Defining Family-Centered Cancer Care: A Group Concept Mapping Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Karla T Washington, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Todd D Becker, Keisha White Makinde, Jacquelyn J Benson, Alyssa Knight, Jessica Vanderlan, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver
{"title":"Defining Family-Centered Cancer Care: A Group Concept Mapping Study.","authors":"Karla T Washington, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Todd D Becker, Keisha White Makinde, Jacquelyn J Benson, Alyssa Knight, Jessica Vanderlan, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver","doi":"10.1002/pon.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family-centered cancer care is widely recognized as important, but the absence of an actionable definition limits its consistent implementation in clinical settings. Moreover, efforts to define this concept have often excluded diverse perspectives, potentially exacerbating existing disparities.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Researchers sought to engage diverse groups of family members of individuals with cancer to define key components of family-centered cancer care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this sequential mixed-methods group concept mapping study, researchers purposefully sampled biological, legal, and chosen family members of individuals with cancer to remotely brainstorm, rate, and sort responses to the following prompt: \"A specific thing cancer centers can do to support patients' families is _________.\" Participants based their ratings on prompt responses' perceived importance and truth in their care experiences. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis generated point and cluster maps illustrating relationships among responses, while descriptive statistics of response ratings identified strengths and opportunities in the provision of family-centered care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 121 family members, predominantly spouses/partners (53%) and adult children (22%). Over half (62%) were female, and their mean age was approximately 55 years. Participants grouped 86 responses into five clusters: Facility Characteristics, Financial Assistance, Family Support, Clinical Operations, and Family Education. On average, participants endorsed all (100%) of the responses as important and recognized most (78%) as true in their own care experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family members acknowledged the importance and receipt of family-centered cancer care but also identified opportunities for improvement. Addressing these opportunities would strengthen family support, ultimately benefitting both patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family-centered cancer care is widely recognized as important, but the absence of an actionable definition limits its consistent implementation in clinical settings. Moreover, efforts to define this concept have often excluded diverse perspectives, potentially exacerbating existing disparities.

Aims: Researchers sought to engage diverse groups of family members of individuals with cancer to define key components of family-centered cancer care.

Methods: In this sequential mixed-methods group concept mapping study, researchers purposefully sampled biological, legal, and chosen family members of individuals with cancer to remotely brainstorm, rate, and sort responses to the following prompt: "A specific thing cancer centers can do to support patients' families is _________." Participants based their ratings on prompt responses' perceived importance and truth in their care experiences. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis generated point and cluster maps illustrating relationships among responses, while descriptive statistics of response ratings identified strengths and opportunities in the provision of family-centered care.

Results: Participants included 121 family members, predominantly spouses/partners (53%) and adult children (22%). Over half (62%) were female, and their mean age was approximately 55 years. Participants grouped 86 responses into five clusters: Facility Characteristics, Financial Assistance, Family Support, Clinical Operations, and Family Education. On average, participants endorsed all (100%) of the responses as important and recognized most (78%) as true in their own care experiences.

Conclusions: Family members acknowledged the importance and receipt of family-centered cancer care but also identified opportunities for improvement. Addressing these opportunities would strengthen family support, ultimately benefitting both patients and families.

定义以家庭为中心的癌症治疗:一项群体概念映射研究。
背景:以家庭为中心的癌症护理被广泛认为是重要的,但缺乏可操作的定义限制了其在临床环境中的一致实施。此外,界定这一概念的努力往往排除了不同的观点,从而可能加剧现有的差距。目的:研究人员试图让癌症患者的不同家庭成员群体参与进来,以确定以家庭为中心的癌症护理的关键组成部分。方法:在这个连续的混合方法群体概念图研究中,研究人员有目的地对癌症患者的生物学、法律和选定的家庭成员进行抽样,对以下提示进行远程头脑风暴、评估和排序:“癌症中心可以做的一件事来支持患者的家庭是_________。”参与者的评分是基于即时回答对他们的护理经历的重要性和真实性的感知。多维尺度和分层聚类分析生成了点和聚类图,说明了反应之间的关系,而反应评级的描述性统计则确定了提供以家庭为中心的护理的优势和机会。结果:参与者包括121名家庭成员,主要是配偶/伴侣(53%)和成年子女(22%)。超过一半(62%)是女性,她们的平均年龄约为55岁。参与者将86份回答分为五类:设施特征、财政援助、家庭支持、临床操作和家庭教育。平均而言,参与者认为所有(100%)的回答都很重要,并且认为大多数(78%)的回答在他们自己的护理经历中是正确的。结论:家庭成员承认以家庭为中心的癌症治疗的重要性和接受度,但也确定了改进的机会。抓住这些机会将加强家庭支持,最终使患者和家庭都受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信