhancing trauma center accessibility in underserved regions and implementing targeted interventions such as road safety improvements, wildlife-related crash prevention measures, and emergency transport enhancements are critical to reducing MVC-related fatalities. These findings provide policymakers with actionable insights to allocate resources efficiently and prioritize trauma care expansion in high-risk areas.

纽约州机动车碰撞与创伤中心可达性的地理空间分析。
目的:利用地理空间分析,识别和可视化2019年至2023年纽约州机动车碰撞(MVCs)导致伤害、重伤和死亡的高风险县。本研究利用人口密度和热图来突出碰撞分布,覆盖创伤中心位置来评估可达性和识别覆盖差距,并结合主成分分析和负二项回归来探索严重和致命碰撞的区域模式和预测因素。方法:碰撞数据来自纽约州交通部(NYSDOT)维护的碰撞定位和工程分析库(CLEAR)数据库(2019-2023)。关键指标包括每1万人发生的车祸,以及每百万汽车行驶里程(VMT)发生的车祸。地理空间分析使用了地形和热图来突出高危区域并评估创伤中心的覆盖范围。采用主成分分析(PCA)探讨县域碰撞与接入指标之间的关系。使用负二项回归模型来确定严重/致命碰撞率的预测因子。结果:严重和致命的事故数量集中在人口稠密的城市/郊区,如国王县、萨福克县、皇后区、伊利县和拿骚县,而像汉密尔顿县、格林县这样的农村县每万人口中严重和致命的事故发生率较高。纽约市各县每百万行驶里程的严重和致命车祸率最高。热图显示创伤中心覆盖率不足的县/地区表明最终护理可能会延迟。农村县有更多的车速和与动物有关的撞车事故。PCA确定了不同的农村和城市碰撞暴露模式。负二项回归结果显示,较高的严重/致命车祸率与较高的农村人口百分比和纽约市以外的卫生服务区域显著相关。结论:地理空间分析突出了纽约州创伤中心可达性和MVC结果的显著差异。由于创伤护理资源有限,事故严重程度和死亡率较高的农村县面临挑战。加强服务不足地区创伤中心的可及性,实施有针对性的干预措施,如改善道路安全、与野生动物有关的事故预防措施和加强紧急运输,对于减少与mvc相关的死亡人数至关重要。这些发现为决策者提供了可操作的见解,以有效分配资源并优先考虑高危地区的创伤护理扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信