Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1177/21677026241289927
Karolina M Lempert, Benjamin Huber, Marcelo C Batistuzzo, Karthik Sheshachala, Dianne M Hezel, Niels T de Joode, Clara Marincowitz, Christine Lochner, Dan J Stein, Janardhanan C Narayanaswamy, Odile A van den Heuvel, Melanie Wall, Helen Blair Simpson
{"title":"Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study.","authors":"Karolina M Lempert, Benjamin Huber, Marcelo C Batistuzzo, Karthik Sheshachala, Dianne M Hezel, Niels T de Joode, Clara Marincowitz, Christine Lochner, Dan J Stein, Janardhanan C Narayanaswamy, Odile A van den Heuvel, Melanie Wall, Helen Blair Simpson","doi":"10.1177/21677026241289927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) features maladaptive decision making, previous research examining economic decision making in OCD has yielded inconsistent results. Here we examined whether unmedicated adults with OCD (<i>n</i> = 268) differ from healthy controls (HC; <i>n</i> = 256) on two measures of decision making about potential rewards: 1) delay discounting, the tendency to prefer rewards sooner rather than later, even if the delayed reward is larger, and 2) risk tolerance, the willingness to gamble for uncertain rewards when the risk is known. Data were collected in Brazil, India, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the USA as part of the Global OCD study. After controlling for age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, IQ, and site, individuals with OCD did not differ from HC in either delay discounting or risk tolerance. However, patients with OCD who reported more anxiety and depression showed higher delay discounting, or a relative preference for immediate rewards.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 3","pages":"542-557"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241289927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) features maladaptive decision making, previous research examining economic decision making in OCD has yielded inconsistent results. Here we examined whether unmedicated adults with OCD (n = 268) differ from healthy controls (HC; n = 256) on two measures of decision making about potential rewards: 1) delay discounting, the tendency to prefer rewards sooner rather than later, even if the delayed reward is larger, and 2) risk tolerance, the willingness to gamble for uncertain rewards when the risk is known. Data were collected in Brazil, India, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the USA as part of the Global OCD study. After controlling for age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, IQ, and site, individuals with OCD did not differ from HC in either delay discounting or risk tolerance. However, patients with OCD who reported more anxiety and depression showed higher delay discounting, or a relative preference for immediate rewards.

强迫症的延迟贴现和风险容忍:来自全球强迫症研究的结果。
虽然强迫症(OCD)的特征是决策适应不良,但以往对强迫症患者经济决策的研究结果并不一致。在这里,我们研究了未接受药物治疗的成年强迫症患者(n = 268)与健康对照组(HC;(N = 256)关于潜在回报的两项决策措施:1)延迟贴现,倾向于更早而不是更晚的回报,即使延迟的回报更大;2)风险承受能力,当风险已知时,为不确定的回报赌博的意愿。数据是在巴西、印度、荷兰、南非和美国收集的,作为全球强迫症研究的一部分。在控制了年龄、性别、受教育程度、社会经济地位、智商和地点后,OCD个体在延迟折扣或风险承受能力方面与HC个体没有差异。然而,报告更多焦虑和抑郁的强迫症患者表现出更高的延迟折扣,或者对即时奖励的相对偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信