A retrospective study on prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of transcribing error: analysis of data from the National Medication Error Reporting System in Malaysia.

IF 2.5 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2528244
Norazida Ab Rahman, Ee Vien Low, Fateha Kamaruddin, Asilah Che Ayub, Sue Chin Chong, Noridayu Tumiran, Norafidah Idris
{"title":"A retrospective study on prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of transcribing error: analysis of data from the National Medication Error Reporting System in Malaysia.","authors":"Norazida Ab Rahman, Ee Vien Low, Fateha Kamaruddin, Asilah Che Ayub, Sue Chin Chong, Noridayu Tumiran, Norafidah Idris","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2528244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication errors (MEs) represent avoidable harm that occurs within the healthcare system. While most MEs do not pose significant safety threats, some can result in severe harm, disability, or even death for patients. We aimed to describe the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of MEs due to transcribing errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of data from the Medication Error Reporting System (MERS) in Malaysia. All ME reports submitted to MERS were verified and classified by trained pharmacists from the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Transcribing errors were identified from all ME reports submitted to MERS that were classified as 'data entry error'. All data from public health facilities (hospitals and clinics) submitted in 2018-2022 were included in the analysis. Descriptive analyses were conducted on frequencies and characteristics of the transcribing errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2018 to December 2022, 265,194 MEs were reported to the MERS, of which 12,049 (4.5%) were transcribing errors. The large proportion of transcribing error was related to dose error, i.e. incorrect dose (48.6%) and incorrect frequency (19.9%), followed by drug error (incorrect drug, 13.3% and incorrect patient, 6.3%). The majority of the errors do not reach patients (94.8%). The most possible error causes and contributing factors were work and environment followed by staff factors, task and technology, and medication-related.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an increase in voluntary reporting over the years, reflecting a growing culture of reporting among healthcare professionals. These findings offer valuable insights into medication errors caused by transcribing processes in Malaysia, which can inform efforts to improve pharmacy practices, design appropriate interventions, and reduce harm to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2528244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2528244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication errors (MEs) represent avoidable harm that occurs within the healthcare system. While most MEs do not pose significant safety threats, some can result in severe harm, disability, or even death for patients. We aimed to describe the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of MEs due to transcribing errors.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the Medication Error Reporting System (MERS) in Malaysia. All ME reports submitted to MERS were verified and classified by trained pharmacists from the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Transcribing errors were identified from all ME reports submitted to MERS that were classified as 'data entry error'. All data from public health facilities (hospitals and clinics) submitted in 2018-2022 were included in the analysis. Descriptive analyses were conducted on frequencies and characteristics of the transcribing errors.

Results: From January 2018 to December 2022, 265,194 MEs were reported to the MERS, of which 12,049 (4.5%) were transcribing errors. The large proportion of transcribing error was related to dose error, i.e. incorrect dose (48.6%) and incorrect frequency (19.9%), followed by drug error (incorrect drug, 13.3% and incorrect patient, 6.3%). The majority of the errors do not reach patients (94.8%). The most possible error causes and contributing factors were work and environment followed by staff factors, task and technology, and medication-related.

Conclusion: There was an increase in voluntary reporting over the years, reflecting a growing culture of reporting among healthcare professionals. These findings offer valuable insights into medication errors caused by transcribing processes in Malaysia, which can inform efforts to improve pharmacy practices, design appropriate interventions, and reduce harm to patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对抄写错误的流行、特征和结果的回顾性研究:对马来西亚国家用药错误报告系统数据的分析。
背景:用药错误(MEs)是发生在医疗保健系统内可避免的伤害。虽然大多数MEs不会构成重大的安全威胁,但有些可能会对患者造成严重伤害、残疾甚至死亡。我们的目的是描述由转录错误引起的MEs的患病率、特征和结果。方法:回顾性分析马来西亚用药差错报告系统(MERS)的数据。提交给中东呼吸综合征的所有ME报告均由马来西亚卫生部训练有素的药剂师进行核实和分类。从提交给中东呼吸综合征的所有ME报告中确定了转录错误,这些报告被归类为“数据输入错误”。2018-2022年提交的公共卫生设施(医院和诊所)的所有数据都纳入了分析。对抄写错误的频率和特征进行了描述性分析。结果:2018年1月至2022年12月,MERS共报告MEs 265194例,其中转录错误12049例(4.5%)。抄写错误所占比例较大的与剂量错误有关,剂量错误占48.6%,频率错误占19.9%,其次是药物错误,药物错误占13.3%,患者错误占6.3%。大多数错误没有到达患者(94.8%)。最可能的错误原因和影响因素是工作和环境,其次是员工因素、任务和技术以及药物相关因素。结论:近年来,自愿报告的人数有所增加,反映了医疗保健专业人员报告文化的不断发展。这些发现为了解马来西亚转录过程造成的用药错误提供了有价值的见解,可以为改进药房实践、设计适当的干预措施和减少对患者的伤害提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信