The role of emotional dysregulation and attachment style as indicators of obsessive compulsive symptom-severity.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicole Moriarty, Keith Gaynor, Elif Beyza Koş Yalvaç, Mujgan Inozu
{"title":"The role of emotional dysregulation and attachment style as indicators of obsessive compulsive symptom-severity.","authors":"Nicole Moriarty, Keith Gaynor, Elif Beyza Koş Yalvaç, Mujgan Inozu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing research has demonstrated an association between obsessive compulsive (OCD) and emotional dysregulation. Additionally, evidence suggests a relationship between OCD and attachment style. The current study (1) investigated if a model made up of emotional dysregulation and related constructs of emotion regulation skills, attachment styles and interpersonal emotion regulation predicted obsessive compulsive symptom severity, and (2) investigated the mediating role of emotional dysregulation between attachment style and OCD in a community sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-six participants reported obsessive compulsive symptoms were recruited online and anonymously completed 6 questionnaires. The model was tested through hierarchical linear regressions and mediation analysis. Ethical approval was granted by University College Dublin's Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A hierarchical linear regression employed by the current study indicated that emotional dysregulation and attachment anxiety significantly predicted OCD symptoms (F (5, 1016) = 65.7, p < 0.001). The indirect effect of emotional dysregulation as a mediator of attachment style and OCD symptom-severity was significant (B = 0.4311; 95 % CI: 0.3339 to.5381).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The current study utilized a cross-sectional design and causation cannot be derived from the results. The use of self-report scales may allow for biased responses and a predominantly Irish sample limits the generalizability of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study has both clinical and empirical implications as it demonstrates the role of emotional dysregulation and attachment insecurity in OCD severity, potentially advising the direction of future OCD interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119909"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Existing research has demonstrated an association between obsessive compulsive (OCD) and emotional dysregulation. Additionally, evidence suggests a relationship between OCD and attachment style. The current study (1) investigated if a model made up of emotional dysregulation and related constructs of emotion regulation skills, attachment styles and interpersonal emotion regulation predicted obsessive compulsive symptom severity, and (2) investigated the mediating role of emotional dysregulation between attachment style and OCD in a community sample.

Methods: Two hundred and twenty-six participants reported obsessive compulsive symptoms were recruited online and anonymously completed 6 questionnaires. The model was tested through hierarchical linear regressions and mediation analysis. Ethical approval was granted by University College Dublin's Ethics Committee.

Results: A hierarchical linear regression employed by the current study indicated that emotional dysregulation and attachment anxiety significantly predicted OCD symptoms (F (5, 1016) = 65.7, p < 0.001). The indirect effect of emotional dysregulation as a mediator of attachment style and OCD symptom-severity was significant (B = 0.4311; 95 % CI: 0.3339 to.5381).

Limitations: The current study utilized a cross-sectional design and causation cannot be derived from the results. The use of self-report scales may allow for biased responses and a predominantly Irish sample limits the generalizability of the study.

Conclusion: The current study has both clinical and empirical implications as it demonstrates the role of emotional dysregulation and attachment insecurity in OCD severity, potentially advising the direction of future OCD interventions.

情绪失调和依恋类型作为强迫症症状严重程度指标的作用。
背景:现有的研究已经证明了强迫症(OCD)与情绪失调之间的联系。此外,有证据表明强迫症和依恋类型之间存在关系。本研究(1)探讨了情绪失调及其相关的情绪调节技能、依恋类型和人际情绪调节结构是否能预测强迫症的严重程度;(2)在社区样本中研究了情绪失调在依恋类型和强迫症之间的中介作用。方法:在线招募226名有强迫症状的参与者,匿名填写6份问卷。通过层次线性回归和中介分析对模型进行检验。由都柏林大学伦理委员会批准。结果:本研究采用的层次线性回归表明,情绪失调和依恋焦虑显著预测强迫症症状(F(5,1016) = 65.7,p )局限性:本研究采用横断面设计,不能从结果中得出因果关系。使用自我报告量表可能会导致有偏见的反应,主要是爱尔兰人的样本限制了研究的普遍性。结论:本研究具有临床和实证意义,因为它证明了情绪失调和依恋不安全感在强迫症严重程度中的作用,可能为未来强迫症干预的方向提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信