Novel Laser System-Assisted CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy in Patients with COPD Combined with Pulmonary Nodules.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chao Li, Xiao Hu, Cheng Li, Gang Jiang, Yong Liang Jiang
{"title":"Novel Laser System-Assisted CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy in Patients with COPD Combined with Pulmonary Nodules.","authors":"Chao Li, Xiao Hu, Cheng Li, Gang Jiang, Yong Liang Jiang","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S530756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The diagnosis and management of pulmonary nodules in patients with COPD are challenging, as these nodules may represent either lung cancer or other pulmonary diseases. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of a novel laser systems (LGS)-assisted CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in COPD patients with pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 60 COPD patients with pulmonary nodules. Thirty patients (n=30) underwent CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy assisted by LGS, while the remaining 30 (n=30) underwent conventional manual CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy. The surgical time, number of punctures, CT scan frequency, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics, lesion size, location, puncture depth, or nodule nature. Compared to the traditional method, LGS-assisted CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy significantly reduced the number of CT scans (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 3.2 ± 0.6, P < 0.001) and the average procedure time (12.6 ± 2.7 min vs 25.1 ± 3.4 min, P < 0.001). Additionally, the total intraoperative time per procedure was significantly reduced (25.1 ± 3.4 min vs 45.9 ± 8.8 min, P < 0.001). With the use of LGS, 73% (22/30) of the procedures hit the target on the first needle insertion, compared to only 6.7% (2/30) in the conventional group. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the traditional method, the use of LGS improved puncture efficiency in COPD patients, reduced the need for needle adjustments, and effectively shortened the procedure time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"2371-2379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S530756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The diagnosis and management of pulmonary nodules in patients with COPD are challenging, as these nodules may represent either lung cancer or other pulmonary diseases. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of a novel laser systems (LGS)-assisted CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in COPD patients with pulmonary nodules.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 60 COPD patients with pulmonary nodules. Thirty patients (n=30) underwent CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy assisted by LGS, while the remaining 30 (n=30) underwent conventional manual CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy. The surgical time, number of punctures, CT scan frequency, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics, lesion size, location, puncture depth, or nodule nature. Compared to the traditional method, LGS-assisted CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy significantly reduced the number of CT scans (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 3.2 ± 0.6, P < 0.001) and the average procedure time (12.6 ± 2.7 min vs 25.1 ± 3.4 min, P < 0.001). Additionally, the total intraoperative time per procedure was significantly reduced (25.1 ± 3.4 min vs 45.9 ± 8.8 min, P < 0.001). With the use of LGS, 73% (22/30) of the procedures hit the target on the first needle insertion, compared to only 6.7% (2/30) in the conventional group. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared to the traditional method, the use of LGS improved puncture efficiency in COPD patients, reduced the need for needle adjustments, and effectively shortened the procedure time.

新型激光系统辅助ct引导下COPD合并肺结节患者经皮经胸肺活检。
目的:慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺结节的诊断和治疗具有挑战性,因为这些结节可能代表肺癌或其他肺部疾病。本研究旨在评估新型激光系统(LGS)辅助ct引导下经皮肺活检在COPD肺结节患者中的效果。方法:回顾性分析60例COPD合并肺结节患者的临床资料。30例(n=30)行LGS辅助下ct引导下经皮经胸肺活检,其余30例(n=30)行常规手工ct引导下经皮经胸肺活检。比较两组手术时间、穿刺次数、CT扫描频次及并发症。结果:两组在临床特征、病变大小、部位、穿刺深度、结节性质等方面均无显著差异。与传统方法相比,lgs辅助CT引导下经皮肺活检术的CT扫描次数(2.3±0.5 vs 3.2±0.6,P < 0.001)和平均手术时间(12.6±2.7 min vs 25.1±3.4 min, P < 0.001)显著减少。此外,每次手术的总术中时间显著减少(25.1±3.4 min vs 45.9±8.8 min, P < 0.001)。使用LGS时,73%(22/30)的手术在第一次针头插入时达到目标,而传统组只有6.7%(2/30)。此外,两组的并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:与传统方法相比,LGS的使用提高了COPD患者的穿刺效率,减少了调整针头的需要,有效缩短了手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信