Validity and reliability of Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in a Southeastern European population.

IF 2.5 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2525359
Joana Mihani, Genc Burazeri, Emanuela Dyrmishi, Xheladin Draçini, Rebecca Todd, Robert Horne, Suela Këlliçi
{"title":"Validity and reliability of Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in a Southeastern European population.","authors":"Joana Mihani, Genc Burazeri, Emanuela Dyrmishi, Xheladin Draçini, Rebecca Todd, Robert Horne, Suela Këlliçi","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2525359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication adherence improves health outcomes and overall well-being. Questionnaires and reporting scales remain the most accessible and cost-effective assessment tools for adherence; however, they must demonstrate validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in the adult population of Albania and to examine the correlations between the adjusted summary scores of MARS-5 and the sociodemographic and health status characteristics of the study population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Albania during November-December 2024, including a sample of 256 individuals ≥18 years with hypertension, diabetes, or both conditions. The Albanian version of MARS-5 translated, according to guidelines, was administered twice (over two weeks) in-person to patients visiting primary health care settings (≈56% females; response: ≈85%). Participants also reported on sociodemographic factors and health status characteristics. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency and Pearson's correlation coefficient for the assessment of test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the test and 0.91 for the retest. Test-retest reliability was high (r = 0.95, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Above median scores of adherence (adjusted summary score: > 4) were positively associated with urban residence, higher educational attainment, a higher income level, and periodic medical check-ups, but inversely related to duration of hypertension, number of medications for hypertension, overall number of medications, number of times per day using medications, and the total number of daily doses of medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MARS-5 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing medication adherence in the adult population of Albania.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2525359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2525359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication adherence improves health outcomes and overall well-being. Questionnaires and reporting scales remain the most accessible and cost-effective assessment tools for adherence; however, they must demonstrate validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in the adult population of Albania and to examine the correlations between the adjusted summary scores of MARS-5 and the sociodemographic and health status characteristics of the study population.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Albania during November-December 2024, including a sample of 256 individuals ≥18 years with hypertension, diabetes, or both conditions. The Albanian version of MARS-5 translated, according to guidelines, was administered twice (over two weeks) in-person to patients visiting primary health care settings (≈56% females; response: ≈85%). Participants also reported on sociodemographic factors and health status characteristics. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency and Pearson's correlation coefficient for the assessment of test-retest reliability.

Results: Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the test and 0.91 for the retest. Test-retest reliability was high (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). Above median scores of adherence (adjusted summary score: > 4) were positively associated with urban residence, higher educational attainment, a higher income level, and periodic medical check-ups, but inversely related to duration of hypertension, number of medications for hypertension, overall number of medications, number of times per day using medications, and the total number of daily doses of medications.

Conclusion: MARS-5 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing medication adherence in the adult population of Albania.

用药依从性报告量表(MARS-5)在东南欧人群中的效度和信度
背景:药物依从性改善健康结果和整体幸福感。调查问卷和报告量表仍然是最容易获得和最具成本效益的依从性评估工具;然而,它们必须证明有效性、可靠性和对变化的敏感性。本研究的目的是评估阿尔巴尼亚成人用药依从性报告量表(MARS-5)的效度和可靠性,并检验MARS-5调整后的总得分与研究人群的社会人口学和健康状况特征之间的相关性。方法:2024年11月至12月在阿尔巴尼亚进行了一项横断面研究,包括256名≥18岁的高血压、糖尿病或两种疾病患者。根据指南翻译的阿尔巴尼亚语版MARS-5,对访问初级卫生保健机构的患者进行两次(超过两周)亲自管理(≈56%为女性;回应:≈85%)。参与者还报告了社会人口因素和健康状况特征。采用Cronbach’s alpha测量内部一致性,Pearson’s相关系数评估重测信度。结果:检验的Cronbach’s alpha为0.89,复验的Cronbach’s alpha为0.91。重测信度高(r = 0.95, P = 4)与居住城市、受教育程度高、收入水平高、定期体检呈正相关,与高血压病程、高血压用药次数、总用药次数、每日用药次数、每日用药总剂量呈负相关。结论:MARS-5是评估阿尔巴尼亚成人药物依从性的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信