Analysis of the possible pathways between social and well-being outcomes: a mixed-method study about community-based sociotherapy for refugees in Nakivale Settlement, Uganda.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tessa Ubels, Sara Kinsbergen, Dirk-Jan Koch, Judith Kanshabe, Jochem Tolsma
{"title":"Analysis of the possible pathways between social and well-being outcomes: a mixed-method study about community-based sociotherapy for refugees in Nakivale Settlement, Uganda.","authors":"Tessa Ubels, Sara Kinsbergen, Dirk-Jan Koch, Judith Kanshabe, Jochem Tolsma","doi":"10.1186/s13031-025-00682-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refugees in Nakivale Settlement, southwestern Uganda, are at risk of suffering from both mental health and social problems due to migration-related stressors. Mental health and psychosocial support is offered to improve their well-being. The theories of change of mental health and psychosocial support interventions often assume that individual and social outcomes are interrelated. By analysing changes in well-being and social support after Community-Based Sociotherapy (CBS), we assess the pathways between these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses a longitudinal mixed-method approach, analysing survey data from 98 CBS participants at three time points, and 11 focus group discussions. We focus on well-being and social support outcomes. We first analysed the quantitative data (paired t-tests, correlations, random-intercept cross-lagged panel model), followed by a qualitative content analysis to interpret the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not find quantitative evidence of within-person influence processes between well-being and social support, and the significantly positive changes in these outcomes between the pre- and posttest declined over time. The qualitative data shed new light on the changes in the lives of the participants after participating in CBS, and the barriers to and facilitators of change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among this group of participants, we found no quantitative and limited qualitative evidence that improvements in well-being led to improved social outcomes, or vice versa. We consider how methodological limitations (i.e. our sample size and limited number of survey items) may have influenced our results, and contextual and temporal explanations for the lack of evidence of pathways. This finding stands in contrast with the theories of change of many mental health and psychosocial support interventions, and therefore calls for consideration of the complex realities of people living in refugee settings, rather than assuming simple pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00682-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refugees in Nakivale Settlement, southwestern Uganda, are at risk of suffering from both mental health and social problems due to migration-related stressors. Mental health and psychosocial support is offered to improve their well-being. The theories of change of mental health and psychosocial support interventions often assume that individual and social outcomes are interrelated. By analysing changes in well-being and social support after Community-Based Sociotherapy (CBS), we assess the pathways between these outcomes.

Methods: This study uses a longitudinal mixed-method approach, analysing survey data from 98 CBS participants at three time points, and 11 focus group discussions. We focus on well-being and social support outcomes. We first analysed the quantitative data (paired t-tests, correlations, random-intercept cross-lagged panel model), followed by a qualitative content analysis to interpret the quantitative findings.

Results: We did not find quantitative evidence of within-person influence processes between well-being and social support, and the significantly positive changes in these outcomes between the pre- and posttest declined over time. The qualitative data shed new light on the changes in the lives of the participants after participating in CBS, and the barriers to and facilitators of change.

Conclusions: Among this group of participants, we found no quantitative and limited qualitative evidence that improvements in well-being led to improved social outcomes, or vice versa. We consider how methodological limitations (i.e. our sample size and limited number of survey items) may have influenced our results, and contextual and temporal explanations for the lack of evidence of pathways. This finding stands in contrast with the theories of change of many mental health and psychosocial support interventions, and therefore calls for consideration of the complex realities of people living in refugee settings, rather than assuming simple pathways.

社会和福祉结果之间可能途径的分析:乌干达Nakivale定居点难民社区社会治疗的混合方法研究。
背景:由于与移徙有关的压力源,乌干达西南部纳基瓦莱定居点的难民面临心理健康和社会问题的风险。提供心理健康和社会心理支持,以改善他们的福祉。心理健康和社会心理支持干预措施的变化理论通常假设个人和社会结果是相互关联的。通过分析社区社会治疗(CBS)后幸福感和社会支持的变化,我们评估了这些结果之间的途径。方法:本研究采用纵向混合方法,分析了98名CBS参与者在三个时间点的调查数据,并进行了11次焦点小组讨论。我们关注福祉和社会支持成果。我们首先分析了定量数据(配对t检验、相关性、随机截距交叉滞后面板模型),然后进行定性内容分析来解释定量结果。结果:我们没有发现幸福感和社会支持之间的个人影响过程的定量证据,并且这些结果在测试前和测试后的显著积极变化随着时间的推移而下降。定性数据揭示了参与CBS后参与者生活的变化,以及变化的障碍和促进因素。结论:在这组参与者中,我们没有发现定量和有限的定性证据表明幸福感的改善会导致社会结果的改善,反之亦然。我们考虑了方法学的局限性(即我们的样本量和有限的调查项目数量)如何影响我们的结果,以及缺乏途径证据的背景和时间解释。这一发现与许多心理健康和社会心理支持干预措施的变化理论形成对比,因此要求考虑生活在难民环境中的人们的复杂现实,而不是假设简单的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信