The Use of a Ward Round Teaching Tool in a Paediatric Oncology Department

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Trisha A. Soosay Raj, Natacha Omer, Amy Z. Gray
{"title":"The Use of a Ward Round Teaching Tool in a Paediatric Oncology Department","authors":"Trisha A. Soosay Raj,&nbsp;Natacha Omer,&nbsp;Amy Z. Gray","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Despite ward rounds being fundamental to hospital-based clinical training, the reported educational value is low. Especially in busy environments, missed learning opportunities occur due to implicit learning, time barriers, and lack of ward round structure. The STIC framework (<i>S</i>et, <i>T</i>arget, <i>I</i>nspect, <i>Close</i>) provides a learner-centred, structured approach to ward round teaching, aimed to enhance education within limited timeframes. We aimed to investigate how the introduction of the STIC framework impacts on learner-centred teaching within a tertiary Paediatric Oncology department.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate framework implementation, with two participant groups comprising 16 junior and senior doctors over 3 months. Surveys were used to document junior staff experience on rounds pre- and post-implementation, with focus groups and interviews used for all participants to explore satisfaction and attitudes to the tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Learner satisfaction improved across all domains of the framework, specifically opportunities for leading clinical encounters and learning on consultant-led rounds. Despite consultants reporting lack of uptake, trainees reported improved teaching. Consultant beliefs and enthusiasm had a strong impact on trainee satisfaction. Trainees placed a high value on active participation and autonomy for their learning. Factors distinct to teaching were reported to affect learner satisfaction, such as planning, time management, and departmental culture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We demonstrate enhanced teaching despite poor perceived uptake, demonstrating the potential of the STIC framework with further implementation. Our study also highlights that in addition to a specific teaching focus, consultant engagement and a safe clinical learning environment are crucial for learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"61 10","pages":"1582-1588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpc.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.70155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Despite ward rounds being fundamental to hospital-based clinical training, the reported educational value is low. Especially in busy environments, missed learning opportunities occur due to implicit learning, time barriers, and lack of ward round structure. The STIC framework (Set, Target, Inspect, Close) provides a learner-centred, structured approach to ward round teaching, aimed to enhance education within limited timeframes. We aimed to investigate how the introduction of the STIC framework impacts on learner-centred teaching within a tertiary Paediatric Oncology department.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate framework implementation, with two participant groups comprising 16 junior and senior doctors over 3 months. Surveys were used to document junior staff experience on rounds pre- and post-implementation, with focus groups and interviews used for all participants to explore satisfaction and attitudes to the tool.

Results

Learner satisfaction improved across all domains of the framework, specifically opportunities for leading clinical encounters and learning on consultant-led rounds. Despite consultants reporting lack of uptake, trainees reported improved teaching. Consultant beliefs and enthusiasm had a strong impact on trainee satisfaction. Trainees placed a high value on active participation and autonomy for their learning. Factors distinct to teaching were reported to affect learner satisfaction, such as planning, time management, and departmental culture.

Conclusions

We demonstrate enhanced teaching despite poor perceived uptake, demonstrating the potential of the STIC framework with further implementation. Our study also highlights that in addition to a specific teaching focus, consultant engagement and a safe clinical learning environment are crucial for learning.

Abstract Image

儿科肿瘤科查房教学工具的应用。
目的:尽管查房是医院临床培训的基础,但报告的教育价值很低。特别是在繁忙的环境中,由于内隐学习、时间障碍和缺乏轮流结构,会导致错失学习机会。STIC框架(设置,目标,检查,关闭)提供了一种以学习者为中心的结构化教学方法,旨在在有限的时间内提高教育水平。我们的目的是调查STIC框架的引入对第三儿科肿瘤科以学习者为中心的教学的影响。方法:采用混合方法评估框架的实施情况,两组参与者包括16名初级和高级医生,时间超过3个月。调查用于记录初级工作人员在实施前后各轮的经验,并对所有参与者进行焦点小组和访谈,以探讨对该工具的满意度和态度。结果:学习者的满意度在框架的所有领域都得到了提高,特别是在领导临床接触和顾问领导的轮次学习的机会。尽管咨询师报告缺乏吸收,受训者报告教学有所改善。咨询师的信念和热情对学员满意度有很大的影响。学员们非常重视积极参与和自主学习。据报道,与教学不同的因素会影响学习者的满意度,如计划、时间管理和部门文化。结论:我们证明了教学效果的提高,尽管人们对这种方法的理解很差,这表明了STIC框架在进一步实施中的潜力。我们的研究还强调,除了特定的教学重点外,咨询师的参与和安全的临床学习环境对学习至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信