Longitudinal changes in income are associated with the healthiness and sustainability of foods purchased in Mexican households.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Carolina Batis, Analí Castellanos-Gutiérrez, M Arantxa Colchero, Juan A Rivera
{"title":"Longitudinal changes in income are associated with the healthiness and sustainability of foods purchased in Mexican households.","authors":"Carolina Batis, Analí Castellanos-Gutiérrez, M Arantxa Colchero, Juan A Rivera","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025100700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the within-households association between change in income over time and food purchases in a national panel of households. The need to shift towards healthy and sustainable diets is widely recognized, thus the importance of identifying the factors that influence food purchase decisions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal observational study; for each of the 33 food items queried, we ran a conditional logistic fixed-effect regression model to evaluate the association between change in income per-capita and food purchases (yes/no) during the past week, adjusted by covariates.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Mexican Family Life Survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>6,008 households that participated in the survey for at least two of the three available waves of study (2002, 2005, and 2009).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within-households, the odds ratio (95% CI) of purchasing the food in the past week for an increase in 1 SD of income was 1.09 (1.02, 1.16) for rarer fruits (other than bananas, apples, and oranges); 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) for beef; 1.06 (1.00, 1.13) for canned tuna/sardines; 1.09 (1.02, 1.18) for fish/shellfish; 1.08 (1.02, 1.16) for discretionary packaged products, and 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) for soft drinks. There were some differences by urban/rural area or SES; mainly, those with lower SES had increased odds of purchasing the food item in more cases (10 out of 33 food items).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>households' income growth can have mixed effects on the healthiness and sustainability of food purchases. Public policies to improve the food environment and nutrition education are necessary to enhance the positive and counteract the negative effect of income.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the within-households association between change in income over time and food purchases in a national panel of households. The need to shift towards healthy and sustainable diets is widely recognized, thus the importance of identifying the factors that influence food purchase decisions.

Design: Longitudinal observational study; for each of the 33 food items queried, we ran a conditional logistic fixed-effect regression model to evaluate the association between change in income per-capita and food purchases (yes/no) during the past week, adjusted by covariates.

Setting: Mexican Family Life Survey.

Participants: 6,008 households that participated in the survey for at least two of the three available waves of study (2002, 2005, and 2009).

Results: Within-households, the odds ratio (95% CI) of purchasing the food in the past week for an increase in 1 SD of income was 1.09 (1.02, 1.16) for rarer fruits (other than bananas, apples, and oranges); 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) for beef; 1.06 (1.00, 1.13) for canned tuna/sardines; 1.09 (1.02, 1.18) for fish/shellfish; 1.08 (1.02, 1.16) for discretionary packaged products, and 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) for soft drinks. There were some differences by urban/rural area or SES; mainly, those with lower SES had increased odds of purchasing the food item in more cases (10 out of 33 food items).

Conclusions: households' income growth can have mixed effects on the healthiness and sustainability of food purchases. Public policies to improve the food environment and nutrition education are necessary to enhance the positive and counteract the negative effect of income.

收入的纵向变化与墨西哥家庭购买的食品的健康和可持续性有关。
目的:在全国家庭面板中估计家庭内部收入随时间变化与食品购买之间的关系。人们普遍认识到需要转向健康和可持续的饮食,因此确定影响食品购买决定的因素非常重要。设计:纵向观察研究;对于所查询的33种食品中的每一种,我们运行了一个条件逻辑固定效应回归模型,以评估过去一周内人均收入变化与食品购买(是/否)之间的关联,并通过协变量进行调整。背景:墨西哥家庭生活调查。参与者:6,008个家庭参与了至少两次的调查(2002年,2005年和2009年)。结果:在家庭内部,对于稀有水果(除香蕉、苹果和橙子外),在过去一周内购买食物以增加1 SD收入的比值比(95% CI)为1.09 (1.02,1.16);牛肉为1.11 (1.04,1.18);金枪鱼/沙丁鱼罐头1.06 (1.00,1.13);鱼类/贝类1.09 (1.02,1.18);1.08(1.02, 1.16)为可自由支配的包装产品,1.15(1.08,1.23)为软饮料。城乡或社会经济地位存在一定差异;主要是,那些社会经济地位较低的人在更多情况下(33种食物中的10种)购买这种食物的几率更高。结论:家庭收入增长可能对食品购买的健康和可持续性产生混合影响。改善食品环境和营养教育的公共政策对于增强和抵消收入的消极影响是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信