Alexander Tashevski , Mathew R. Varidel , Ian B. Hickie , Jan Scott , Jacob J. Crouse , Caroline Hunt , Maree Abbott , Frank Iorfino
{"title":"Towards improved specificity in mental health syndromes: projection-based clustering of depressive phenotypes","authors":"Alexander Tashevski , Mathew R. Varidel , Ian B. Hickie , Jan Scott , Jacob J. Crouse , Caroline Hunt , Maree Abbott , Frank Iorfino","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Quantitative attempts to improve syndrome specificity typically produce large heterogenous subgroupings, impacting the validity of treatment and research targets. Assessing barriers to the valid application of existing methods and examining improvements from an interpretable projection-based clustering alternative may improve the precision and reproducibility of our research targets and classification systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This exploratory, cross-sectional, study recruited 2820 participants aged 12-to-25 years, from primary-healthcare services in Australia, between November 2018 and July 2023. 1843 participants completed relevant self-reported measures of depression, anxiety and mania-like experiences, and were included for analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to examine the distribution of within-syndrome variance. Projection-based subtypes were compared to traditional quantitative phenotyping approaches: clustering paradigms (Model-Based, Centre-Based Partition, Hierarchical), LCA, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (FA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Interpretable projection-based clustering improved homogeneity and qualitative distinctions between clusters were compared to all other methods. This identified 14 clusters organisable into six novel symptom profiles: sleep (n = 117; 11 %), mania (n = 125; 12 %), anxiety (n = 119; 11 %), weight/appetite gain (n = 138; 13 %), weight/appetite loss (n = 242; 23 %), and an undifferentiated type (n = 310; 29 %). The PCA identified a skewed power-law distribution underlying symptom variance, affecting standard LCA/clustering procedures. This interacted with optimisation algorithms, producing heterogenous subtypes. Within FA, it produced the nested hierarchical structure identified in HiTOP studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A skewed variance distribution underlying the depressive syndrome adversely impacts standard Clustering/LCA methods, and may contribute to past difficulties in identifying well-specified data-driven phenotypes. Consequently, future studies should consider the distribution's impact to their optimisation algorithms or use the better-specified projection-based clustering. Identified profiles reflect major trends in depressive symptom expression, potentially representing improved research targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 119912"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725013540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Quantitative attempts to improve syndrome specificity typically produce large heterogenous subgroupings, impacting the validity of treatment and research targets. Assessing barriers to the valid application of existing methods and examining improvements from an interpretable projection-based clustering alternative may improve the precision and reproducibility of our research targets and classification systems.
Methods
This exploratory, cross-sectional, study recruited 2820 participants aged 12-to-25 years, from primary-healthcare services in Australia, between November 2018 and July 2023. 1843 participants completed relevant self-reported measures of depression, anxiety and mania-like experiences, and were included for analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to examine the distribution of within-syndrome variance. Projection-based subtypes were compared to traditional quantitative phenotyping approaches: clustering paradigms (Model-Based, Centre-Based Partition, Hierarchical), LCA, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (FA).
Results
Interpretable projection-based clustering improved homogeneity and qualitative distinctions between clusters were compared to all other methods. This identified 14 clusters organisable into six novel symptom profiles: sleep (n = 117; 11 %), mania (n = 125; 12 %), anxiety (n = 119; 11 %), weight/appetite gain (n = 138; 13 %), weight/appetite loss (n = 242; 23 %), and an undifferentiated type (n = 310; 29 %). The PCA identified a skewed power-law distribution underlying symptom variance, affecting standard LCA/clustering procedures. This interacted with optimisation algorithms, producing heterogenous subtypes. Within FA, it produced the nested hierarchical structure identified in HiTOP studies.
Conclusions
A skewed variance distribution underlying the depressive syndrome adversely impacts standard Clustering/LCA methods, and may contribute to past difficulties in identifying well-specified data-driven phenotypes. Consequently, future studies should consider the distribution's impact to their optimisation algorithms or use the better-specified projection-based clustering. Identified profiles reflect major trends in depressive symptom expression, potentially representing improved research targets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.