Attachment Anxiety, Avoidance, and Disorganization: Latent Profiles of Attachment and Their Associations With Hypomentalization, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidality.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Marcin M Sekowski, Małgorzata Gambin
{"title":"Attachment Anxiety, Avoidance, and Disorganization: Latent Profiles of Attachment and Their Associations With Hypomentalization, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidality.","authors":"Marcin M Sekowski, Małgorzata Gambin","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disorganized attachment is an important concept in contemporary attachment theory, where it plays a significant role in understanding vulnerability to distress and psychopathology. Although latent class analysis of attachment has been conducted several times, disorganization has not been included in them as a dimension of attachment alongside anxiety and avoidance. The study aimed to: identify latent profiles of attachment, including attachment disorganization; and examine differences between attachment profiles in levels of mentalization difficulties, depressive symptoms and suicidality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Polish adults (N = 498) completed two scales measuring adult attachment (a shortened version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised and the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale) and the measures of hypomentalization, depressive symptoms, and suicidality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analysis of attachment scales revealed three factors: anxiety, avoidance, and disorganization. Latent Profile Analysis identified four attachment profiles: \"generalized insecure\" (high anxiety, avoidance, and disorganization; 7.8% of the sample); \"secure\" (low attachment factors scores; 53.6%); \"anxious with disorganized features\" (high anxiety, moderate disorganization, low avoidance; 28.1%); and \"avoidant\" (high avoidance, low anxiety, low disorganization; 10.4%). Generalized insecure and anxious profiles had higher levels of hypomentalization compared to secure and avoidant profiles. Generalized insecure profile had higher levels of depressive symptoms than all other groups and a higher level of suicidality than the secure group. The secure group reported lower depression and suicidality than the anxious group, which in turn had higher suicidality than the avoidant group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results seem to be a step towards integrating dimensional and categorical, as well as personality-social and developmental-clinical approaches in research on attachment in adulthood. The study underscores the significance of more thoroughly integrating disorganized attachment into the broader framework of attachment research, emphasizing its implications for the comprehension and perhaps also the treatment of psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Disorganized attachment is an important concept in contemporary attachment theory, where it plays a significant role in understanding vulnerability to distress and psychopathology. Although latent class analysis of attachment has been conducted several times, disorganization has not been included in them as a dimension of attachment alongside anxiety and avoidance. The study aimed to: identify latent profiles of attachment, including attachment disorganization; and examine differences between attachment profiles in levels of mentalization difficulties, depressive symptoms and suicidality.

Methods: Polish adults (N = 498) completed two scales measuring adult attachment (a shortened version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised and the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale) and the measures of hypomentalization, depressive symptoms, and suicidality.

Results: Factor analysis of attachment scales revealed three factors: anxiety, avoidance, and disorganization. Latent Profile Analysis identified four attachment profiles: "generalized insecure" (high anxiety, avoidance, and disorganization; 7.8% of the sample); "secure" (low attachment factors scores; 53.6%); "anxious with disorganized features" (high anxiety, moderate disorganization, low avoidance; 28.1%); and "avoidant" (high avoidance, low anxiety, low disorganization; 10.4%). Generalized insecure and anxious profiles had higher levels of hypomentalization compared to secure and avoidant profiles. Generalized insecure profile had higher levels of depressive symptoms than all other groups and a higher level of suicidality than the secure group. The secure group reported lower depression and suicidality than the anxious group, which in turn had higher suicidality than the avoidant group.

Conclusion: Our results seem to be a step towards integrating dimensional and categorical, as well as personality-social and developmental-clinical approaches in research on attachment in adulthood. The study underscores the significance of more thoroughly integrating disorganized attachment into the broader framework of attachment research, emphasizing its implications for the comprehension and perhaps also the treatment of psychopathology.

依恋焦虑、回避和混乱:依恋的潜在特征及其与精神状态低下、抑郁症状和自杀的关联。
目的:无组织依恋是当代依恋理论中的一个重要概念,它在理解痛苦脆弱性和心理病理方面起着重要作用。虽然依恋的潜在类别分析已经进行了几次,但混乱并没有被包括在焦虑和回避的依恋维度中。本研究旨在:识别依恋的潜在特征,包括依恋解体;并检查依恋档案在精神化困难、抑郁症状和自杀倾向水平上的差异。方法:波兰成人(N = 498)完成了两份成人依恋量表(缩短版亲密关系体验-修订版和成人无组织依恋量表)和低精神化、抑郁症状和自杀倾向的测量。结果:依恋量表因子分析显示焦虑、回避和无序三个因素。潜在特征分析确定了四种依恋特征:“普遍不安全”(高度焦虑、回避和混乱;7.8%的样本);“安全型”(依恋因子得分低;53.6%);“有混乱特征的焦虑”(高度焦虑,中度混乱,低回避;28.1%);“回避型”(高度回避,低焦虑,低混乱;10.4%)。与安全和回避型人格相比,广义不安全和焦虑型人格具有更高的低自我化水平。普遍不安全概况的抑郁症状水平高于所有其他组,自杀水平高于安全组。安全组的抑郁和自杀倾向低于焦虑组,而焦虑组的自杀倾向又高于逃避组。结论:我们的研究结果似乎朝着整合维度和分类,以及人格-社会和发展-临床方法研究成年依恋迈出了一步。该研究强调了将无组织依恋更彻底地整合到更广泛的依恋研究框架中的重要性,强调了其对精神病理学的理解和治疗的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信