Parent and perinatal professional priorities and perspectives for the pre-birth periviable conversation: a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.
{"title":"Parent and perinatal professional priorities and perspectives for the pre-birth periviable conversation: a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.","authors":"J Peterson, E J Johnstone, A Mahaveer, D M Smith","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1552911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periviable birth (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) presents clinicians and parents with numerous ethical, psychological and practical difficulties. The study aimed to identify key features within pre-birth periviable conversations for both professionals and parents, including priorities and challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from the key stakeholder groups: neonatologists/paediatricians (<i>n</i> = 5), obstetricians (<i>n</i> = 5), midwives (<i>n</i> = 5) and parents (<i>n</i> = 7). Interviews explored their experience of periviable counselling including priorities, challenges and perceptions. Thematic analysis was used to develop across parents and professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified summarising the parent and professional perspectives within the pre-birth periviable conversations: chronology and narrative within pre-birth conversations, different perspectives on uncertainty and the role of transparency within periviable trauma. The trauma experienced by parents through periviable birth can be compounded through poor communication practices of perinatal professionals. These themes demonstrate that the information provided to parents should consistently outline all available care options relevant to their baby, including compassionately delivered, but honest and descriptive accounts of emotive options, such as comfort care. Information should be individualised to the specific circumstances and risk factors of that individual family and incorporate discussion of topics key to the 'good parent belief' to empower parents within their role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perinatal professionals need to be able to utilise transparent communication, individualisation of information and understand the necessary role that narrative plays within decision-making. Future research is required to better understand the educational methods best suited to train perinatal professionals to incorporate these, and other trauma-informed care principles, within their communication and interactions with future parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1552911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1552911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Periviable birth (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) presents clinicians and parents with numerous ethical, psychological and practical difficulties. The study aimed to identify key features within pre-birth periviable conversations for both professionals and parents, including priorities and challenges.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from the key stakeholder groups: neonatologists/paediatricians (n = 5), obstetricians (n = 5), midwives (n = 5) and parents (n = 7). Interviews explored their experience of periviable counselling including priorities, challenges and perceptions. Thematic analysis was used to develop across parents and professionals.
Results: Three themes were identified summarising the parent and professional perspectives within the pre-birth periviable conversations: chronology and narrative within pre-birth conversations, different perspectives on uncertainty and the role of transparency within periviable trauma. The trauma experienced by parents through periviable birth can be compounded through poor communication practices of perinatal professionals. These themes demonstrate that the information provided to parents should consistently outline all available care options relevant to their baby, including compassionately delivered, but honest and descriptive accounts of emotive options, such as comfort care. Information should be individualised to the specific circumstances and risk factors of that individual family and incorporate discussion of topics key to the 'good parent belief' to empower parents within their role.
Conclusion: Perinatal professionals need to be able to utilise transparent communication, individualisation of information and understand the necessary role that narrative plays within decision-making. Future research is required to better understand the educational methods best suited to train perinatal professionals to incorporate these, and other trauma-informed care principles, within their communication and interactions with future parents.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.