{"title":"Assessing Tilt and Retrieval Challenges with Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Comparison of Original and Anti-Tilting Models of the ALN Filter.","authors":"Sylvain Grange, Pierre Cixous, Géraldine Poenou, Geoffroy Guillaubey, Elie Ayoub, Claire Boutet, Laurent Bertoletti, Rémi Grange","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the tilt of the classical ALN® inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) with that of the new Optional Anti-Tilting Filter (OATF) in a single-center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed fluoroscopic images from 539 patients who received an IVCF between April 2012 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the frontal view tilt angle of the IVCF within the IVC at insertion between the ALN classical filter (ACF) and the new OATF. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of tilt between these two filters at retrieval, as well as a correlation between tilt and fluoroscopy time. Imaging and clinical data were collected from hospital databases, and statistical analysis was conducted using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At placement, in the frontal plane, median tilt was significantly lower in the OATF group (5° [2°-10°]) than in the ACF group (10° [6°-15°]) (p<0.01). At retrieval, median frontal plane tilt was significantly lower in the OATF group (3.5° [1°-10°]) than in the ACF group (11° [5°-16.5°]) (p<0.01). Median lateral plane tilt at retrieval was also significantly lower in the OATF group (3° [1°-6.5°]) than in the ACF group (8° [4°-13°]) (p < 0.001). At retrieval, front plane tilt was correlated with fluoroscopy time (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.165; n=184) (p=0.033).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings indicate that the OATF is associated with reduced tilt compared to the classical model.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the tilt of the classical ALN® inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) with that of the new Optional Anti-Tilting Filter (OATF) in a single-center retrospective study.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed fluoroscopic images from 539 patients who received an IVCF between April 2012 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the frontal view tilt angle of the IVCF within the IVC at insertion between the ALN classical filter (ACF) and the new OATF. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of tilt between these two filters at retrieval, as well as a correlation between tilt and fluoroscopy time. Imaging and clinical data were collected from hospital databases, and statistical analysis was conducted using regression models.
Results: At placement, in the frontal plane, median tilt was significantly lower in the OATF group (5° [2°-10°]) than in the ACF group (10° [6°-15°]) (p<0.01). At retrieval, median frontal plane tilt was significantly lower in the OATF group (3.5° [1°-10°]) than in the ACF group (11° [5°-16.5°]) (p<0.01). Median lateral plane tilt at retrieval was also significantly lower in the OATF group (3° [1°-6.5°]) than in the ACF group (8° [4°-13°]) (p < 0.001). At retrieval, front plane tilt was correlated with fluoroscopy time (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.165; n=184) (p=0.033).
Discussion: These findings indicate that the OATF is associated with reduced tilt compared to the classical model.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.