Inadvertent cervical cancer: a narrative review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
David Viveros-Carreño, Nuria Agustí, Juliana Rodríguez, Nathalia Mora-Soto, Javier Burbano, Adriana Mayor, René Pareja
{"title":"Inadvertent cervical cancer: a narrative review.","authors":"David Viveros-Carreño, Nuria Agustí, Juliana Rodríguez, Nathalia Mora-Soto, Javier Burbano, Adriana Mayor, René Pareja","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadvertent cervical cancer, defined as infiltrative cervical carcinoma diagnosed after a simple hysterectomy for presumed benign disease, remains clinically significant yet understudied. Despite the potential for eradication of cervical carcinoma through vaccination, screening, and early treatment, disparities in health care access continue to result in preventable cases, some of which are identified only postoperatively. This condition has long been recognized, yet its management remains undefined and is supported primarily by low- or very low-quality evidence. Diagnostic failures often stem from inadequate preoperative evaluation, missed follow-up of abnormal screening results, and insufficient re-excision with conization when indicated. Social determinants of health, including race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status, contribute significantly to these lapses. The identification of invasive disease only postoperatively may negatively impact prognosis, even in early stages. Treatment strategies for inadvertent cervical cancer include observation, radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, and completion surgery, such as lymph node assessment with or without parametrectomy. While retrospective studies suggest similar oncologic outcomes across some strategies (eg, additional surgery or radiotherapy), the absence of prospective trials limits definitive conclusions. Furthermore, morbidity and quality-of-life outcomes are frequently underreported. To support clinical decision-making, we propose a risk-based classification of this condition, categorizing patients as very low, low, medium, or high risk. Until stronger evidence emerges, treatment decisions should be individualized based on tumor features, surgical approach, and patient preferences. This review summarizes current evidence, highlights gaps in knowledge, and offers a pragmatic algorithm for managing this complex clinical entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 8","pages":"101986"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inadvertent cervical cancer, defined as infiltrative cervical carcinoma diagnosed after a simple hysterectomy for presumed benign disease, remains clinically significant yet understudied. Despite the potential for eradication of cervical carcinoma through vaccination, screening, and early treatment, disparities in health care access continue to result in preventable cases, some of which are identified only postoperatively. This condition has long been recognized, yet its management remains undefined and is supported primarily by low- or very low-quality evidence. Diagnostic failures often stem from inadequate preoperative evaluation, missed follow-up of abnormal screening results, and insufficient re-excision with conization when indicated. Social determinants of health, including race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status, contribute significantly to these lapses. The identification of invasive disease only postoperatively may negatively impact prognosis, even in early stages. Treatment strategies for inadvertent cervical cancer include observation, radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, and completion surgery, such as lymph node assessment with or without parametrectomy. While retrospective studies suggest similar oncologic outcomes across some strategies (eg, additional surgery or radiotherapy), the absence of prospective trials limits definitive conclusions. Furthermore, morbidity and quality-of-life outcomes are frequently underreported. To support clinical decision-making, we propose a risk-based classification of this condition, categorizing patients as very low, low, medium, or high risk. Until stronger evidence emerges, treatment decisions should be individualized based on tumor features, surgical approach, and patient preferences. This review summarizes current evidence, highlights gaps in knowledge, and offers a pragmatic algorithm for managing this complex clinical entity.

无意的子宫颈癌:一个叙述性的回顾。
疏忽性宫颈癌,定义为浸润性宫颈癌诊断后,单纯子宫切除术推定良性疾病,仍有临床意义,但研究不足。尽管有可能通过接种疫苗、筛查和早期治疗根除宫颈癌,但在获得保健服务方面的差距继续导致可预防的病例,其中一些病例仅在术后才被发现。这种情况早已被认识到,但其治疗方法仍然不明确,并且主要由低质量或非常低质量的证据支持。诊断失败通常源于术前评估不充分,错过了异常筛查结果的随访,以及在指征时没有足够的锥形再切除。健康的社会决定因素,包括种族和民族、社会经济地位和保险状况,在很大程度上促成了这些失误。仅在术后识别侵袭性疾病可能会对预后产生负面影响,即使在早期也是如此。无意宫颈癌的治疗策略包括观察、伴化疗或不伴化疗的放疗,以及完成手术,如伴或不伴参数切除的淋巴结评估。虽然回顾性研究表明一些策略(例如,额外的手术或放疗)的肿瘤预后相似,但缺乏前瞻性试验限制了明确的结论。此外,发病率和生活质量结果经常被低估。为了支持临床决策,我们建议对这种情况进行基于风险的分类,将患者分为极低、低、中、高风险。在更有力的证据出现之前,治疗决定应根据肿瘤特征、手术方式和患者偏好进行个体化。这篇综述总结了目前的证据,突出了知识上的差距,并提供了一个实用的算法来管理这一复杂的临床实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信