IVPT Data Challenges in the Real World: Outliers, Anomalous and Aberrant Data: Examples.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Paul A Lehman
{"title":"IVPT Data Challenges in the Real World: Outliers, Anomalous and Aberrant Data: Examples.","authors":"Paul A Lehman","doi":"10.1007/s11095-025-03893-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The in vitro permeation test (IVPT) is a sensitive and robust model system that has been vital in elucidating the fundamental parameters surrounding the absorption of both therapeutic agents and industrial chemicals through skin. Unlike most clinical bioequivalence study designs, the IVPT method allows for the evaluation of multiple replicates (skin sections) from the same donor (\"subject\") at the same time. Though this should provide an advantage for a better characterization of the topical permeation kinetics within a donor, it also comes with the likelihood that any given skin replicate within the same donor, may demonstrate an unusual or anomalous absorption profile. These are often described as 'outliers', those sections demonstrating a substantial difference in percutaneous absorption kinetics to the other replicates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data from the authors' archives has been screened with the objective of finding and addressing a number of questions regarding skin section and donor data outliers, anomalous data, missing data and the establishment of a representative J<sub>max</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the IVPT method has been properly designed and performed, outliers reflect anomalies in the donor's skin and donor population rather than as an artifact of the IVPT method. Identification and statistical confirmation approaches help to differentiate anomalous data from the core data set. In addition, missing data, and determining a representative J<sub>max</sub>, confound the accurate determination of BE for topical formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-025-03893-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The in vitro permeation test (IVPT) is a sensitive and robust model system that has been vital in elucidating the fundamental parameters surrounding the absorption of both therapeutic agents and industrial chemicals through skin. Unlike most clinical bioequivalence study designs, the IVPT method allows for the evaluation of multiple replicates (skin sections) from the same donor ("subject") at the same time. Though this should provide an advantage for a better characterization of the topical permeation kinetics within a donor, it also comes with the likelihood that any given skin replicate within the same donor, may demonstrate an unusual or anomalous absorption profile. These are often described as 'outliers', those sections demonstrating a substantial difference in percutaneous absorption kinetics to the other replicates.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from the authors' archives has been screened with the objective of finding and addressing a number of questions regarding skin section and donor data outliers, anomalous data, missing data and the establishment of a representative Jmax.

Conclusion: When the IVPT method has been properly designed and performed, outliers reflect anomalies in the donor's skin and donor population rather than as an artifact of the IVPT method. Identification and statistical confirmation approaches help to differentiate anomalous data from the core data set. In addition, missing data, and determining a representative Jmax, confound the accurate determination of BE for topical formulations.

现实世界中的IVPT数据挑战:异常值,异常和异常数据:示例。
背景:体外渗透试验(IVPT)是一种敏感而稳健的模型系统,在阐明治疗药物和工业化学品通过皮肤吸收的基本参数方面至关重要。与大多数临床生物等效性研究设计不同,IVPT方法允许同时评估来自同一供体(“受试者”)的多个重复(皮肤切片)。虽然这应该为更好地表征供体内局部渗透动力学提供优势,但它也有可能在同一供体内复制任何给定的皮肤,可能表现出不寻常或异常的吸收特征。这些通常被描述为“异常值”,这些切片显示出与其他重复的经皮吸收动力学的实质性差异。方法:对来自作者档案的数据进行回顾性分析,目的是发现和解决有关皮肤切片和供体数据异常值、异常数据、缺失数据和建立具有代表性的Jmax的一些问题。结论:当IVPT方法被正确设计和执行时,异常值反映了供体皮肤和供体群体的异常,而不是作为IVPT方法的人工产物。识别和统计确认方法有助于从核心数据集中区分异常数据。此外,缺少数据和确定具有代表性的Jmax,混淆了局部配方BE的准确测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信